Effectiveness Of Different Methods For Screening Of Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) Drought Tolerant Cultıvars

Mehdi Ghaffarı

Effectiveness Of Different Methods For Screening Of Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) Drought Tolerant Cultıvars

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: Özel Sayı-2, 1584 - 1589, 01.03.2014

Öz

Effectiveness of index versus multivariate based methods for screening of sunflower genotypes were compared under drought stress in vegetative, flowering and grain filling stages. Field evaluation was carried out as a strip plot design with three replications at Khoy Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Station in Iran. Flowering stage identified as the most sensitive stage to water deficit with 38% reduction in grain yield compared with normal irrigation. Hybrid Farrokh had the highest seed yield in all irrigation treatments (3686, 2856, 2256 and 2506 Kg/ha in control and water deficit in vegetative, flowering and grain filling stages respectively). The lowest and highest reduction in seed yield was observed in Lakomka and Hysun33 respectively in all drought treatments. According to the stress tolerance and sensitivity indices Farrokh and Hysun33 were the most drought tolerant and sensitive cultivars under all drought treatments respectively. After drought stress in vegetative stage cluster analysis based on all agronomic measurements differentiated Farrokh from others, however there was no singly differentiated cultivar in flowering and seed filling stages. Principle component analysis identified Farrokh as the most drought tolerant while Record as the sensitive cultivars under all drought regimes. Relative water content, head diameter and SPAD value were the main determinant of seed yield under drought stress in vegetative, flowering and seed filling stages respectively. All the methods confirmed Farrokh as the most drought tolerant cultivar, however there were no unique results for identifying of drought sensitive cultivar. Regarding seed yield as the final target it is concluded that principle component analysis merging all plant characteristics can be used as an effective differentiator of genotypes under different water regimes

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cluster analysis, Drought stress, Phenological stages, Principle component analysis

Kaynakça

Anjum, S.A., Xie, X.Y., Wang, L.C., Saleem, M.F., Man, C., Lei, W., 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African J. Agri. Res. 6(9), 2026-2032.
Chimenti, C.A., Pearson, J., Hall, A.J., 2002. Osmotic adjustment and yield maintenance under drought in sunflower. Field Crop Res 75(2): 235-246.
Clarke, J.M., Depauw, R.M., Townleysmith, T.F., 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 32:723-728.
Darvishzadeh, R., Pirzad, A., Hatami-Maleki, H., Poormohammad Kiani, S., Sarrafi, A., 2010. Evaluation of the reaction of sunflower inbred lines and their F1 hybrids to drought conditions using various stress tolerance indices. Span J Agric Res 8:1037-1046.
De la Vega, A., Chapman, S.C., Hall, A.J., 2001. Genotype by environment interaction and indirect selection for yield in sunflower. I. Two-mode pattern analysis of oil yield and biomass yield across environments in Argentina. Field Crop Res 27: 17-38.
Erdem, T., Erdem, Y., Orta, A.H., Okursoy, H., 2006. Use of a crop water stress index for scheduling the irrigation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Turk J Agric For 30:11-20.
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the Int. Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, 13-18 August, p.257-270. Tainan, Taiwan.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 29:897-912.
Ghaffari, M., 2006. Sunflower production guide. and Agricultural Research Center of West Azerbaijan, Iran. pp.4. (In Persian). Resources
Ghaffari, M., Farrokhi, K. 2008. Principal component analysis as a reflector of combining abilities. Proc. 17th Int. Sunflower Conf. Cordoba, Spain, pp 499-504.
Ghaffari, M., Toorchi, M., Valizadeh, M., Shakiba, M.R., screening of sunflower inbred lines under drought stress condition. Turk J Field Crops 17: 185-190.
Kroonenberg, P.M. 1997. Introduction to biplots for G x E tables. Research report No. 51. Center for Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. University of
Murphy, D.J., 2010. Improvement of industrial oil crops. In: Singh, B (ed), Industrial crops and uses. CABI International, Cambridge, pp. 183-206.
Razi, H., Assad, M.T., 1999. Comparison of selection criteria in normal and limited irrigation in sunflower. Euphytica 105:83-90.
Rauf, S., 2008. Breeding sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for drought tolerance. CBCS 3(1):29-44.
Rauf S. and Sadaqat H.A. 2008. Identification of physiological combined to high achene yield in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under contrasting water regimes. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 1(1): 23-30. genotypes
Rodriguez, D.J., Romero-Garcia, J., Rodriguez- Garcia, R., Angulo-Sanchez, J.L., 2002. Characterization sunflower leaves and seeds: Relationship of biomass and seed yield. In: Janick J., Whipkey, A. (eds), Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, pp. 143-149. from
Schneiter, A.A., Miller, J.F., 1981. Description of sunflower growth stages. Crop Sci 21: 901- 903.
Sinclair T.R. and Ludlow M.M. 1985. Who taught plants thermodynamics? the unfulfilled potential of plant water potential. Funct. Plant Biol., 12: 213-217.
Singh, B.D., 2000. Plant Breeding, Principles and Methods. New Delhi, India: Kalyani Publishers, 896 p.
Tahir, M.H.N., Muhammad, I., Hussain, M.K., 2002. Evaluation annuus L.) inbred lines for drought tolerance. Int J Agric Biol 3: 398–400.
Tersac M., Vares, D., Vincourt, P., 1993. Combining groups in cultivated sunflower populations and their relationships with country of origin. Theor Appl Genet 87: 603-608.