Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Menşe Ülke ve Marka Menşeinin Tüketici Boykotlarına Etkisi: Ürün Değerlendirmesinin Aracılık Etkisi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 12, 1 - 13, 28.07.2023

Öz

Tüketici boykotları günümüzde her işletmenin karşılaşabileceği bir durumdur. Pazarlama literatüründe önemli bir konu olan boykotlarla ilgili araştırmalar çoğunlukla tüketicilerin boykotlara katılım motivasyonlarının belirlenmesidir. Bu çalışmada tüketici boykotlarına katılımı etkileyen faktörler olarak ülke menşei, marka menşei ve ürün değerlendirme faktörleri incelenmiştir. Bu etki incelenmesinde ürün değerlendirme faktörü aracı değişken olarak ele alınmıştır. Araştırmada Türk tüketicilerinin geçmişte çeşitli sebeplerle boykot ettikleri ülkeler arasından Fransa, İtalya ve Danimarka seçilmiştir. Yapılan analizler ve araştırma modeli, bu 3 ülke için ayrı ayır test edilmiştir. Yapılan faktör analizi sonucunda ülke menşei 2 faktöre, tüketici boykotları ise 3 faktöre ayrılmıştır. Araştırmanın ana kütlesini herhangi bir tüketici boykotuna katılmış olan 18 yaş üstü tüketiciler oluşturmaktadır. Örnek kütle sayısı ise 1077 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Örneklemin seçiminde kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma katılımcıları İstanbul’da yaşamaktadır. Araştırma sonucunda ülke menşeinin boykot etme niyeti üzerindeki etkisi olduğu İtalya ve Fransa için doğrulanırken Danimarka için etkinin bulunduğu tespit edilememiştir. Marka menşeinin etkisi İtalyan ürünlerinde etkili olmaktadır. Ülke menşeinin ve marka menşeinin tüketici boykotlarına katılım üzerindeki etkisinde ürün değerlendirme faktörünün kısmi aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Al-Shebil, S., Rasheed A. and Al-Shammari H. (2011). Coping with boycotts: An analysis and framework. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(3), 383-397.
  • Bilkey, W. J. and Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 89-100.
  • Braunsberger, K. and Buckler, B. (2011). What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research, 64, 96-102.
  • Ertuğrul, A. N. & Eren, B. A. (2020). Satış promosyonlarının UFRS 15 müşteri sözleşmelerinden hasılat standardına göre muhasebeleştirilmesi: BİST perakende firmaları ve örneklerle açıklama. Erzurum Teknik Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, (12), 39-61.
  • Ertuğrul, A. N. (2022). Perception of meaningful work and job satisfaction of accounting faculty members. Amazonia Investiga, 11(50), 232-244.
  • Ettenson, R. and Klein J. G. (2005). The fallout from French nuclear testing in the South Pacific: A longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 199-224.
  • Farah, M. F. and Newman, A. J. (2010). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence using a socio-cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347-355.
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural models with unobservables variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 39–50.
  • Friedman, M. (1985). Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970-1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, Summer, 19(1), 96-117.
  • Garrett, D. (1987). The Effectiveness of Marketing Policy Boycotts: Environmental Opposition to Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 46–57.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall.
  • Herz, M. F. and Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). I use it but will tell you that I don’t: consumers’ country-of-origin cue usage denial. Journal of International Marketing, 25(2), 52-71.
  • Hoffman, S. and Müller, S. (2009). Consumer boycotts due to factory relocation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 239-247.
  • Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Johansson, J. K., Douglas, S. P. and Nonaka, I. (1985). Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: a new methodological perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(4), 388-396.
  • Klein, J. G, Smith N. C. and John, A. (2004). Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109.
  • Laroche, M., Papadopoulos, N., Heslop, L. A. and Mourali, M. (2005). The influence of country image structure on consumer evaluations of foreign products. International Marketing Review. 22(1), 96-115.
  • Magnusson, P., Westjohn, S.A. and Zdravkovic, S. (2011). What? I thought Samsung was Japanese’: accurate or not, perceived country of origin matters. International Marketing Review, 28(5), 454-472.
  • Mukherjee, A. and Hoyer, W. D. (2001). The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 462-472.
  • Nijssen, E. J. and Douglas, S. P. (2004). Examining the animosity model in a country with a high level of foreign trade. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 23-38.
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory (Second ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Özsaçmacı, B., Yener, D. ve Dursun, T. (2019). Hedonizm, hedonik tüketim ve tüketimde materyalist eğilimler üzerine bir araştırma. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), 71-88.
  • Sen, S., Gürhan-Canlı, Z. and Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts. The Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399-417.
  • Sharma, P. (2011). Country of origin effects in developed and emerging markets: Exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(2), 285-306.
  • Taşçıoğlu, M. ve Yener, D. (2017). Tüketicilerin Boykotlara Karşı Tutumlarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma Menşei Ülke ve Sürdürülebilirliğin Etkileri. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 5, 54-67.
  • Taşçıoğlu, M. ve Yener, D. (2019). Materialism Domains and Perceived Risk Effects on Consumer Boycott Effectiveness. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(17), 355-369.
  • Thakor, M. V. and Kohli, C. S. (1996). Brand origin: conceptualization and review. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(3), 27-42.
  • Verlegh, P. W. and Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521-546.
  • Yener, D., Dursun, T. ve Oskaybaş, K. (2016). Determinants that affect consumers’ boycott participation. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (33), 61-75.
  • Yener, D. and Taşçıoğlu, M. (2021). Does the Use of Foreign Languages in Different Types of Products Lead to Different Consumer Perception?. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33(4), 386-398.
  • Yüksel, U. and Mryteza, V. (2009). An evaluation of strategic responses to consumer boycotts. Journals of Business Research, 62(2), 248-259.
  • Zhuang, G., Wang, X., Zhou, L. and Zhou, N. (2008). Asymmetric effects of brand origin confusion: evidence from the emerging market of China. International Marketing Review, 25(4), 441-457.

The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 12, 1 - 13, 28.07.2023

Öz

Consumer boycotts are a situation that every business can face today. Research on consumer boycotts, which is an important issue in the marketing literature, mostly determines the motivation of consumers to participate in boycotts. In this study, country origin, brand origin and product evaluation factors were examined as factors affecting participation in consumer boycotts. In the analysis of this effect, the product evaluation factor was considered as a mediator variable. In the research, France, Italy and Denmark were chosen among the countries that Turkish consumers boycotted for various reasons in the past. The analyzes and research model were tested separately for these 3 countries. As a result of the factor analysis, country of origin was divided into 2 factors and consumer boycotts were divided into 3 factors. Consumers over the age of 18 who have participated in any consumer boycott constitute the main population of the research. The sample size number consists of 1077 people. Convenience sampling method was used in the selection of the sample. Research participants live in Istanbul. As a result of the research, it was confirmed for Italy and France that the country of origin had an effect on the intention to boycott, but it could not be found for Denmark. The effect of brand origin is effective in Italian products. It has been determined that the product evaluation factor has a partial mediating effect in the effect of country of origin and brand origin on participation in consumer boycotts.

Kaynakça

  • Al-Shebil, S., Rasheed A. and Al-Shammari H. (2011). Coping with boycotts: An analysis and framework. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(3), 383-397.
  • Bilkey, W. J. and Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 89-100.
  • Braunsberger, K. and Buckler, B. (2011). What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research, 64, 96-102.
  • Ertuğrul, A. N. & Eren, B. A. (2020). Satış promosyonlarının UFRS 15 müşteri sözleşmelerinden hasılat standardına göre muhasebeleştirilmesi: BİST perakende firmaları ve örneklerle açıklama. Erzurum Teknik Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, (12), 39-61.
  • Ertuğrul, A. N. (2022). Perception of meaningful work and job satisfaction of accounting faculty members. Amazonia Investiga, 11(50), 232-244.
  • Ettenson, R. and Klein J. G. (2005). The fallout from French nuclear testing in the South Pacific: A longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 199-224.
  • Farah, M. F. and Newman, A. J. (2010). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence using a socio-cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347-355.
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural models with unobservables variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 39–50.
  • Friedman, M. (1985). Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970-1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, Summer, 19(1), 96-117.
  • Garrett, D. (1987). The Effectiveness of Marketing Policy Boycotts: Environmental Opposition to Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 46–57.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall.
  • Herz, M. F. and Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). I use it but will tell you that I don’t: consumers’ country-of-origin cue usage denial. Journal of International Marketing, 25(2), 52-71.
  • Hoffman, S. and Müller, S. (2009). Consumer boycotts due to factory relocation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 239-247.
  • Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Johansson, J. K., Douglas, S. P. and Nonaka, I. (1985). Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: a new methodological perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(4), 388-396.
  • Klein, J. G, Smith N. C. and John, A. (2004). Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109.
  • Laroche, M., Papadopoulos, N., Heslop, L. A. and Mourali, M. (2005). The influence of country image structure on consumer evaluations of foreign products. International Marketing Review. 22(1), 96-115.
  • Magnusson, P., Westjohn, S.A. and Zdravkovic, S. (2011). What? I thought Samsung was Japanese’: accurate or not, perceived country of origin matters. International Marketing Review, 28(5), 454-472.
  • Mukherjee, A. and Hoyer, W. D. (2001). The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 462-472.
  • Nijssen, E. J. and Douglas, S. P. (2004). Examining the animosity model in a country with a high level of foreign trade. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 23-38.
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory (Second ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Özsaçmacı, B., Yener, D. ve Dursun, T. (2019). Hedonizm, hedonik tüketim ve tüketimde materyalist eğilimler üzerine bir araştırma. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), 71-88.
  • Sen, S., Gürhan-Canlı, Z. and Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts. The Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399-417.
  • Sharma, P. (2011). Country of origin effects in developed and emerging markets: Exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(2), 285-306.
  • Taşçıoğlu, M. ve Yener, D. (2017). Tüketicilerin Boykotlara Karşı Tutumlarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma Menşei Ülke ve Sürdürülebilirliğin Etkileri. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 5, 54-67.
  • Taşçıoğlu, M. ve Yener, D. (2019). Materialism Domains and Perceived Risk Effects on Consumer Boycott Effectiveness. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(17), 355-369.
  • Thakor, M. V. and Kohli, C. S. (1996). Brand origin: conceptualization and review. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(3), 27-42.
  • Verlegh, P. W. and Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521-546.
  • Yener, D., Dursun, T. ve Oskaybaş, K. (2016). Determinants that affect consumers’ boycott participation. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (33), 61-75.
  • Yener, D. and Taşçıoğlu, M. (2021). Does the Use of Foreign Languages in Different Types of Products Lead to Different Consumer Perception?. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33(4), 386-398.
  • Yüksel, U. and Mryteza, V. (2009). An evaluation of strategic responses to consumer boycotts. Journals of Business Research, 62(2), 248-259.
  • Zhuang, G., Wang, X., Zhou, L. and Zhou, N. (2008). Asymmetric effects of brand origin confusion: evidence from the emerging market of China. International Marketing Review, 25(4), 441-457.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Dursun Yener 0000-0002-4294-4056

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Temmuz 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Nisan 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 12

Kaynak Göster

APA Yener, D. (2023). The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation. Econharran, 7(12), 1-13.
AMA Yener D. The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation. Econharran. Temmuz 2023;7(12):1-13.
Chicago Yener, Dursun. “The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation”. Econharran 7, sy. 12 (Temmuz 2023): 1-13.
EndNote Yener D (01 Temmuz 2023) The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation. Econharran 7 12 1–13.
IEEE D. Yener, “The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation”, Econharran, c. 7, sy. 12, ss. 1–13, 2023.
ISNAD Yener, Dursun. “The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation”. Econharran 7/12 (Temmuz 2023), 1-13.
JAMA Yener D. The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation. Econharran. 2023;7:1–13.
MLA Yener, Dursun. “The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation”. Econharran, c. 7, sy. 12, 2023, ss. 1-13.
Vancouver Yener D. The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation. Econharran. 2023;7(12):1-13.