Sabit Protetik Restorasyonlarda Marjinal Adaptasyonun In Vitro Ölçüm Yöntemleri

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 288 - 293, 26.01.2024

Ferruh Semir Smail Emir Yüzbaşıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1351881

Öz

Hastalara uygulanan sabit restorasyonların temel amacı, hastanın oral dokularına zarar vermeden, eksik dokuların; fonksiyonunu, fonasyonunu ve estetiğini sağlamaktır. Sabit protezlerdeki temel başarı kriterlerinden biri marjinal uyumdur. Marjinal uyumun kabul edilebilir olması, restorasyonun klinik
başarısını direkt olarak artırmaktadır. Uyumun ideal olmadığı restorasyonlarda dental plak birikimi oluşmakta, bağlantıyı sağlayan siman çözülmekte ve mikro sızıntılar meydana gelmektedir. Bu durum sonucunda destek dişlerin periodontal dokuları hasar görmekte, klinik ataçman kaybı yaşanmakta ve
kemik kayıpları gerçekleşmektedir. Bu derleme çalışmasında, marjinal uyumu ölçme teknikleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bu teknikler içinde; fotoğraflama ile doğrudan görüş tekniği, kesit alma tekniği, replika yöntemi, profilometri, silikon ağırlığın ölcülmesi, spesifik yazılım ve üç boyutlu tarama ile kontrol
etme, mikro- CT ve 3 boyutlu dijital değerlendirme yöntemleri bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bu ölçüm yöntemlerini hakkında bilgi vermek, vakaya özgü uygulanabilen ölçüm yöntemleri arasındaki kombinasyonları, yöntemlerin güvenirliğini değerlendirmek, yöntemler arasındaki doğruluğu
etkileyebilecek potansiyel faktörleri belirlemektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marjinal Uyum, Ölçüm Yöntemleri, İn Vitro, Sabit Restorasyonlar

In Vitro Measurement Methods of Marginal Adaptation in Fixed Prosthetic Restorations

Öz

The main purpose of fixed restorations is to provide function, phonation and aesthetics of the missing tissues without damaging the patient’s oral tissues. One of the main success criteria for fixed prostheses is marginal fit. An acceptable marginal fit directly increases the clinical success of the restoration. In restorations where the fit is not ideal, dental plaque accumulation occurs, the cement that provides the connection dissolves and microleakages occur. As a result, periodontal tissues of the supporting teeth are damaged, clinical attachment is lost and bone loss occurs. In this review study, techniques for measuring marginal fit were evaluated. These techniques include; direct vision technique with photography, cross-sectioning technique, replica method, profilometry, measurement of silicone weight, checking with specific software and three-dimensional scanning, micro-CT and 3D digital evaluation methods. The aim of this study is to provide information about these measurement methods, to
evaluate the combinations between measurement methods that can be applied case-specifically, to evaluate the reliability of the methods, and to identify potential factors that may affect the accuracy between methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marginal fitting;, Measurement Methods;, In vitro;, Fixed Restorations

Kaynakça

• 1. Rosenstiel, S.F., Land, M.F. and Fujimoto, J. (2006) Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th Edition, Mosby, St Louis, 323-327.
• 2. Goldin EB, Boyd NW 3rd, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Thompson VP. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic-pressed-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93(2):143-147. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.023
• 3. Shillingburg H.T, Hobo S, Whitsett LD et al. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, III. Baskı, Carol Stream (IL), Quintessence, ABD, 2003, 85- 103, 142-154, 455.
• 4. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405-408.
• 5. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(5):389-404.
• 6. Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(5):419-428.
• 7. Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD. Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(5):492-498.
• 8. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107-111.
• 9. Metiner, C. , Türker, Ş. B. & Keleş, M. A. (2019). Sabit Protetik Restorasyonlarda Marjinal Adaptasyon . European Journal of Research in Dentistry , 3 (1) , 35-43.
• 10. Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Threedimensional Evaluation. Oper Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct and 9., 43(5):530-538.
• 11. Anusavice KJ. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater 2012: 28:102-1.
• 12. Büyükdere, A. K. & Sertgöz, A. (2016). Sabit Protetik Restorasyonlarin İn Vivo Çalişmalar İle Değerlendirilmesi . Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi , 25 (13),0-0.
• 13. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. An up to 5-Year Clinical Evaluation of Posterior In-Ceram CAD/CAM Core Crowns Int J Prosthodont 2002, 15:451-6.
• 14. Contrepois, M., Soenen, A., Bartala, M., & Laviole, O. (2013). Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 110(6), 447–454.e10.
• 15. Ushivata O, Moraes JV. Method for marginal measurement of restorations:accesory device for toolmakers microskope. J Prosthet Dent. 2000, 83:362-6.
• 16. Good M, Mitchell C, Pintado M, et al: Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from try-in to 1-week post-cementation. J Dent 2009; 37:65-75.
• 17. Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH: Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:575-584 ).
• 18. Han HS, Yang HS, Lim HP, et al: Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:191-197
• 19. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, et al: Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-122
• 20. Son K, Lee S, Kang SH, et al. A Comparison Study of Marginal and Internal Fit Assessment Methods for Fixed Dental Prostheses. J Clin Med. 2019: 8(6):785.
• 21. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, et al: Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental allceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:587-592.
• 22. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, Cachovan G, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. Dent Mater. 2013; 29(8):851-858.
• 23. Pahlevaninezhad, H.; Khorasaninejad, M.; Huang, Y.W.; Shi, Z.; Hariri, L.P.; Adams, D.C.; Ding, V.; Zhu, A.; Qiu, C.W.; Capasso, F. Nano-optic endoscope for highresolution optical coherence tomography in vivo. Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 540.
• 24. Monteiro, G.Q.; Montes, M.A.; Gomes, A.S.; Mota, C.C.; Campello, C.C.; Freitas, A.Z. Marginal analysis ofresin composite restorative systems using optical coherence tomography. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27, e213–e223.
• 25. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137 Suppl:7S-13S. doi:10.14219/ jada.archive.2006.0398
• 26. Schlenz, M.A., Vogler, J.A.H., Schmidt, A. et al. Chairside measurement of the marginal and internal fit of crowns: a new intraoral scan–based approach. Clin Oral Invest 24, 2459–2468 (2020).