TY - JOUR T1 - Are Foreign Direct Investments Effective on Environmental Quality in Turkey? An Approach with Non-Linear ARDL Method TT - Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Türkiye’de Çevre Kalitesi Üzerinde Etkili mi? Asimetrik ARDL Yöntemi ile Bir Yaklaşım AU - Polat, İbrahim Halil AU - Çamkaya, Serhat AU - Polat, Ümmügülsüm PY - 2022 DA - February DO - 10.25204/iktisad.1023839 JF - İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi JO - İKTİSAD PB - H. Mustafa PAKSOY WT - DergiPark SN - 2564-7466 SP - 30 EP - 46 VL - 7 IS - 17 LA - en AB - There are discussions in the literature on whether there are disadvantages in terms of environmental quality and the economic advantages provided by foreign direct investments in developing countries. These discussions, which were studied within the framework of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, have been the subject of many empirical studies. This study aims to investigate the relationship between carbon emissions, economic growth, amount of energy use, foreign direct investments, and trade openness for Turkey within the Pollution Haven Hypothesis framework and test whether the hypothesis mentioned above is valid in Turkey. In the study, the validity of the hypothesis in Turkey was tested using the NARDL method between 1970 and 2018. The findings validate that the Pollution Haven Hypothesis is valid for Turkey in the long term. It was also determined that negative shocks in growth and energy use reduce carbon emissions, while positive shocks in energy use and trade openness increase carbon emissions in the long term. The findings that the Pollution Haven Hypothesis is not valid in the short term are among the other findings obtained from the study. Also, it was determined that the negative shock in growth and trade openness and negative and positive shock in the amount of energy use are significant in the short term. KW - Environmental Quality KW - Foreign Direct Investments KW - Pollution Haven Hypothesis KW - NARDL Method N2 - Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde doğrudan yabancı yatırımların sağladığı ekonomik avantajlar ve çevre kalitesi açısından dezavantajların olup olmadığı konusunda literatürde tartışmalar bulunmaktadır. Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezi çerçevesinde incelenen bu tartışmalar birçok ampirik çalışmaya konu olmuştur. Bu çalışma, Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezi çerçevesinde Türkiye için karbon emisyonları, ekonomik büyüme, enerji kullanım miktarı, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve ticarete açıklık arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmayı ve söz konusu hipotezin Türkiye'de geçerli olup olmadığını test etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada hipotezin Türkiye'deki geçerliliği 1970-2018 yıllarına ait veriler kullanılarak NARDL yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Bulgular, Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezinin uzun vadede Türkiye için geçerli olduğunu doğrulamaktadır. Büyüme ve enerji kullanımındaki olumsuz şokların karbon emisyonlarını azalttığı, enerji kullanımı ve ticarete açıklığa yönelik pozitif şokların ise uzun vadede karbon emisyonlarını artırdığı belirlenmiştir. Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezinin kısa vadede geçerli olmadığına ilişkin bulgular da çalışmadan elde edilen diğer bulgular arasındadır. Ayrıca kısa dönemde büyüme ve ticarete açıklıktaki negatif şok ile enerji kullanım miktarındaki negatif ve pozitif şokun anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. CR - Adewuyi, A. O., and Awodumi, O. B. (2017). Biomass energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: fresh evidence from West Africa using a simultaneous equation model. Energy, 119, 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.059 CR - Akbostancı, E., Tunç, G. İ., and Türüt-Aşık, S. (2007). Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey's exports. Environment and Development Economics, 12(2), 297-322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X06003512 CR - Akçay, S. and Karasoy, A. (2018). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve karbondioksit emisyonu ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Ankara University Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 73(2), 501-526. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002507 CR - Artan, S; Hayaloğlu, P. and Seyhan, B. (2015). Türkiye’de çevre kirliliği, dışa açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 308-323. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yead/issue/21806/234380 CR - Al-Mulali, U. (2012). Factors affecting CO2 emission in the Middle East: a panel data analysis. Energy, 44, 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.045 CR - Al-Mulali, U., and Ozturk, I. (2015). The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy, 84, 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004 CR - Al-Mulali, U., and Tang, C. F. (2013). Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries. Energy Policy, 60, 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.055 CR - Assamoi, G. R., Wang, S., Liu, Y., and Gnangoin, Y. T. (2020). Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Cote D’Ivoire: evidence from Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach with structural breaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 16886–16899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08246-w CR - Azam, M., Khan, A. Q., Zaman, K., and Ahmad, M. (2015). Factors determining energy consumption: evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1123-1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.061 CR - Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., and Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00091 CR - Behera, S. R., and Dash, D. P. (2017). The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.201 CR - Chandran, V., and Tang, C. F. (2013). The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.054 CR - Chen, B. (2021). Industrial agglomeration and the pollution haven hypothesis: evidence from Chinese prefectures. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. Early online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2021.1892567 CR - Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.007 CR - Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., ve Zhang, J. (2011). Growth, foreign direct investment, and the environment: evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Regional Science, 51(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00674.x CR - Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7-71. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/002205104773558047 CR - Çınar, S., Yılmazer, M., and Aprazlı Fazlılar, T. (2012). Kirlilik yaratan sektörlerin ticareti ve çevre: gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler karşılaştırması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(2), 212-226. http://journal.dogus.edu.tr/index.php/duj/article/view/321/pdf CR - Danish, Khan, S. U.-D., and Ahmad, A. (2021). Testing the pollution haven hypothesis on the pathway of sustainable development: accounting the role of nuclear energy consumption. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. Early online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.02.008 CR - Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348 CR - Dietzenbacher, E., and Mukhopadhyay, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the pollution haven hypothesis for India: towards a green leontief paradox? Environmental and Resource Economics, 36, 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9036-9 CR - Ghouali, Y. Z., Belmokaddem, M., Sahraoui, M. A., and Guellil, M. S. (2015). Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries: a panel data analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00890-4 CR - Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Papers, 3914. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w3914 CR - Guzel, A. E., and Okumus, İ. (2020). Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: new insights from panel data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 18157-18167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08317-y CR - Hansen, H., and Rand, J. (2006). On the causal links between FDI and growth in developing countries. World Economy, 29(1), 21-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00756.x CR - He, J. (2006). Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: the case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecological Economics, 60, 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.008 CR - Hoffman, R., Lee, C.-G., Ramasamy, B., and Yeung, M. (2005). FDI and pollution: a Granger causality test using panel data. Journal of International Development, 17, 311-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1196 CR - Kearsley, A., and Riddel, M. (2010). A further inquiry into the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 69, 905-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.014 CR - Keho, Y. (2016). Do foreign direct investment and trade lead to lower energy intensity? Evidence from selected African countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(1), 1-5. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/1280 CR - Kılıçarslan, Z., and Dumrul, Y. (2017). Foreign direct investments and CO2 emissions relationship: the case of Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 8(4), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2017.73 CR - Kılıç C., and Balan, F. (2018) Is there an environmental Kuznets inverted-U shaped curve? Panoeconomicus, 65(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN150215006K CR - Kivyiro, P., and Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74, 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.025 CR - Koçak, E., and Şarkgüneşi, A. (2018). The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 790-804. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0468-2 CR - Kurt, Ü., Kılıç, C., and Özekicioğlu, H. (2019). The effect of foreign direct investments on CO2 emissions: ARDL boundary test approach for Turkey. Selcuk University Journal of Social Sciences Vocational School, 22(1), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.487139 CR - Lau, L.-S., Choong, C.-K., and Eng, Y.-K. (2014). Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy, 68, 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.002 CR - Liang, F. (2008). Does foreign direct investment harm the host country’s environment? Evidence from China. International Finance eJournal. Early online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1479864 CR - Mike, F. (2020). Kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi Türkiye için geçerli mi? ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımından bulgular. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 21(2), 107-121. http://journal.dogus.edu.tr/index.php/duj/article/view/1259 CR - Mike, F., and Kardaşlar, A. (2018). Doğrudan yabanci sermaye yatirimlarinin çevre kirliliği üzerine etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(3), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.377182 CR - Mutafoglu, T. H. (2012). Foreign direct investment, pollution, and economic growth: evidence from Turkey. Journal of Developing Societies, 28(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X12453780 CR - Nathaniel, S., Aguegboh, E., Iheonu, C., Sharma, G., and Shah, M. (2020). Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal mediterranean countries: Re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(28), 35474-354787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09521-6 CR - Neequaye, N. A., and Oladi, R. (2015). Environment, growth, and FDI revisited. International Review of Economics and Finance, 39, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.06.002 CR - Omri, A., Nguyen, D. K., and Rault, C. (2014). Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Economic Modelling, 42, 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.026 CR - Öztürk, S., and Saygin, S. (2020). Türkiye’de 1974-2016 döneminde yapısal kırılma altında kişi başına reel gelir, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, ticari açıklık ve karbon emisyonları arasındaki ilişki. Sosyoekonomi, 28(44), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.02.04 CR - Pao, H.-T., and Tsai, C.-M. (2011). Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36, 685-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041 CR - Perron, P. (1990). Testing for a unit root in a time series with a changing mean. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8(2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391977 CR - Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 CR - Rafiq, S., Salim, R., and Nielsen, I. (2016). Urbanization, openness, emissions, and energy intensity: a study of increasingly urbanized emerging economies. Energy Economics, 56, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.007 CR - Rahman, Z., Chongboa, W., and Ahmad, M. (2019). An (a)symmetric analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis in the context of Pakistan: a non-linear approach. Carbon Management, 10(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1577179 CR - Ren, S., Yuan, B., Ma, X., and Chen, X. (2014). International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Economic Review, 28, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003 CR - Sadik-Zada, E. R., and Ferrari, M. (2020). Environmental policy stringency, technical progress and pollution haven hypothesis. Sustainability, 12(9), 3880. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093880 . CR - Seker, F., Ertugrul, H. M., and Cetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.118 CR - Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., and Afza, T. (2011). Environmental consequences of economic growth and foreign direct investment: evidence from panel data analysis. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/32547/. CR - Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Abbas, F., and Anis, O. (2015). Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Economics, 51, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.014 CR - Shin, Y., Yu, B., and Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. R. Sickles, and W. Horrace (Ed.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt in (s. 281-314). Springer. CR - Singhania, M., and Saini, N. (2021). Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: role of FDI. Journal of Business Research, 123, 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.007 CR - Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., Musah, I., and Ozturk, I. (2017). Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy, 124, 706-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.089 CR - Şahinöz, A. and Fotourehchi, Z. (2014). Kirlilik emisyonu ve doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları: Türkiye için "kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi" testi. Sosyoekonomi, 21(21), 187-210. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sosyoekonomi/issue/21081/226983 CR - Tamazian, A., and Rao, B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.04.004 CR - Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., and Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 CR - Tang, C. F., and Tan, B. W. (2015). The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy, 79, 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033 CR - Waldkirch, A., and Gopinath, M. (2008). Pollution control and foreign direct investment in Mexico: an ındustry-level analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41, 289-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9192-1 CR - Wang, D. T., and Chen, W. Y. (2014). Foreign direct investment, institutional development, and environmental externalities: evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 135, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.013 CR - World Bank Open Data. (2021, 2 June). https://data.worldbank.org/ CR - Yıldırım, M., Destek, M. A., and Özsoy, F. N. (2017). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18(2), 99-111. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cumuiibf/issue/32189/330140 CR - Zheng, S., Kahn, M. E., and Liu, H. (2010). Towards a system of open cities in China: home prices, FDI flows and air quality in 35 major cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.10.003 CR - Zhu, H., Duan, L., Guo, Y., and Yu, K. (2016). The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Economic Modelling, 58, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.003 UR - https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1023839 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2082223 ER -