Year 2015, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 59 - 66 2015-01-09

International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book
International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book

Seçkin Köstem [1]

256 2083

Akif Okur and Hakan Övünç Ongur argue in Chapter 8 that Turkey’s troubled relationship with American hegemony has been established through the interaction of ideas, material opportunities, and institutions. Drawing attention to the discursive construction of Turkey’s
  • Aktürk, Şener. Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  • Aydınlı, Ersel, and Julie Matthews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory of Anatolia.” Review of International Studies 34, no. 4 (October 2008): 693-712.
  • Aytaç, S. Erdem, and Ziya Öniş. “Varieties of Populism in a Changing Global Context: The Divergent Paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo.” Comparative Politics 47, no. 1 (October 2014): 41-59.
  • Checkel, Jeffrey. “Theoretical Pluralism in IR: Possibilities and Limits.” In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd Edition, edited by Beth A. Simmons, Thomas Risse, and Walter Carlsnaes, 220- 41. London: Sage Publications, 2013.
  • Dunne, Tim, Lene Hansen, and Colin Wight. “The End of International Relations Theory?” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (September 2013): 405-25.
  • Hopf, Ted. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policy, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
  • Kayaoğlu, Turan. Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, Ottoman Empire and China. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • -- . “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 10 (2010): 193- 217.
  • Katzenstein, Peter, and Rudra Sil. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
  • Rumelili, Bahar. “Constructing Identity and Relating to Difference: Understanding the EU’s Mode of Differentiation.” Review of International Studies 30, no. 1 (January 2004): 27-47.
  • -- . “Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisinde Yerel-Görüşlülük ve Doğu’nun Özneselliği.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 6, no. 3 (Fall 2009): 45-71.
  • Zarakol, Ayşe. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • -- . “What Made the Modern World Hang Together: Socialisation or Stigmatisation?” International Theory 6, no. 2 (July 2014): 311-32.
Primary Language tr
Subjects Social
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author: Seçkin Köstem

Dates

Publication Date: January 9, 2015

Bibtex @ { allazimuth167333, journal = {All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace}, issn = {2146-7757}, address = {Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, İhsan Doğramacı Peace Foundation}, year = {2015}, volume = {4}, pages = {59 - 66}, doi = {10.20991/allazimuth.167333}, title = {International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book}, key = {cite}, author = {Köstem, Seçkin} }
APA Köstem, S . (2015). International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 4 (1), 59-66. DOI: 10.20991/allazimuth.167333
MLA Köstem, S . "International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book". All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 4 (2015): 59-66 <http://dergipark.org.tr/allazimuth/issue/15905/167333>
Chicago Köstem, S . "International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book". All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 4 (2015): 59-66
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book AU - Seçkin Köstem Y1 - 2015 PY - 2015 N1 - doi: 10.20991/allazimuth.167333 DO - 10.20991/allazimuth.167333 T2 - All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 59 EP - 66 VL - 4 IS - 1 SN - 2146-7757- M3 - doi: 10.20991/allazimuth.167333 UR - https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167333 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book %A Seçkin Köstem %T International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book %D 2015 %J All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace %P 2146-7757- %V 4 %N 1 %R doi: 10.20991/allazimuth.167333 %U 10.20991/allazimuth.167333
ISNAD Köstem, Seçkin . "International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book". All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 4 / 1 (January 2015): 59-66. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167333
AMA Köstem S . International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace. 2015; 4(1): 59-66.
Vancouver Köstem S . International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace. 2015; 4(1): 66-59.