Deep Learning Applications in Hematology: Optimizing Accuracy and Robustness of Blood Cell Counting and Classification
Abstract
Processing time, variability, and accuracy are the most significant limitations of traditional methods to determine the type and count of blood cells. These limitations could be addressed by using machine learning algorithms. Advanced YOLO architectures are among the most prominent of these technologies. This study aims to compare the performance of YOLOv11 and YOLOv12 models. Additionally, the impact of attention mechanisms on detection performance and the reduction of errors caused by cell overlap and interference were analyzed. Therefore, YOLOv11 and YOLOv12 models were applied to the BCCD dataset to detect, classify, and count blood cells (RBCs, WBCs, and platelets). Data augmentation strategies were implemented to increase the training dataset size. Both models were trained using a learning rate of 0.001, a batch size of 16, and 100 training epochs. The results showed that the YOLOv12 model achieved slightly higher numerical performance than YOLOv11 by achieving a validation mAP@50 value of 95.3% and a validation recall rate of 95.2%. The statistical results indicated that these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.312). Therefore, both models provide comparable performance on the BCCD dataset. These findings suggest that both models are suitable for automated blood cell detection. However, larger and more diverse datasets are required to determine whether the observed numerical improvements generalize to broader clinical settings.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- B. George-Gay and K. Parker, “Understanding the complete blood count with differential,” J. Perianesth. Nurs., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 96–117, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1053/jpan.2003.50013.
- S. W. Lockley, L. K. Barger, N. T. Ayas, J. M. Rothschild, C. A. Czeisler, and C. P. Landrigan, “Effects of health care provider work hours and sleep deprivation on safety and performance,” Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf., vol. 33, no. 11, suppl., pp. 7–18, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33109-7.
- M. Maitra, R. K. Gupta, and M. Mukherjee, “Detection and counting of red blood cells in blood cell images using Hough transform,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 53, no. 16, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.5120/8505-2274.
- G. Moallem, A. A. Pore, A. Gangadhar, H. Sari-Sarraf, and S. A. Vanapalli, “Detection of live breast cancer cells in bright-field microscopy images containing white blood cells by image analysis and deep learning,” J. Biomed. Opt., vol. 27, no. 7, Art. no. 076003, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.27.7.076003.
- N. Zaman et al., “Deep learning models for classification of red blood cells in microscopy images for anemia diagnosis,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput., Appl. Syst. (COMPAS), 2024, doi: 10.1109/COMPAS60761.2024.10797203.
- L. Kamal and R. J. R. Raj, “Harnessing deep learning for blood quality assurance through complete blood cell count detection,” e-Prime–Adv. Electr. Eng., Electron. Energy, vol. 7, Art. no. 100450, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2024.100450.
- O. Katar and İ. F. Kılınçer, “Automatic classification of white blood cells using pre-trained deep models,” Sakarya Univ. J. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 462–476, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.35377/saucis...1196934.
- G. Drałus, D. Mazur, and A. Czmil, “Automatic detection and counting of blood cells in smear images using RetinaNet,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 11, Art. no. 1522, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/e23111522.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Computing Applications in Health
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Alhaji Osman Bah
0000-0002-3995-9468
Sierra Leone
Early Pub Date
October 28, 2026
Publication Date
October 30, 2026
Submission Date
January 26, 2026
Acceptance Date
August 25, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 5