BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Promoting Gender Equality in Educational Settings: The Role of Computer Supported Cooperative Learning

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 9 - 20, 20.02.2015

Öz

New media makes possible new forms of collaboration and interaction in educational settings. Group-based instructional methods, as collaborative and cooperative learning can be mediated by specific computer-based applications and methods.

In this article arguments are presented for differentiating collaborative and cooperative learning methods on offline and computer-mediated environments as well. In comparison to CSCL (Computer Supported Collaborative Learning), there is a well-established need for further research into the areas of Computer Supported Cooperative learning (CSCpL), with special attention paid for its impact on peer relationships in general, and social inclusion or reducing gender differences in particular.

Kaynakça

  • AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
  • Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning - an empirical-evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174. doi: 10.2307/249763
  • Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2012). Small-group, computer-mediated argumentation in middle-school classrooms: The effects of gender and different types of online teacher guidance. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 375-397. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02030.x
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., National Research Council, C. o. B., Social, S., & Education, C. o. D. i. t. S. o. L. W. D. C. U. S. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC, US: National Academy Press.
  • Cabrera, A. F., Crissman, J. L., Bernal, E. M., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., & Pascarella, E. T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity. Journal Of College Student Development, 43(1), 20-34.
  • Chen, C. H., Chung, M. Y., & Wu, W. C. V. (2013). The Effects of Faded Prompts and Feedback on College Students' Reflective Writing Skills. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 571-583. doi: 10.1007/s40299-013-0059-z
  • De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van de Ven, A. (2001). Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: A design experiment. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 71, 531-559.
  • de Groot, E., Endedijk, M. D., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Simons, P. R. J., & van Beukelen, P. (2014). Critically reflective dialogues in learning communities of professionals. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(1), 15-37. doi: 10.1080/0158037x.2013.779240
  • Ding, N., Bosker, R. J., & Harskamp, E. G. (2011). Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 56(2), 325-336. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.004
  • EC. (2008). The use of ICT to support innovation and lifelong learning for all - A report on progress. Brussels: EC.
  • EC. (2011). Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe 2011: Eurydice.
  • Fauville, G., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Saljo, R. (2014). ICT tools in environmental education: reviewing two newcomers to schools. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 248-283. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.775220
  • Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers In Human Behavior, 22(2), 163-176. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001
  • Garcia-Valcarcel, A., Basilotta, V., & Lopez, C. (2014). ICT in Collaborative Learning in the Classrooms of Primary and Secondary Education. Comunicar(42), 65-74. doi: 10.3916/c42-2014-06
  • George, D. R., & Dellasega, C. (2011). Use of social media in graduate-level medical humanities education: Two pilot studies from Penn State College of Medicine. Medical Teacher, 33(8), E429-E434. doi: 10.3109/0142159x.2011.586749
  • Gress, C. L. Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers In Human Behavior, 26(5), 806-814. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.012
  • Guiller, J., Dumdell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001
  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research And Development, 55(3), 223-252. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1111-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.002
  • Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Holubec, E. J. (1998). Cooperation in the Classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
  • Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS). Computers & Education, 59(4), 1162-1169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021
  • Kramer, B. S., Walker, A., & Brill, J. M. (2007). The Underutilization of Internet and Communication Technology-assisted Collaborative Project-Based Learning Among International Educators: A Delphi Study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(5), 527-543.
  • Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. . The J.H.G.I. Giesbers Reports on Education. Department of Educational Sciences. University on Nijmegen.
  • Nam, C. W., & Zellner, R. D. (2011). The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 680-688. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.010
  • Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484-495. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q
  • Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2008). Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice. Annual Review Of Psychology, 60(1), 339-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607
  • Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178. doi: 10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00045-8
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
  • Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2007). Gender-related differences in computer-mediated communication and computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 393-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00224.x
  • Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The Impact of Wb2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
  • Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230-253.
  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3 McGilly, Kate (Ed). (1994). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. (pp. 201 228). . xvi, 317 pp.SEE BOOK.
  • Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
  • Sharan, S. (1980). COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN SMALL-GROUPS - RECENT METHODS AND EFFECTS ON ACHIEVEMENT, ATTITUDES, AND ETHNIC-RELATIONS. Review Of Educational Research, 50(2), 241-271. doi: 10.3102/00346543050002241
  • Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
  • Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003
  • Spalding, E., & Wilson, A. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1393-1421. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00208
  • Taradi, S. K., Taradi, M., Radic, K., & Pokrajac, N. (2005). Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(1), 35-39. doi: 10.1152/advan.00026.2004
  • Tomai, M., Mebane, M. E., Rosa, V., & Benedetti, M. (2014). Can Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Promote Counter-stereotypical Gender Communication Styles in Male and Female University Students? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(0), 4384-4392. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.952
  • Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2012). Using reflection triggers while learning in an online course. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1030-1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01257.x
  • Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review Of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634. doi: 10.3102/00346543071004613
  • Vurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a Foreign Language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 126-143. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.639784
  • Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
  • Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.001
  • Zsigmond, I. (2013). Blogging for Learning: A Case Study at Sapientia University. Paper presented at the EDULEARN13, Barcelona.

Promoting Gender Equality in Educational Settings: The Role of Computer Supported Cooperative Learning

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 9 - 20, 20.02.2015

Öz

New media makes possible new forms of collaboration and interaction in educational settings. Group-based instructional methods, as collaborative and cooperative learning can be mediated by specific computer-based applications and methods.

In this article arguments are presented for differentiating collaborative and cooperative learning methods on offline and computer-mediated environments as well. In comparison to CSCL (Computer Supported Collaborative Learning), there is a well-established need for further research into the areas of Computer Supported Cooperative learning (CSCpL), with special attention paid for its impact on peer relationships in general, and social inclusion or reducing gender differences in particular.

Kaynakça

  • AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
  • Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning - an empirical-evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174. doi: 10.2307/249763
  • Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2012). Small-group, computer-mediated argumentation in middle-school classrooms: The effects of gender and different types of online teacher guidance. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 375-397. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02030.x
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., National Research Council, C. o. B., Social, S., & Education, C. o. D. i. t. S. o. L. W. D. C. U. S. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC, US: National Academy Press.
  • Cabrera, A. F., Crissman, J. L., Bernal, E. M., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., & Pascarella, E. T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity. Journal Of College Student Development, 43(1), 20-34.
  • Chen, C. H., Chung, M. Y., & Wu, W. C. V. (2013). The Effects of Faded Prompts and Feedback on College Students' Reflective Writing Skills. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 571-583. doi: 10.1007/s40299-013-0059-z
  • De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van de Ven, A. (2001). Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: A design experiment. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 71, 531-559.
  • de Groot, E., Endedijk, M. D., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Simons, P. R. J., & van Beukelen, P. (2014). Critically reflective dialogues in learning communities of professionals. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(1), 15-37. doi: 10.1080/0158037x.2013.779240
  • Ding, N., Bosker, R. J., & Harskamp, E. G. (2011). Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 56(2), 325-336. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.004
  • EC. (2008). The use of ICT to support innovation and lifelong learning for all - A report on progress. Brussels: EC.
  • EC. (2011). Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe 2011: Eurydice.
  • Fauville, G., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Saljo, R. (2014). ICT tools in environmental education: reviewing two newcomers to schools. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 248-283. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.775220
  • Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers In Human Behavior, 22(2), 163-176. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001
  • Garcia-Valcarcel, A., Basilotta, V., & Lopez, C. (2014). ICT in Collaborative Learning in the Classrooms of Primary and Secondary Education. Comunicar(42), 65-74. doi: 10.3916/c42-2014-06
  • George, D. R., & Dellasega, C. (2011). Use of social media in graduate-level medical humanities education: Two pilot studies from Penn State College of Medicine. Medical Teacher, 33(8), E429-E434. doi: 10.3109/0142159x.2011.586749
  • Gress, C. L. Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers In Human Behavior, 26(5), 806-814. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.012
  • Guiller, J., Dumdell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001
  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research And Development, 55(3), 223-252. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1111-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.002
  • Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Holubec, E. J. (1998). Cooperation in the Classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
  • Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS). Computers & Education, 59(4), 1162-1169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021
  • Kramer, B. S., Walker, A., & Brill, J. M. (2007). The Underutilization of Internet and Communication Technology-assisted Collaborative Project-Based Learning Among International Educators: A Delphi Study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(5), 527-543.
  • Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. . The J.H.G.I. Giesbers Reports on Education. Department of Educational Sciences. University on Nijmegen.
  • Nam, C. W., & Zellner, R. D. (2011). The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 680-688. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.010
  • Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484-495. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q
  • Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2008). Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice. Annual Review Of Psychology, 60(1), 339-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607
  • Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178. doi: 10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00045-8
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
  • Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2007). Gender-related differences in computer-mediated communication and computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 393-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00224.x
  • Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The Impact of Wb2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
  • Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230-253.
  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3 McGilly, Kate (Ed). (1994). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. (pp. 201 228). . xvi, 317 pp.SEE BOOK.
  • Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
  • Sharan, S. (1980). COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN SMALL-GROUPS - RECENT METHODS AND EFFECTS ON ACHIEVEMENT, ATTITUDES, AND ETHNIC-RELATIONS. Review Of Educational Research, 50(2), 241-271. doi: 10.3102/00346543050002241
  • Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
  • Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003
  • Spalding, E., & Wilson, A. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1393-1421. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00208
  • Taradi, S. K., Taradi, M., Radic, K., & Pokrajac, N. (2005). Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(1), 35-39. doi: 10.1152/advan.00026.2004
  • Tomai, M., Mebane, M. E., Rosa, V., & Benedetti, M. (2014). Can Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Promote Counter-stereotypical Gender Communication Styles in Male and Female University Students? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(0), 4384-4392. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.952
  • Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2012). Using reflection triggers while learning in an online course. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1030-1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01257.x
  • Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review Of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634. doi: 10.3102/00346543071004613
  • Vurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a Foreign Language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 126-143. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.639784
  • Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
  • Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.001
  • Zsigmond, I. (2013). Blogging for Learning: A Case Study at Sapientia University. Paper presented at the EDULEARN13, Barcelona.
Toplam 47 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Istvan Zsıgmond Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Şubat 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Zsıgmond, I. (2015). Promoting Gender Equality in Educational Settings: The Role of Computer Supported Cooperative Learning. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.12780/uusbd.50473

Adres: Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Telefon: 0276 221 21 60 Faks :0276 221 21 61
E-posta: sosyaldergi@usak.edu.tr