Year 2018, Volume , Issue 14, Pages 378 - 387 2018-12-31

Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle

Hüseyin Turan Arat [1]

86 192

The motor / generator instrument, which is the one of the key important components of hybrid electric vehicles, influence vehicle efficiency and emission scale with its types and features. For that reason, the electric motor (electric machine-EM) selection and identification are playing a crucial role. In this simulation study, effects of two different motors, Induction and Permanent Magnet (IM and PM) to emission and performance were compared for two driving cycles (FTP75 and NEDC) on a serial configuration hybrid electric vehicle which modeled with AVL Cruise. The general purpose of the work is, selecting electric motors that they have same output powers although the rotational speeds are different; and modeled for the same vehicle and identifing the effects of different driving cycles on the vehicles were compared. HEVs performance and emission results illustrated and electric machines performances and efficiency maps are graphically charted. Overall performance and emission outputs for two different driving cycles are discussed detailed. Also, a general concluded summary table that related the performance and emission outputs of different machines usage is presented. As a result, according to these modeling and test results, PM motor is more efficient than IM motor on overall simulation results, especially decreases the emission values at high speeds. 

The motor / generator instrument, which is the one of the key important components of hybrid electric vehicles, influence vehicle efficiency and emission scale with its types and features. For that reason, the electric motor (electric machine-EM) selection and identification are playing a crucial role. In this simulation study, effects of two different motors, Induction and Permanent Magnet (IM and PM) to emission and performance were compared for two driving cycles (FTP75 and NEDC) on a serial configuration hybrid electric vehicle which modeled with AVL Cruise. The general purpose of the work is, selecting electric motors that they have same output powers although the rotational speeds are different; and modeled for the same vehicle and identifing the effects of different driving cycles on the vehicles were compared. HEVs performance and emission results illustrated and electric machines performances and efficiency maps are graphically charted. Overall performance and emission outputs for two different driving cycles are discussed detailed. Also, a general concluded summary table that related the performance and emission outputs of different machines usage is presented. As a result, according to these modeling and test results, PM motor is more efficient than IM motor on overall simulation results, especially decreases the emission values at high speeds. 

  • “Global Automotive Executive Survey”, (2017). KPMG’s 18th Consecutive, 2017.
  • Varga, B., “Energy management of electric and hybrid vehicles dependent on powertrain configuration,” Open Engineering, 2(2), 253-263, 2012.
  • Arata, M., Kurihara, Y., Misu, D., & Matsubara, M., “EV and HEV motor development in TOSHIBA,” IEE Journal of Industry Applications, 4(3), 152-157, 2015.
  • Minav,T.,”Basics of power electronics and electric motors for hybrid and electric vehicles,” Course Notes, Aalto University, 2012.
  • Arora, A. S., Singh G. ., “Review of design and performance of permament magnet synchronous motor,” Proceedings of TheIRES 6th International Conference, Melbourne, Australia. ISBN: 978-93-85465-75-8, 2015.
  • Zhu, Z. Q., Chu, W. Q., & Guan, Y. ., “Quantitative comparison of electromagnetic performance of electrical machines for HEVs/EVs,” CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 1(1), 37-47, 2017.
  • Guzzella, L., Sciarretta, A., “Vehicle propulsion systems: introduction to modeling and optimization,”.Third edition, Springer – Verlag, Berlin publisher. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-35913-2, 2007.
  • Hasan, S. M. (2008). “Hybrid electric vehicle powertrain: on-line parameter estimation of an induction motor drive and torque control of a PM BLDC starter-generator,” Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, 2008.
  • Bakshi, V., Jape V.S ., “Performance evulation and drive selection for HEV,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 3 Issue 10, ISSN: 2278-0181,2014.
  • Lebsir, A., Bentounsi, A., Rebbah, R., Belakehal, S., & Benbouzid, M. , “Comparative study of PMSM and SRM capabilities,” In Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives (POWERENG), 2013 Fourth International Conference on (pp. 760-763). IEEE, 2013.
  • Schultz J. W., Huard., S., “Comparing AC ınduction with permanent magnet motors in hybrid vehicles and the impact on the value proposition, ” Parker Hannifin Corporation, EMN Division – Automation Group 5500 Business Park Drive Rohnert Park, CA 94928, 2013.
  • Finken, T., Felden, M., & Hameyer, K., “Comparison and design of different electrical machine types regarding their applicability in hybrid electrical vehicles,” In Electrical Machines, 2008. ICEM 2008. 18th International Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE,2008.
  • Rahman, M. A., “Status review of advances in hybrid electric vehicles,” Course notes, Memorial University of Newfoundl, 2014.
  • Dorrell, D. G., Knight, A. M., Popescu, M., Evans, L., & Staton, D. A., “Comparison of different motor design drives for hybrid electric vehicles” In Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2010 IEEEpp. 3352-3359 ,2010.
  • Mahmoudi, A., Soong, W. L., Pellegrino, G., & Armando, E. , “Efficiency maps of electrical machines”. In Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2015 IEEE pp. 2791-2799., 2015.
  • De Santiago, J., Bernhoff, H., Ekergård, B., Eriksson, S., Ferhatovic, S., Waters, R., & Leijon, M. , “Electrical motor drivelines in commercial all-electric vehicles: A review”. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(2), 475-484, 2012.
  • Chau, K. T., & Li, W., “Overview of electric machines for electric and hybrid vehicles,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, 64(1), 46-71, 2014.
  • Taymaz, I., & Benli, M., “Emissions and fuel economy for a hybrid vehicle”. Fuel, 115, 812-817, 2014.
  • Alvarez, R., & Weilenmann, M., “Effect of low ambient temperature on fuel consumption and pollutant and CO2 emissions of hybrid electric vehicles in real-world conditions,” Fuel, 97, 119-124, 2012.
  • Magnussen, F., “On design and analysis of synchronous permanent magnet machines for field-weakening operation in hybrid electric vehicles” Doctoral dissertation, Elektrotekniska system, 2012.
  • Tabbache, B., Kheloui, A., & Benbouzid, M. , “Design and control of the induction motor propulsion of an electric vehicle,” Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2010 IEEE (pp. 1-6),2010.
  • Groen, B. C. ,“Investigation of DC Motors for Electric and Hybrid Electric Motor Vehicle Applications Using an Infinitely Variable Transmission,” Master of thesis, Brigham Young University, 2011.
  • Zeraoulia, M., Benbouzid, M. E. H., & Diallo, D., “Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems: A comparative study,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular technology, 55(6), 1756-1764, 2006.
  • Massey, S., “Modeling, simulation and control of hybrid electric vehicle drive while minimizing energy input requirements using optimized gear ratios,” Master of thesis, Michigan Technological University,2016.
  • Staunton, R. H., Nelson, S.C., Otaduy, P.J., McKeveer J.W., Bailey J.M., Das, S., Smith, R. L. , “ PM motor parametric design analyses for a hybrid electric vehicle traction drive application”, (No. ORNL/TM-2004/217). ORNL.,2004.
  • Livinţ, G., Horga, V., Răţoi, M., & Albu, M. , “Control of hybrid electrical vehicles. In Electric Vehicles,Modelling and Simulations”. InTech, DOI: 10.5772/16637,2011.
  • Pellegrino, G., Vagati, A., Boazzo, B., & Guglielmi, P. ,“Comparison of induction and PM synchronous motor drives for EV application including design examples,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 48(6), 2322-2332, 2012.
  • AVL Cruise,” User Guide and Datasheets,” (2015) AVL, https://www.avl.com/cruise (.04.2018)
  • Awadallah, M., Tawadros, P., Walker,P., Zhang, N., “Dynamic modelling and simulation of a manual transmission based mild hybrid vehicle,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 112, 218–239, 2017.
Primary Language en
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0002-9269-4075
Author: Hüseyin Turan Arat (Primary Author)
Institution: İSKENDERUN TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK VE DOĞA BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Country: Turkey


Dates

Publication Date: December 31, 2018

Bibtex @research article { ejosat494127, journal = {Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2148-2683}, address = {Osman SAĞDIÇ}, year = {2018}, volume = {}, pages = {378 - 387}, doi = {10.31590/ejosat.494127}, title = {Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle}, key = {cite}, author = {Arat, Hüseyin Turan} }
APA Arat, H . (2018). Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (14), 378-387. DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.494127
MLA Arat, H . "Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle". Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi (2018): 378-387 <http://dergipark.org.tr/ejosat/issue/40225/494127>
Chicago Arat, H . "Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle". Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi (2018): 378-387
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle AU - Hüseyin Turan Arat Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.31590/ejosat.494127 DO - 10.31590/ejosat.494127 T2 - Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 378 EP - 387 VL - IS - 14 SN - -2148-2683 M3 - doi: 10.31590/ejosat.494127 UR - https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.494127 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 European Journal of Science and Technology Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle %A Hüseyin Turan Arat %T Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle %D 2018 %J Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi %P -2148-2683 %V %N 14 %R doi: 10.31590/ejosat.494127 %U 10.31590/ejosat.494127
ISNAD Arat, Hüseyin Turan . "Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle". Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 14 (December 2019): 378-387. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.494127
AMA Arat H . Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 2018; (14): 378-387.
Vancouver Arat H . Numerical Comparison of Different Electric Motors (IM and PM) effects on a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 2018; (14): 387-378.