BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

FİRMA BÜYÜKLÜĞÜNÜN HİSSE SENEDİ GETİRİLERİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 327 - 339, 18.02.2010

Öz

Hisse senedi getirilerine etki eden faktörler konusunda yapılan
çalışmalarda ele alınan değişkenlere Banz (1981) firma büyüklüğü değişkenini de
eklemiştir. Bu alanda yapılan çalışmalarda ele alınan dönemlerde ortalama
getiriler veya anormal getirilerin küçük firmalar açısından daha büyük olduğu
ortaya çıkmıştır. Getiriler üzerinde firma büyüklüğü etkisi çalışmaları bu etkinin
dünya menkul kıymet piyasalarında geçerli bir etki olduğunu göstermiştir.
Yapılan pek çok çalışmada test dönemleri oluşturularak etkinin her dönemde var
olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada öncelikle ele alınan dönemde Ocak
etkisi ortaya konmaya çalışılmış, ardından küçük-orta ve büyük ayrımı yapılarak
firma büyüklüğü etkisi ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. 2000–2006 yıllarının ele
alındığı çalışmada Eview’s 5,0 programı kullanılarak yapılan analizler sonucunda
getiriler üzerinde Ocak etkisi gözlenmezken, önceki çalışmaları destekler nitelikte
küçük firmaların büyük firmalara oranla daha fazla getiri sağladığı ortaya
çıkmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Akdeniz Levent, Aslıhan Altay ve Kürşat Aydoğan, (2000) “Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns in ISE”, Russian & East European Finance & Trade, c:36, ss:6–26.
  • Aksu Mine H. ve Türkan Önder, (2000) “The Size and Book-to-Market effects and Their Role as Risk Proxies in the Istanbul Stock Exchange”, EFMA 2000 Athens; Koc University, Graduate School of Business, Working Paper No:2000–04.
  • Banz R. W., (1981) “The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, c:9, s:1, pp:3-18.
  • Banz R. W., Breen W. J., (1986) “Sample-Dependent Results Using Accounting and Market Data: Some Evidence”, The Journal of Finance, C.41, S.4, pp:779-793.
  • Barber Brad M. and John D. Lyon, (1997) “Firm Size, Book-to-Market Ratio and Security Returns: A Holdout Sample of Financial Firms”, The Journal of Finance, C.52, S.2, pp:875–883.
  • Basu Sanjoy, (1983) “The Relationship Between Earnings’ Yield, Market Value and Return for NYSE Common Stock”, Journal of Financial Economics, S:12, pp:129–156.
  • Bauman Scott W., C. Mitchell Conover and Rober E. Miller, (2001) “The Performance of Growth Stocks and Value Stocks in The Pasific Basin”, Review of Pasific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, c:4, S:2, pp:95- 108.
  • Berges A., J McConnel, G. G. Schlarbaum, (1984) “An Investigation on the Turn-of-the-Year Effect and the Tax-Loss-Selling Pressure Hypothesis in Canadian Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, 39, pp:185-192.
  • Bhandari L. C., (1988) “Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Retuns: Emprical Evidence” The Journal of Finance, C.47, S.2, pp: 507- 528.
  • Bhardwaj R. and L. Brooks, (1993) “Dual Betas From Bull and Bear Markets: Reversal of The Size Effect”, Journal of Financial Research, 16, pp:269– 283.
  • Bildik Recep ve Güzhan Gülay, (2002) “Profitability of Contrarian and Momentum Strategies: Evidence From The Istanbul Stock Exchange”, EFMA 2002 London Meetings.
  • Chan K. C., Nai-Fu Chan and David A. Hsieh, (1985) “An Exploratory Investigation of The Firm Size Effect”, Journal of Financial Economics, S: 14, pp:451-471.
  • Chan K. C. and Nai-Fu Chen, (1991) “Structural and Return Characteristics of Small and Large Firms”, The Journal of Finance, c:46, S:4, pp:1467– 1484.
  • Claessnes Stijn, Susmita Dasgupta and Jack Glen, (1995) “The Cross-Section of Stock Returns: Evidence of Emerging Markets”, Policy Research Working Paper, pp:1505.
  • Cook T. J., Rozeff M. S., (1984) “Size and Earnings/Price Ratio Anomalies: One Effect or Two?”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, C. 19, S. 4, pp: 449-464.
  • Drew Micheal E. and Madhu Veeraraghavan, (2002) “A Closer Look At The Size and Value Premium In Emerging Markets: Evidence From The Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange”, Asian Economic Journal, c:16, S:4, pp:337–351.
  • Elfakhani, Lockwood ve Zaher , (1998) “Small Firm and Value Effects in The Canadian Stock Market” The Journal of Financial Research, fall 1998,
  • http://robinson.gsu.edu/jfr/Fall%201998%20Issue%20Abstracts.htm 06.12.2007.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1992) “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, C:47, pp:427-465.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1995) “Size and Book to Market Factors in Earnings Returns”, The Journal of Finance, C.50, pp:131-155.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1996) “Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies”, The Journal of Finance, C.51, pp:55-84.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1998) “Value Versus Growth: The International Evidence”, The Journal of Finance, C.53, pp:1975-1999.
  • Gönenç Halit ve Mehmet Baha Karan, (2001) “Do Value Stocks Earn Higer Returns Than Growth Stocks in an Emerging Market? Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange”, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, c:14, S:1, ss:1–25.
  • Herrera M. and L. J. Lockwood, (1994) “The Size Effect in the Mexican Stock Market”, Journal of Banking and Finance, C.18, S.4, pp:621–632.
  • Jaffe Jeffrey, Donald B. Keim and Randolj Westerfield, (1989) “Earning Yields, Market Values and Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, c:44, S:1, pp:135–148.
  • Jegadeesh N., (1992) “Does Market Risk Really Expalin Size Effect?”, The Journal of Quantitative Analysis, C.27, S:3, pp:337-351.
  • Keim D., (1983) “Size Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality: Further Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, c:12, s:1, pp:13-32.
  • Reinganum, Marc R., (1981) “Misspecification of Capital Asset Pricing: Empirical Anomalies Based on Earnings’ Yields and Market Values”, Journal of Financial Economics, S:9, pp:19-46.
  • Reinganum M., (1982) “A direct Test of Roll’s Conjecture on The Firm Size Effect”, The Journal of Finance, c:37, s:1, pp:27-35.
  • Roll R., (1981) “A Possible Explanation of The Small Firm Effect”, The Journal of Finance, c:36, s:4, pp:879-888.
  • Tseng K. C., (1988) “Low Price, Price-Earnings Ratio, Market Value and Abnormal Stock Returns”, The Financial Review, C.23, S.3, pp:333-343.
  • Yalçıner Kürşat ve Derviş Boztosun, (2005) “Hisse Senedi Getirilerini Açıklamada Firma Büyüklüğü, Hisse Senedi Betası ve Piyasa Değeri/Defter Değeri Oranının Etkinliği”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt:7, Sayı:2, Haziran 2005, ss:39–50.
  • Yıldırım Nuri, “Firma Büyüklüğü ve Defter Değeri-Piyasa Değeri Etkileri: İMKB Örneği”, İMKB Dergisi, Yıl 8 Sayı: 31.
Yıl 2008, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 327 - 339, 18.02.2010

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Akdeniz Levent, Aslıhan Altay ve Kürşat Aydoğan, (2000) “Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns in ISE”, Russian & East European Finance & Trade, c:36, ss:6–26.
  • Aksu Mine H. ve Türkan Önder, (2000) “The Size and Book-to-Market effects and Their Role as Risk Proxies in the Istanbul Stock Exchange”, EFMA 2000 Athens; Koc University, Graduate School of Business, Working Paper No:2000–04.
  • Banz R. W., (1981) “The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, c:9, s:1, pp:3-18.
  • Banz R. W., Breen W. J., (1986) “Sample-Dependent Results Using Accounting and Market Data: Some Evidence”, The Journal of Finance, C.41, S.4, pp:779-793.
  • Barber Brad M. and John D. Lyon, (1997) “Firm Size, Book-to-Market Ratio and Security Returns: A Holdout Sample of Financial Firms”, The Journal of Finance, C.52, S.2, pp:875–883.
  • Basu Sanjoy, (1983) “The Relationship Between Earnings’ Yield, Market Value and Return for NYSE Common Stock”, Journal of Financial Economics, S:12, pp:129–156.
  • Bauman Scott W., C. Mitchell Conover and Rober E. Miller, (2001) “The Performance of Growth Stocks and Value Stocks in The Pasific Basin”, Review of Pasific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, c:4, S:2, pp:95- 108.
  • Berges A., J McConnel, G. G. Schlarbaum, (1984) “An Investigation on the Turn-of-the-Year Effect and the Tax-Loss-Selling Pressure Hypothesis in Canadian Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, 39, pp:185-192.
  • Bhandari L. C., (1988) “Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Retuns: Emprical Evidence” The Journal of Finance, C.47, S.2, pp: 507- 528.
  • Bhardwaj R. and L. Brooks, (1993) “Dual Betas From Bull and Bear Markets: Reversal of The Size Effect”, Journal of Financial Research, 16, pp:269– 283.
  • Bildik Recep ve Güzhan Gülay, (2002) “Profitability of Contrarian and Momentum Strategies: Evidence From The Istanbul Stock Exchange”, EFMA 2002 London Meetings.
  • Chan K. C., Nai-Fu Chan and David A. Hsieh, (1985) “An Exploratory Investigation of The Firm Size Effect”, Journal of Financial Economics, S: 14, pp:451-471.
  • Chan K. C. and Nai-Fu Chen, (1991) “Structural and Return Characteristics of Small and Large Firms”, The Journal of Finance, c:46, S:4, pp:1467– 1484.
  • Claessnes Stijn, Susmita Dasgupta and Jack Glen, (1995) “The Cross-Section of Stock Returns: Evidence of Emerging Markets”, Policy Research Working Paper, pp:1505.
  • Cook T. J., Rozeff M. S., (1984) “Size and Earnings/Price Ratio Anomalies: One Effect or Two?”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, C. 19, S. 4, pp: 449-464.
  • Drew Micheal E. and Madhu Veeraraghavan, (2002) “A Closer Look At The Size and Value Premium In Emerging Markets: Evidence From The Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange”, Asian Economic Journal, c:16, S:4, pp:337–351.
  • Elfakhani, Lockwood ve Zaher , (1998) “Small Firm and Value Effects in The Canadian Stock Market” The Journal of Financial Research, fall 1998,
  • http://robinson.gsu.edu/jfr/Fall%201998%20Issue%20Abstracts.htm 06.12.2007.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1992) “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, C:47, pp:427-465.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1995) “Size and Book to Market Factors in Earnings Returns”, The Journal of Finance, C.50, pp:131-155.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1996) “Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies”, The Journal of Finance, C.51, pp:55-84.
  • Fama E. F. and French K. R., (1998) “Value Versus Growth: The International Evidence”, The Journal of Finance, C.53, pp:1975-1999.
  • Gönenç Halit ve Mehmet Baha Karan, (2001) “Do Value Stocks Earn Higer Returns Than Growth Stocks in an Emerging Market? Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange”, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, c:14, S:1, ss:1–25.
  • Herrera M. and L. J. Lockwood, (1994) “The Size Effect in the Mexican Stock Market”, Journal of Banking and Finance, C.18, S.4, pp:621–632.
  • Jaffe Jeffrey, Donald B. Keim and Randolj Westerfield, (1989) “Earning Yields, Market Values and Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, c:44, S:1, pp:135–148.
  • Jegadeesh N., (1992) “Does Market Risk Really Expalin Size Effect?”, The Journal of Quantitative Analysis, C.27, S:3, pp:337-351.
  • Keim D., (1983) “Size Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality: Further Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, c:12, s:1, pp:13-32.
  • Reinganum, Marc R., (1981) “Misspecification of Capital Asset Pricing: Empirical Anomalies Based on Earnings’ Yields and Market Values”, Journal of Financial Economics, S:9, pp:19-46.
  • Reinganum M., (1982) “A direct Test of Roll’s Conjecture on The Firm Size Effect”, The Journal of Finance, c:37, s:1, pp:27-35.
  • Roll R., (1981) “A Possible Explanation of The Small Firm Effect”, The Journal of Finance, c:36, s:4, pp:879-888.
  • Tseng K. C., (1988) “Low Price, Price-Earnings Ratio, Market Value and Abnormal Stock Returns”, The Financial Review, C.23, S.3, pp:333-343.
  • Yalçıner Kürşat ve Derviş Boztosun, (2005) “Hisse Senedi Getirilerini Açıklamada Firma Büyüklüğü, Hisse Senedi Betası ve Piyasa Değeri/Defter Değeri Oranının Etkinliği”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt:7, Sayı:2, Haziran 2005, ss:39–50.
  • Yıldırım Nuri, “Firma Büyüklüğü ve Defter Değeri-Piyasa Değeri Etkileri: İMKB Örneği”, İMKB Dergisi, Yıl 8 Sayı: 31.
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil tr; en
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mukadder Horasan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Şubat 2010
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2008 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Horasan, M. (2010). FİRMA BÜYÜKLÜĞÜNÜN HİSSE SENEDİ GETİRİLERİNE ETKİSİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 327-339.

Creative Commons Lisansı
ATASOBEDAtatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.