ALLAGMATIC OF EMBODIMENT

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 182 Sayı: 182, 27 - 52, 01.03.2014

Ruhtan Yalçıner

Öz

Embodiment might be defined as a complex aporia. In its contingent contexture, it denotes both the corporeality and abstractness of the lived experience. Embodiment is, at the same time, a world-forming experience. It is thus the leitmotif of being and becoming. In brief, it does canvas not only the own-world but also the with-world. Drawing upon hermeneutic phenomenology and general organology, this paper interprets embodiment as an allagmatic system of transductive dispositions in-between immanence, attunement and narration. In this essay, embodiment is interpreted as a transductive system of operations, which is exposed through allagmatic of individuation. Throughout the study, allagmatic has been taken as a critical leitmotif of generating alternative appraisal of psychic and collective individuation. This essay suggests reading some of the key arguments of hermeneutic phenomenology of self, other and world in parallel paths to the possibility of a general organology of individuation. Gilbert Simondon’s ontology of interrelatedness and its critical version in Gilles Deleuze have been taken as central leitmotifs of enhancing allagmatic of embodiment. By reference to critique of hylomorphic exactitude, allagmatic of embodiment presents a reading of being as becoming. As regard to phenomenological and hermeneutical interpretation of embodiment, in line with Simondonian and Deleuzean organology, the major emphasis is posited on Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s practical philosophy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Embodiment, body, hermeneutics, phenomenology, allagmatics

TECESSÜMÜN ALAGMATİĞİ

Öz

Tecessüm karmaşık bir aporia olarak tanımlanabilir. Bağlamsal niteliği açısından, hayat tecrübesinin cismiyetini olduğu kadar, soyutluğunu da ifade eder. Tecessüm, aynı zamanda, dünya-kuran bir tecrübedir. Tecessüm, varlığın ve var’oluşun tekerrür vasfıdır. Ezcümle; tecessüm, yalnızca özgün-dünya’yı değil, aynı zamanda, birliktelik-dünyası’nı da resmeder. Hermeneutik fenomenoloji ve genel organolojiden hareketle bu çalışma tecessümü; içkinlik, aidiyet ve anlatısallık arası(nda) alagmatik bir aktarımlar sistemi olarak yorumlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada; tecessüm, bireyleşme alagmatiği üzerinden açığa serilen, aktarımsal bir operasyonlar sistemi olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma boyunca alagmatik, psişik ve kolektif bireyleşmenin alternatif bir okumasını oluşturmak için başvurulan eleştirel bir dayanak olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu makale; kendi, öteki ve dünya’nın hermeneutik fenomenolojisinin kimi öne çıkan argümanlarını, bireyleşmenin genel organolojisi imkânıyla paralel olarak okumayı önermektedir. Gilbert Simondon’un karşılıklı-bağlantısallık ontolojisi ile bunun Gilles Deleuze’deki eleştirel versiyonu, tecessümün allagmatiğini geliştirirken başvurulan merkezi temalardır. Hilomorfik kesinliğin eleştirisine referansla, tecessümün alagmatiği, oluş olarak varlık okuması sunmaktadır. Simondoncu ve Deleuzcü organolojiyle paralel olarak, tecessümün fenomenolojik ve hermeneutik yorumları açısından öncelik; Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger ve Hans-Georg Gadamer’in pratik felsefelerine atfedilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tecessüm, Simondon, hermeneutik fenomenoloji, genel organoloji, alagmatik, bireyleşme, kimlik, metastabilite, inter-kinestetik empati.

Kaynakça

• BARBARAS, R. (2004). The Being of the Phenomenon: Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• BARTHES, R. (1975). “An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative”, New Literary History, 6(2), 237-279.
• BOURDIEU, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• CHABOT, P. (2012). The Philosophy of Simondon: Between Technology and Individuation, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
• COMBES, M. (2012). Gilbert Simondon and the Philosophy of the Transindividual, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• CUTROFELLO, A. (2005). Continental Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction, New York: Routledge.
• DAMASIO, A. R. (2000). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness, Boston: Mariner Books.
• DE BOER, K. (2000). Thinking in the Light of Time: Heidegger’s Encounter with Hegel, Albany: State University of New York Press.
• DELANDA, M. (1999). “Immanence and Transcendence in the Genesis of Form”. In I. BUCHANAN (Ed.), A Deleuzian Century? Durham: Duke University Press, 119-134.
• DELEUZE, G. (1990). The Logic of Sense, New York: Columbia University Press.
• DELEUZE, G. (2001a). Difference and Repetition, London: Continuum.
• DELEUZE, G. (2001b). “Review of Gilbert Simondon’s L’individu et sa genèse physic-biologique (1966)”, Pli, 12, 43-49.
• DELEUZE, G. & GUATTARI, F. (2005). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• DILTHEY, W. (2002). The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences. Selected Works, Vol. III, R. A. MAKKREEL, & F. RODI (Eds.), Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• FREUD, S. (1955). “The Uncanny”. In J. STRACHEY (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XVII, London: Hogarth Press, 218-252.
• FUCHS, T. & SCHLIMME, J. (2009). “Embodiment and Psychopathology: A Phenomenological Perspective”, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 570-575.
• GADAMER, H-G. (2004a). Truth and Method, New York: Continuum.
• GADAMER, H-G. (2004b). Philosophical Hermeneutics, Berkeley: University of California Press.
• GASCHÉ, R. (1986) The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• HEIDEGGER, M. (1994). Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• HEIDEGGER, M. (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• HEIDEGGER, M. (1996). Being and Time, Albany: State University of New York Press.
• HEIDEGGER, M. (1999). Ontology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• HEIDEGGER, M. (2010). Phenomenology of Intiution and Expression: Theory of Philosophical Concept Formation, London: Continuum.
• HODGE, J. (1995) Heidegger and Ethics. London: Routledge.
• HOMER, S. (2005). Jacques Lacan, London: Routledge.
• HUSSERL, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• HUSSERL, E. (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• HUSSERL, E. (2000). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book:
Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution, Dordrecht: Cluver.
• HUSSERL, E. (2001). Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic, Dordrecht: Cluver.
• HUSSERL, E. (2006). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, From the Lectures, Winter Semester, 1910-1911, Dodrecht: Springer.
• IRIGARAY, L. (1995). “The Question of the Other”, Yale French Studies, 87, 7-19.
• JUNG, H. Y. (1996). “Phenomenology and Body Politics”, Body & Society, 2(1), 1-22.
• KOCKELMANS, J. J. (1994). Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology, West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
• LACAN, J. (2001a). “Aggressivity in Psychoanalysis”. In J. LACAN, Ecrits: A Selection, London: Routledge, 82-101.
• LACAN, J. (2001b). “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I”. In J. LACAN, Ecrits: A Selection, London: Routledge, 75-81.
• LACAN, J. (2001c). “The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis”. In J. LACAN, Ecrits: A Selection, London: Routledge, 197-268.
• LEVINAS, E. (1998). Entre-nous: On thinking-of-the-Other, New York: Columbia University Press.
• LEVINAS, E. (2007). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
• MALABOU, C. (2009). The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic, London: Routledge.
• MALABOU, C. (2010). Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: Dialectic, Destruction, Deconstruction, New York: Columbia University Press.
• MANNING, E. (2013). Always More Than One: Individuation’s Dance, Durham: Duke University Press.
• MASSUMI, B. (2009). Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurent Arts, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.
• RICOEUR, P. (1991). “Life in Quest of Narrative”. In D. WOOD (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur, London: Routledge, 20-33.
• SIMONDON, G. (1992). “The Genesis of the Individual”. In J. CRARY & S. KWINTER (Eds.), Incorporations: Zone 6, New York: Zone, 269-319.
• SIMONDON, G. (1995). L'individu et sa Genèse Physico-biologique, Grenoble: Éditions Jérôme Millon.

• SIMONDON, G. (2007). L’individuation Psychique et Collective: A la lumière des notions de Forme Information Potentiel et Métastabilité, Paris: Editions Aubier.
• SPARROW, T. (2013). Levinas Unhinged, Winchester: Zero Books.
• THIELE, L. P. (1995). Timely Meditations: Martin Heidegger and Postmodern Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• TOSCANO, A. (2006). The Theatre of Production: Philosophy and Individuation between Kant and Deleuze. New York: Palgrave.
• TOSCANO, A. (2009). “Gilbert Simondon”. In G. JONES and J. ROFFE (Eds.), Deleuze's Philosophical Lineage, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 380–398.
• ZANER, R. M. (1964). The Problem of Embodiment: Some Contributions to a Phenomenology of the Body, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• ZANER, R. M. (1981). The Context of Self: A Phenomenological Inquiry Using Medicine as a Clue. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
• ZIMMERMAN, M. E. (1986). Eclipse of the Self: The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of Authenticity, Athens OH: Ohio University Press.
• ŽIŽEK, S. (2000). “Melancholy and the Act”, Critical Inquiry, 26(4), 657- 681.
• ZUBIRI, X. (2010). The Fundamental Problems of Western Metaphysics, Lanham: University Press of America.