Karpuzda Aşılamanın Besin Element İçeriği ve Verim Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 55 Sayı: 1, 67 - 74, 30.03.2018

Şafak Ceylan Özlem Alan Ömer Lütfü Elmacı

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.390891

Cited By: 8

Öz

Bu çalışma,  aşılı fide kullanımının ve farklı anaç-kalem
kombinasyonlarının, karpuz bitkisinin yaprak -meyve besin element içeriklerine
ve verimine etkilerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Crisby ve Crimstar
çeşitlerinin, Ferro ve RS 841 (Cucurbita
maxima x Cucurbita moschata) ticari hibrit anaçlarına aşılı fideleri ile
aşısız (kontrol) fideleri kullanılmıştır. Aşılı bitkilerin, yapraklarında K,
Mg, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn içerikleri; meyvede N içerikleri kontrole (aşısız
olanlara) göre önemli düzeyde artmıştır. Anaçların, yaprak Fe, Cu, Zn; meyve N,
P, Ca, Cu,  Zn içeriklerine önemli etkisi
gözlenmiştir. Yaprakların K ve Fe içerikleri ile meyvelerin Fe, Cu, Zn ve kuru
madde içerikleri, çeşitler arasında önemli farklılıklar göstermiştir. Aşılama
ve anaç-kalem kombinasyonlarının verim üzerine önemli etkisi olmuştur. Ferro
anacına aşılı Crimstar çeşidi ile en yüksek verim elde edilmiştir. Aşılı
bitkilerde meyvenin kuru madde içeriği ile yaprakların Ca ve Mg içerikleri
arasında önemli pozitif korelasyon belirlenmiştir.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Citrullus lanatus, Anaç, Kalem, Besin Elementi, Verim

Effects of Grafting on Nutrient Element Content and Yield in Watermelon

Öz

This study was conducted to determine the effects of grafting and rootstock-scion
combinations on the yield and nutrient content for both the leaves and fruit of
watermelons. Two watermelon (Citrillus
lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum and Nakai) varieties Crisby and Crimstar were
grafted on to Ferro and RS 841, and the commercial hybrids of Cucurbita maxima x Cucurbita moschata.
Non-grafted plants were used as controls. In the grafted plants the content of K, Mg, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn in the leaves and N in fruits
significantly increased when compared to the control. A significant effect was
observed in the rootstocks for the Fe, Cu, Zn content in the leaves and the N,
P, Ca, Cu and Zn content in the fruit. The K and Fe content in the leaf and the
Fe, Cu, Zn and dry matter content in the fruit were also found to be
significant between the varieties. Grafting and rootstock-scion combinations
affect fruit yield. The Crimstar/Ferro combination had the highest yield. Also,
in the grafted plants, the dry matter content of
the fruits had a significant positive correlation with the Ca and Mg content of
the leaves.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Citrullus lanatus, Rootstock, Scion, Nutrient element, Yield

Kaynakça

• Abdelmageed, A.H. A and N. Gruda. 2009. Influence of grafting on growth, development and some physiological parameters of tomatoes under controlled heat stress conditions. European Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 74(1):16-20.
• Andrade Junior A. S. de, Dias N da S, L.G. M. Figueiredo Junior, V. Q. Ribeiro, D. B. Sampaio. 2006. Response of watermelon to nitrogen application via fertigation. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, 10:836–841.
• Anonymous, 1951. U.S. Soil Survey Staff, Soil Survey Manual, U.S. Dept. Agr. Handbook 18, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC, USA.
• Atalay, I.Z, Kılınç, R., Anaç, D. and İ. Yokaş. 1986. Gediz Havzası Rendzina topraklarının potasyum durumu ve bu topraklarda alınabilir potasyum miktarlarının tayininde kullanılacak yöntemler, Bilgehan Matbaası, İzmir, s.25.
• Baker, W. H. and T.L. Thompson. 1992. “Determination of total nitrogen in plant samples by Kjeldahl“ in C. Oven Plank (Ed.). Plant Analysis Reference Procedures for the Southern Region of the United State, Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 368. May.
• Barneix, A. J. and H. F. Causın. 1996. The central role of amino acids on nitrogen utilization and plant growth. Journal of Plant Physiology, 149: 358-362.
• Bekhradi, F., A. Kashi and M. Delshad. 2011. Effect of three cucurbit rootstocks on vegetative and yield of ‘Charleston Grey’ watermelon. International Journal of Plant Production, 5(2):105-109.
• Bingham, F.T. 1949. Soil Test for Phosphate. California Agriculture, 3(7):11-14.
• Bletsos, F. and H.C. Passam. 2010. Grafting:an environmentally friendly technique to overcome soil-borne diseases and improve the out of season production of watermelon, cucumber and melon. In: Sampson A N (Eds), Horticulture in the 21th Century, Nova Science, New York pp:81-120.
• Bremner, J. M. 1965. “Total nitrogen”, in Black, C.A. (Editor) Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2, American Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin-USA. pp: 1149-1178.
• Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. ‘Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil’,Agronomy J., Vol. 54(5):464-465.
• Davis, A., P.V. Penelope, Y. Sakata, L.G. Salvador, J. V. Maroto, S.G. Lee, Y. C. Huh, Z. Sun, A. Miguel, S. King, R. Cohen, J.M. Lee. 2008. ‘Cucurbit Grafting’, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 27(1):50-74.
• Edelstein, M., M. Ben–Hur and Z. Plout. 2007. Grafted melons irrigated with fresh or effluent water tolerate excess boron. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 132:484-491.
• Erdal, İ., K. Kepenek and İ. Kızılgöz. 2005. Effect of elemental sulphur and sulphur containing waste on the iron nutrition of strawberry plants grown in a calcareous soil. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 23(3):263-272.
• FAO, (2014). Statistical Database. www.fao.org.com. (Access date: February, 2017).
• Gisbert, C., J. Prohens and F. Nuez. 2011. Performance of eggplant grafted onto cultivated, wild and hybrid materials of eggplant and tomato. International Journal of Plant Production, 5 (4):367-380.
• Hanlon, E. A. 1992. Determination of total Manganese, Iron, Copper and Zinc in Plants by Atomic Absorption Techniques in C. Oven Plank (Ed.) Plant Analysis Reference Procedures for the Southern Region of the United States, Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 368. May.
• Hartmann, H. and D. Schwatz. 2009. Interactive effects of grafting and manganese supply on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by tomato. Horticultural Science, 44 (7):1978-1982.
• Hu, C.M., Y. L. Zhu, N. F. Chen and Y. M. Huang. 2006. Comparasion of photosynthetic characteristics of grafted and own-root seedling of cucumber under low temperature circumstances. Acta Bot.Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 26:247-253.
• IFA, 1992. IFA World fertilizer use manuel. Int. Fert. Industry Assoc., Paris.
• Ikeda, H., O. Shinji and A. Kazuo. 1986. The comparision between soil and hydroponics in magnesium absorption of grafting cucumber and the effect of increased application of magnesium. Bull. Natl. Veg. Res. Ins. Japan C9: 31-41.
• Jackson, M.L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
• Kacar, B. 1984. Plant Nutrition Application Guide. Ankara Uni. Agr. Fac. Pub., 900, Application Guide: 214.
• Kacar, B. 1995. Toprak Analizleri: Bitki ve toprağın kimyasal analizleri III, Ankara Üni., Zir. Fak., Eğitim Araş. ve Geliştirme Vakfı Yayınları, pp.81–86.
• Kato, T. and H. Lou. 1989. Effect of rootstock on the yield, mineral nutrition and hormone level in xysilem sap in eggplant. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 58:345-352.
• Kappel, N., G. Balazes , D. Fekete and V. Bohm. 2013. Use of Different Potassium and Magnesium Treatments in Watermelon Production by Fertigation. International Potash Institute, Research Findings, e-ifc No. 36.
• Khah, E. M. 2011. Effect of grafting on growth, performance and yield of aubergine (Solanum melongena L.) in greenhouse and open-field. International Journal of Plant Production 5 (4):359-366.
• Lee, J. M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current Status, grafting methods and benefits. Horticultural Science, 29: 235-239.
• Lee, J.M., C. Kubota, S.J. Tsao, Z. Bie, P. Hoyos Echevarria, L. Morra, and M. Oda. 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulturae, 127: 93-105.
• Leonardi, C. and F. Giuffrida. 2006. Variation of plant growth and macronutrient uptake in grafted tomatoes and eggplants on three different rootstocks. European Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 71: 97–101.
• Lindsay, W. L. and W. A. Norvell. 1978. Development of DTPA soil test for Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu. Soil Sci. Soc. American J., 42:421 – 428.
• Lott, W. L., J. P.Nery, J .R .Gall and J. C. Medcoff. 1956. Leaf Analysis Technique in Coffee Research. I.B.E.C Research Inst. Publisch, No:9.
• Masuda, M. and K. Gomi. 1984. Mineral absorption and oxygen consumption in grafted and non-grafted cucumbers. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 52:414–419.
• Mench, M. J. S. and S. Fargues. 1994. Metal uptake by iron efficient and inefficient oats. Plant and Soil, 165:227-233.
• Mıller, G. 2002. Home and Garden Information Center (Excerpted from Home Vegetable Gardening, EC 570, 2002). County Extension Agent, Clemson University, ABD. http://hgic.clemson.edu/factsheets/hgic1325.htm. (Access date: September 2013).
• Nielsen, G. and F. Kappel. 1996. ‘Bing’ sweet cherry leaf nutrition is affected by rootstock. Horticultural Science, 31(7), 1169-1172.
• Petropoulos, S.A., E.M. Khah and H.C. Passam. 2012. Evaluation of rootstocks for watermelon grafting with reference to plant development, yield and fruit quality. International Journal of Plant Production, 6(4):481-489.
• Proietti, S., Y. Rouphael and G. Colla. 2008. Fruit quality of mini watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88:1107-1114.
• Pulgar, G., G. Villora, D. A. Morena and L. Romero. 2000. Improving the mineral nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: Nitrogen metobolizm. Biologica Plantarum, 43(4):607-609.
• Qi, H.Y, Y. F. Liu, D. Li and T.L. Li. 2006. Effects of grafting on nutrient absorption, hormone content in xylemexudation and yield ofmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Plant Physiology Communications, 42:199–202.
• Reuter, D.J. and J.B. Robınson. 1986. Plant Analysis: An Interpretation Manual. Melbourne, Sydney: Inkata Press. p.218.
• Reuterberg, E. and F. Kremkus. 1951. Bestimmung von Gesamthumus und Alkalischen Humusstoffen im Boden, Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Düng. und Bodenkd. Verlag Chemie GmbH, Weinheim.
• Rivard, C.L. and F. J. Louws. 2008. Grafting to manage soilborne diseases in heirloom tomato production. Horticultural Science, 43:2104-2111.
• Rivero, R. M., J.M. Ruiz and L. Romero. 2003. Role of grafting in horticultural plants under stres conditions. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 1 (1): 70-74).
• Rouphael, Y. M., E.R. Carderelli and G. Colla. 2008. Grafting of cucumber as a means to minimize copper toxicity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63: 49-58.
• Rouphael, Y., D. Schwarz, A. Krumbein and G. Colla. 2010. Impact of Grafting on Product Quality of Fruit Vegetables. Scientia Horticulturae, 127:172–179.
• Ruiz, J.M., A. Belakbir and L. Romero. 1996. Foliar level of phosphorus and its bioindicators in Cucumis melo grafted plants. A possible effect of rootstocks. Journal of Plant Physiology, 149:400-4004.
• Ruiz, J. M., A. Belakbir, I. López-Cantarero and L. Romero. 1997. Leaf macronutrient content and yield in grafted melon plants. A model to evaluate the influence of rootstocks genotype. Scientia Horticulturae, 71: 227-234.
• Salehi, R., A. Kashi, J.M. Lee, M. Babalar, M. Delshad, S. G. Lee and Y.C. Huh. 2010. Leaf gas exchanges and mineral ion composition in xylem sap of iranian melon affected by rootstocks and training methods. Horticultural Science, 45:766–770.
• Santa-Cruz A., M. M. Martinez–Rodriguez, F. Perez-Alfocca, R. Romero-Aranda, M.C. Bolarin. 2002. The rootstock effect of the tomato salinity response depends on the shoot genotype. Plant Science, 162:825-831.
• SAS, 1996. Statical Analysis System. Institute Inc. SAS Version. 6.12. Cary NC, (Computer program).
• Savvas, D., G. Collab, Y. Rouphael and D. Schwarzd. 2010. Amelioration of heavy metal and nutrient stress in fruit vegetables by grafting. Scientia Horticulturae, 127:156-161.
• Slawin, W. 1968. Atomic Absorbtion Spectroscopy. Interscience Publishers, New York–London- Sydney.
• Sun, S., Y. S. Tian, D. Leng, X. Li, S.L. Yuan and G.M. Xing. 2010. Effects of different kinds of rootstocks on economic yields and mineral nutrition contents of leaves of grafted watermelon seedlings. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXG201001004. htm (Access date:January 2011).
• Tokgöz, H., M. Gölükcü, R. Toker, D.Y. Turgut. 2015. Effects of grafting and harvesting time on some physical and chemical parameters of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Gıda, 40 (5): 263-270.
• Turhan, A., N. Özmen, H. Kuşcu, M.S. Şerbetci and V. Şeniz. 2012. Influence of rootstocks on yield and fruit chracteristics and quality of watermelon. Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnology, 53(4):336-341.
• Uygur, V. and H. Yetişir. 2009. Effect of rootstocks on some growth parameters, phosphorus and Nitrogen uptake by watermelon under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32:629-643.
• Yadav, A.C., B.R. Batra and M. L. Pandıta. 1989. Studies on small moisture regimes and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and quality of watermelon var. sugar baby. Haryana Journal of Agronomy, 5(2): 143-147.
• Yetişir, H., G. Yarşi and N. Sarı. 2004. Grafting in Vegetables. Bahçe, 33(1-2): 27-37.
• Zekri M and Parsons L R (1992). Salinity tolerance of citrus rootstocks: Effect of salt on root and leaf mineral concentration. Plant and Soil, 147: 171-181.
• Zhu, J., Z.L. Bie, Y. Huang and X.Y. Han. 2006. Effect of different grafting methods on the grafting work efficiency and growth of cucumber seedling. China Vegetable, 9:24-25.
• Zhu, J., Z.L. Bie, Y. Huang and X. Y. Han. 2008. Effect of grafting on the growth and ion concentrations of cucumber seedlings under NaCl stress. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 54:895–902.