Year 2019, Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 76 - 83 2019-06-30

Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions

Hasan Haliloğlu [1] , Vedat Beyyavaş [2]

37 165

This study was carried out to determine the yield, yield components and oil ratio of some canola cultivars under semi-arid conditions. Trials were established in the trial field of Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University in randomized complete blocks trial design as 3 replications. In the experiment, Licord, Es-Astrid, Embleme, Eldo, Elvis, EGC-102, Licrown, Bristol, Es-Nectas and Es-Hydromel winter cultivars were used. In the results of study; the highest seed yield was obtained from Elvis cultivar (2270.3 and 2081.7 kg ha-1) in two years of the experiment. According to the results of two years between the cultivars; the plant height was from 125.13 to 146.57 cm, number of branches 3.83-5.76 (per plant-1), number of pods 115.20-194.73 (per plant-1), number of seeds 21.00-27.30 (per pod-1), 1000 seed weight 3.07-3.78 g, oil ratio 27.16-44.96%, number of flowering days 157-169, and the number of maturation days was from 198 to 214. Because of seed yield and especially oil ratio were observed very high, Elvis variety can be recommended in conditions of less rainfall areas with limited irrigation facilities.
Canola, cultivar, yield, pod, oil ratio
  • Ahmed, J., Leghari, S.K., Baloch, A., Sarangzai, M., Saeed, M., Igbal, M., Yagoob, M., Ahmed, S., Ur-Rahman, S. and Danish, M.Z., 2016. Impacts of climatic condition on different Brassica genotypes growth and productivities. Pure Appl. Biol., 5 (3): 594-600.
  • Aminpanah, H., 2013. Effect of nitrogen rate on seed yield protein and oil content of two conola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Acta Agricultura Slovenica, 101:183-190.
  • Anonymous, 2012. GAP Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Toprak Analiz Laboratuvarı kayıtları.
  • Anonymous, 2013. Şanlıurfa Meteoroloji İl Müdürlüğü kayıtları.
  • Anonymous, 2016. Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Services. USA.
  • Başalma, D., 1997, Adaptation of Germany originated winter rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) cultivars under Ankara conditions. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 3 (3): 57-62.
  • Başalma, D., 2004. Kışlık kolza (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) çeşitlerinin Ankara koşullarında verim ve verim öğeleri yönünden karşılaştırılması. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 10 (2): 211-217.
  • Becker, H., 1993. Pflanzen-züchtung. Ulmer Verlag. Stuttgard, 42-43.
  • Bilal, M., Khan, S. A., Raza, H., Ali, F., Khan, S. H., Ali, N., Hussain, I. and Khan, J., 2015. Evaluation of some indigenous rapeseed genontypes for adaptability and yield traits in the agre-climatic conditions of Mansehra. International Journal of Biosciences, 7 (5): 127-135.
  • Bilsborrow, P.E., Evans, E.J. and Zhao, F.J., 1993. The influence of spring nitrogen on yield, yield components and glucosinolate content of autumn-sown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). J. Agric. Sci., 120: 219–224.
  • Chay, P. and Thurling, N., 1989. Variation in pod lenght in spring rape (Brassica napus L.) and its effect on seed yield and yield components. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 113(2): 139-147.
  • Coşgun, B. and Öztürk, Ö., 2015. Konya koşullarında bazı kışlık kolza çeşitlerinde tohum verimi ve verim unsurlarının belirlenmesi. Türkiye 11. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi (7-10 Eylül 2015, Çanakkale). Poster Bildiriler, 510-513.
  • Degenhardt, D.F. and Kondra, Z.P., 1981. The influence of seeding date and seeding rate on seed yield and yield components of five genotypes of Brassica napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciense, 61:175-183
  • Doğan, K. and Zincirlioğlu, M., 1982. Kolza tohumu küspesinin protein kalitesi ve kasaplık piliç rasyonlarında kullanılma olanakları üzerinde araştırmalar. Doğa Bilim Dergisi, 9 (1): 1985.
  • Durrett, T.P., Benning, C. and Ohlrogge, J., 2008. Plant triacylglycerols as feedsocks fort he production of biofuels. Plant J., 54: 593-607.
  • Gizlenci, Ş. and Acar, M., 2007. Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi sahil ve geçit kuşağında bazı kolza çeşitlerinin verim ve verim unsurlarının belirlenmesi. Türkiye VII: Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. 25-27 Haziran 2007, Erzurum.
  • Gizlenci, Ş., Acar, M., Özçelik, H. and Öner, E.K., 2011. Karadeniz Bölgesi sahil kuşağında bazı kolza çeşit ve hatlarının verim ve verim unsurlarının saptanması. Türkiye 9. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. 12-15 Eylül 2011, Bursa.
  • Gizlenci, Ş., Acar, M. and Öner, E.K., 2013. Bazı kolza (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) hat ve çeşitlerinin Amasya koşullarında performanslarının belirlenmesi. Türkiye 10. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi. 10-13 Eylül 2013, Konya.
  • Hodgsen, A.S., 1979. Rapeseed adaptation in northern new South wales, III. Yield componentsand grain quality of B. campestris and B. napus in relation to planting date, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 30: 19-27.
  • İncekara, F., Schuster, W. and Tuğay, M.E., 1983. Çeşitli yağ bitkilerinde kimi nicelik özelliklerinin kalıtsal yapıya ve çevreye bağlı değişimi. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay. No: 437.
  • Jawad, M., Islam, M., Khan, B., Anjum., Hussain, Z., Shah, W.A., Amin, R., Ali, J., Ishaq, M. and Ur Rehman, A., 2017. Growth and yield attributes of canola varietes under different seed rates. Pure Appl. Biol., 6(3):864-870.
  • Jenkins, P.D. and Leitch, M.H., 1986. Effect of sowing date on the growth and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Sgricultural Science. 105 (2): 405-420.
  • Khan, B., Jawad, M., Ahmad, M., Islam, M., Anjum., Yar, M., Ilyas, M., Kakar, H.A., Khan, S.N. and Fahad, S., 2018. Effect of seed rates on yield and oil components of canola genotypes. Pure Appl. Biol., 7 (2):500-508.
  • Kolsarıcı, Ö., 1987. Bitkisel yağ açığımızda kolzanın yeri. TÜBİTAK, Bilim ve Teknik 20 (237): 7-9.
  • Noreen, S., Noor, S., Ahmed, S., Bibi F. and Hasanuzzaman, M., 2016. Quantifying same physiological and productivity indices of canola (Brassica napus L.) crop under an arid envoriment, Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici. 44 (1): 272-279.
  • Öğütçü, Z. and Kolsarıcı, Ö., 1978. Ankara iklim koşullarında yetiştirilen yabancı kökenli yazlık kolza çeşitlerinin verim komponentleri üzerine araştırmalar. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı, 28 (2): 521-536.
  • Öğütçü, Z.,1979. Orta Anadolu koşullarında yetiştirilen kolza (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) çeşitlerinin verim ve kaliteye ilişkin karekterleri. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yayınları. 717. Bilimsel Araştırma ve İncelemeler: 417s. Ankara.
  • Öz, E.S., 2013. Bazı yazlık kolza (kanola) çeşit ve hatlarının Bornova koşullarında kışlık ve yazlık olarak performanslarının belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. E.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Özer, H. and Oral, E., 1997. Erzurum ekolojik koşullarında bazı kolza (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) çeşitlerinin fenolojik özellikleri ile verim ve verim unsurları üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Agriculture and Foresty, 21: 319-325.
  • Schuler T.J., Hutcheson, D.S. and Downey, R.K., 1992. Heterosis in inter-varietal hybrids of summer turnip rape in Western Canada. Can J. Plant Sci., 72: 127-136.
  • Schuster, W., 1970. Deviation in fat content of different oil plants. I. Winter rape and sunflower. Field Crops Abst., 23 (1):85.
  • Süzer, S., 2012. Kanola yetiştiriciliği. Tarım Gündem Dergisi, 2 (10): 70-72.
  • Süzer S., 2014. Effects of plant nutrition on canola (Brassica napus L.) growth. Balkan Agriculture Congress 08-11 September 2014, Edirne, Turkey.
  • Süzer, S., 2016. Determination of Yield and Yield Components of Some Advanced Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Varieties in Edirne Conditions. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops, 2: 142-148.
  • Uğur, A.E., 2012. Türkiye’de yağlı tohum bitkileri üretimi ve bitkisel yağ sanayi, YABİTED I. Bitkisel Yağ Kongresi, 12-14 Nisan 2012, İstanbul.
  • Uyanık, M. and Kara, Ş.M., 2011. Tarımsal üretim planlamasında ihmal edilen stratejik bitkiler: yağlı tohumlar. Uluslararası Katılımlı 1. Ali Numan Kıraç Tarım Kongresi ve Fuarı (27-30 Nisan 2011, Eskişehir).
  • Tan, A.Ş., 2009. Yield Potential of Some Rapeseed (Canola) Cultivars in Menemen Conditions. Anadolu, ANADOLU, J. of AARI, 19 (2): 1-32.
  • Tan, A.Ş., Aldemir, M. and Altunok, A., 2016. Aegean Region canola research project. 2015/16 development report. Aegean Agricultural Research Institute. Menemen, İzmir Turkey
  • Tan, A.Ş., Aldemir, M. and Memiş, A.A., 2017. Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Quality Characteristics of some Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Candidate Varieties in Menemen, Izmir Ecological Conditions. Anadolu Journal of AARI, 27 (1): 29 – 50.
  • Türkeç, A., Göksoy, A. and Turan, M., 1993. Kanolada en uygun ekim normunun saptanması üzerinde araştırma, Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10: 163-172.
  • Zukalova, H., Vasak, J. and Fabry, A., 1985. Changes in the quality characteristics of winter rape cultivars free from erusic acid glucosinolates. Czechoslovakia 31 (79): 685-692.
Primary Language en
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Author: Hasan Haliloğlu (Primary Author)

Author: Vedat Beyyavaş

Dates

Publication Date: June 30, 2019

Bibtex @research article { alinterizbd543434, journal = {Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science}, issn = {2564-7814}, eissn = {2587-2249}, address = {Adem Yavuz SÖNMEZ}, year = {2019}, volume = {34}, pages = {76 - 83}, doi = {10.28955/alinterizbd.543434}, title = {Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions}, key = {cite}, author = {Haliloğlu, Hasan and Beyyavaş, Vedat} }
APA Haliloğlu, H , Beyyavaş, V . (2019). Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science, 34 (1), 76-83. DOI: 10.28955/alinterizbd.543434
MLA Haliloğlu, H , Beyyavaş, V . "Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions". Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science 34 (2019): 76-83 <http://dergipark.org.tr/alinterizbd/issue/44004/543434>
Chicago Haliloğlu, H , Beyyavaş, V . "Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions". Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science 34 (2019): 76-83
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions AU - Hasan Haliloğlu , Vedat Beyyavaş Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.28955/alinterizbd.543434 DO - 10.28955/alinterizbd.543434 T2 - Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 76 EP - 83 VL - 34 IS - 1 SN - 2564-7814-2587-2249 M3 - doi: 10.28955/alinterizbd.543434 UR - https://doi.org/10.28955/alinterizbd.543434 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions %A Hasan Haliloğlu , Vedat Beyyavaş %T Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions %D 2019 %J Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science %P 2564-7814-2587-2249 %V 34 %N 1 %R doi: 10.28955/alinterizbd.543434 %U 10.28955/alinterizbd.543434
ISNAD Haliloğlu, Hasan , Beyyavaş, Vedat . "Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions". Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science 34 / 1 (June 2019): 76-83. https://doi.org/10.28955/alinterizbd.543434
AMA Haliloğlu H , Beyyavaş V . Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science. 2019; 34(1): 76-83.
Vancouver Haliloğlu H , Beyyavaş V . Determination of Yield, Yield Components and Oil Ratio of Some Winter Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars under Semi-Arid Conditions. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science. 2019; 34(1): 83-76.