Paternalist Liderlik ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkide İçsel Motivasyonun Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 81 - 90, 07.03.2024

Kasım Kağan Özlok

https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.1413335

Öz

The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivation in the Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Öz

This study aims to investigate the effect of paternalistic leadership on organizational citizenship behavior through intrinsic motivation. Hypotheses were developed within the scope of leader-member exchange theory to determine these relationships. The research was conducted with 292 people working in both public and private sectors in Erzincan province by using the survey method. The data obtained in the research were analyzed with SPSS 21 program. It was found that all hypotheses put forward in the research were supported. Paternalistic leadership has a significant and positive relationship with intrinsic motivation. Paternalistic leadership variable was found to have a positive relationship with intrinsic motivation variable. Paternalistic leadership variable was found to have a positive relationship with organizational citizenship variable. Organizational citizenship behavior and intrinsic motivation variables were also found to have a significant and positive relationship. In addition, the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation was determined as a result of the analyzes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Paternalistic Leadership, Intrinsic Motivation, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Leader-Member Exchange Theory

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, S. W., & Khan, T. (2016). Does Motivation Lead to Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Theoretical Review. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: A Administration and Management, 16(7), 43-49.
• Al-Haj, A. (2017). Leadership styles and employee motivation in Qatar organizations (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
• Anwar, H. (2013). Impact of paternalistic leadership on employees’ outcome–A study on the banking sector of Pakistan. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 7(6), 109-115.
• Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 445-466). Boston, MA: Springer US.
• Aycan, Z. (2015). Paternalistic leadership. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1-2.
• Brief, A. P., & Aldag, R. J. (1977). The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management review, 2(3), 496-500.
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
• Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117.
• Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281-1303.
• Gözükara, İ., Çolakoğlu, N., & Hatipoğlu, Z. (2022, October). The mediating role of employee motivation in the effect of paternalistic leadership on organizational creativity. In IAI Academıc Conference Proceedıngs (p. 40).
• Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context (pp. 84-127). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249-270.