TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Rewiew on the Secondary Transfer Effect of Intergroup Contact
TT  - GruplarArası Temasın İkincil Aktarım Etkisi Üzerine Bir Derleme
AU  - Ünver, Halime
AU  - Cakal, Huseyin
AU  - Özkan, Zafer
AU  - Kızık, Büşra
AU  - Eraslan, Ertuğrul Gazi
PY  - 2022
DA  - August
DO  - 10.48146/odusobiad.1081427
JF  - Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi
JO  - ODÜSOBİAD
PB  - Ordu University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1309-9302
SP  - 1461
EP  - 1500
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
LA  - en
AB  - Research showed that intergroup contact could increase social cohesion with many positive changes such asimproved positive attitudes and trust as well as a decreased threat towards the groups in contact. However, faceto-face contact may be impossible in societies where intergroup conflicts are prevalent and groups are ethnically,racially, and religiously segregated. In such societies, the indirect and transferable effects of contact can be anopportunity to benefit from the positive effects of contact. One of the transferable effects of contact is the secondarytransfer effect. The secondary transfer effect (STE) refers to the generalisation of the effects of intergroup contactfrom the encountered outgroup to outgroups that do not involve in the contact situation. Therefore, it is apromising and effective strategy for prejudice reduction, particularly in ethnically, racially, and religiouslysegregated societies. In this article, we aim to review the STE literature and extend previous reviews by focusingon the problems in the STE. We first review evidence on the STE of positive versus negative contact, and then wehighlight the relevant underlying mechanism of the phenomenon, i.e., mediators and moderators of the STE.Third, we underline the problems that may limit the robustness of the phenomenon and the research gap in theSTE literature. Finally, in line with the current issues with the theory, research and practice, we presentsuggestions for future research.
KW  - Secondary Transfer Effect of Intergroup Contact
KW  - Positive Contact
KW  - Negative Contact
N2  - Araştırmalar, gruplar arası temasın, olumlu tutum ve güvenin artması gibi birçok olumlu değişiklikle beraber sosyaluyumu artırabileceğini ve aynı zamanda temas halinde olan gruplara yönelik tehdidin azalmasını sağlayabileceğinigösterdi. Ancak, gruplar arası çatışmaların hâkim olduğu ve grupların etnik, ırksal ve dinsel olarak ayrıştığıtoplumlarda yüz yüze temas imkânsız olabilir. Bu tip toplumlarda temasın olumlu etkisinden faydalanmak içintemasın dolaylı ve aktarılabilir etkileri bir fırsat olabilir. Temasın aktarılabilir etkilerinden birisi ikincil aktarımetkisidir. İkincil aktarım etkisi, gruplar arası temasın etkilerinin, temas kurulan dış gruptan temas kurulmayandiğer dış gruplara genellenmesi durumunu ifade etmektedir. Bundan dolayı ikincil aktarım etkisi, özellikle ayrışmışve çatışmalı toplumlarda gruplar arası önyargının azaltılması bakımından umut verici ve etkili bir strateji olarakdeğerlendirilmektedir. Bu makalede, ikincil aktarım etkisi ile ilgili bir derleme sunmayı ve önceki derlemeleri ikincilaktarım etkisi özelindeki problemler üzerinde durarak genişletmeyi amaçlıyoruz. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, ilk olarakhem olumlu hem de olumsuz temasın ikincil aktarım etkisi üzerine ampirik kanıtları gözden geçirdikten sonradevamında bu genelleme etkisinin altında yatan aracı ve düzenleyici mekanizmaları inceliyoruz. Üçüncü ve enönemlisi, bu olgunun güvenirliğini ve sağlamlığını olumsuz anlamda etkileyebilecek, ikincil temas, sosyal istenirlikile seçim yanlılığı ve nedensellik silsilesi gibi problemlerin ve alandaki araştırma boşluğunun altını çiziyoruz. Sonolarak, teori, araştırma ve pratik ile ilgili mevcut problemler ve alan yazındaki boşluklar doğrultusunda gelecekaraştırmalar ve araştırmacılar için önerilerimizi sunuyoruz.
CR  - Aberson, C. L. (2019). Indirect effects of threat on the contact-prejudice relationship. Social Psychology, 50(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000364
CR  - Andrews, N. P., Yogeeswaran, K., Walker, M. J., & Hewstone, M. (2018). Effect of valenced vicarious online contact on out-group prejudice and perceived out-group variability: A study of online poker. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(10), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12548
CR  - Boin, J., Rupar, M., Graf, S., Neji, S., Spiegler, O., & Swart, H. (2021). The generalization of intergroup contact effects: Emerging research, policy relevance, and future directions. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12419
CR  - Bowman, N. A., & Griffin, T. M. (2012). Secondary transfer effects of interracial contact: The moderating role of social status. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026745
CR  - Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37(37), 255–343. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065260105370055
CR  - Brylka, A., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., & Mähönen, T. A. (2016). The majority influence on interminority attitudes: The secondary transfer effect of positive and negative contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 50, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.12.007
CR  - Çakal, H., Halabi, S., Cazan, A. M., & Eller, A. (2021). Intergroup contact and endorsement of social change motivations: The mediating role of intergroup trust, perspective-taking, and intergroup anxiety among three advantaged groups in Northern Cyprus, Romania, and Israel. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219885163
CR  - Daiber, C. (2017). Attitude and Intergroup Anxiety Generalisation as Mediators of the Secondary Transfer Effect of the Contact-Prejudice Relationship among White South African Stellenbosch University Students.
CR  - Davies, K., Tropp, L. R., Aron, A., Pettigrew, T. F., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103
CR  - De Beer, H. (2015). Attitude and empathy generalisation as mediators of the secondary transfer effect amongst white South African students at Stellenbosch University. Retrieved from https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/96892%5Cnhttp://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/96892%5Cnhttps://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/10019.1/96892/2/debeer_attitude_2015.pdf
CR  - De Coninck, D., Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., & d’Haenens, L. (2020). The contact hypothesis during the European refugee crisis: Relating quality and quantity of (in)direct intergroup contact to attitudes towards refugees. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220929394
CR  - Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18(10), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x
CR  - Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002214
CR  - Eller, A., & Abrams, D. (2004). Come together : Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew ’ s reformulated intergroup contact model and the Common Ingroup Identity Model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.194
CR  - Filippou, G. (2012). Secondary Transfer Effect of Contact: A Study among Greek Cypriot University Students. The Cyprus Research Facts, 3.
CR  - Flores, A. R. (2015). Attitudes toward transgender rights: Perceived knowledge and secondary interpersonal contact. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(3), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2015.1050414
CR  - Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., Rust, M. C., Gaertner, S. L., … Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
CR  - Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.5465/255979
CR  - Green, E. G. T., Visintin, E. P., Sarrasin, O., & Hewstone, M. (2020). When integration policies shape the impact of intergroup contact on threat perceptions: a multilevel study across 20 European countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550159
CR  - Harwood, J., Paolini, S., Joyce, N., Rubin, M., & Arroyo, A. (2011). Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X524263
CR  - Hässler, T., Uluğ, Ö. M., Kappmeier, M., & Travaglino, G. A. (2021). Intergroup contact and social change: An integrated Contact-Collective Action Model. Journal of Social Issues, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12412
CR  - Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1601785
CR  - Hewstone, M. (2015). Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71(2), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12120
CR  - Hindriks, P., Verkuyten, M., & Coenders, M. (2014). Interminority attitudes: The roles of ethnic and national identification, contact, and multiculturalism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513511469
CR  - Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out- group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196005
CR  - Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Vezzali, L., Ranta, M., Pacilli, M. G., Giacomantonio, M., & Pagliaro, S. (2020). Conditional secondary transfer effect: The moderating role of moral credentials and prejudice. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220940401
CR  - Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2014). Improving Intergroup Attitudes through Televised Vicarious Intergroup Contact: Social Cognitive Processing of Ingroup and Outgroup Information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944
CR  - Kamans, E., Otten, S., & Gordijn, E. H. (2011). Power and threat in intergroup conflict : How emotional and behavioral responses depend on amount and content of threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210372525
CR  - Lemmer, G., & Wagner, U. (2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2079
CR  - Lissitsa, S., & Kushnirovich, N. (2018). Secondary transfer effect of positive and negative online contact between groups involved in high-intensity conflict. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 67, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.10.001
CR  - Lolliot, S., Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Al Ramiah, A., Tausch, N., & Swart, H. (2013). Generalised effects of intergroup contact: The secondary transfer effect. In G. Hodson & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Advances in Intergroup Contact (pp. 81–112). East Sussex: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095461
CR  - Mähönen, T. A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2016). Ramifications of positive and negative contact experiences among remigrants from Russia to Finland. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(2), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000059
CR  - Marrow, H. B., Tropp, L. R., Van Der Linden, M., Okamoto, D. G., & Jones-Correa, M. (2019). How does interracial contact among the U.S.-born shape white and black receptivity toward immigrants? Du Bois Review, 16(2), 385–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X19000249
CR  - McKeown, S., & Dixon, J. (2017). The “contact hypothesis”: Critical reflections and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12295
CR  - Meleady, R., & Forder, L. (2019). When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 688–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218761568
CR  - Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
CR  - Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185.
CR  - Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
CR  - Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to noncontacted outgroups? Social Psychology, 40(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55
CR  - Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
CR  - Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology Eur., 38(2008), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp
CR  - Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
CR  - Ployhart, R. E., & MacKenzie Jr., W. I. (2015). Two waves of measurement do not a longitudinal study make. In More statistical and methodological myths and urban legends. (pp. 85–99). New York,  NY,  US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
CR  - Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social Identity Complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01
CR  - Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Küpper, B., Zick, A., & Wagner, U. (2012). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: A cross-national comparison in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511430235
CR  - Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., & Tausch, N. (2014). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact via social identity complexity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(3), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12045
CR  - Schulz, M., & Taylor, L. K. (2018). The processes underlying the quality of contact with the primary out-group and in-group importance on support for the Syrian resettlement in a post-accord context. Peace and Conflict, 24(3), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000321
CR  - Shook, N. J., Hopkins, P. D., & Koech, J. M. (2016). The effect of intergroup contact on secondary group attitudes and social dominance orientation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(3), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215572266
CR  - Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CR  - Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031002006
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, 23–46.
CR  - Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Psaltis, C., Schmid, K., Popan, J. R., … Hughes, J. (2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018553
CR  - Tee, N., & Hegarty, P. (2006). Predicting opposition to the civil rights of trans persons in the United Kingdom. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.851
CR  - Turner, R. N., & Feddes, A. R. (2011). How intergroup friendship works: A longitudinal study of friendship effects on outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(7), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.843
CR  - Ünver, H., Çakal, H., Güler, M., & Tropp, L. R. (2021). Support for rights of Syrian refugees in Turkey: The role of secondary transfer effects in intergroup contact. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2562
CR  - Van Laar, C., Levin, S., Sinclair, S., & Sidanius, J. (2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.002
CR  - Vezzali, L., Di Bernardo, G. A., Birtel, M. D., Stathi, S., & Brambilla, M. (2019). Outgroup morality perceptions mediate secondary transfer effects from direct and extended contact: Evidence from majority and minority group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219879223
CR  - Vezzali, L., Di Bernardo, G. A., Cocco, V. M., Stathi, S., & Capozza, D. (2021). Reducing prejudice in the society at large: A review of the secondary transfer effect and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12583
CR  - Vezzali, L., Di Bernardo, G. A., Stathi, S., Cadamuro, A., Lášticová, B., & Andraščiková, S. (2018). Secondary transfer effect among children: The role of social dominance orientation and outgroup attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12248
CR  - Vezzali, L., & Giovannini, D. (2011). Cross-Group Friendships, Social Dominance Orientation and Secondary Transfer Effect. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18(3), 181–194.
CR  - Vezzali, L., & Giovannini, D. (2012). Secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact: The role of intergroup attitudes, intergroup anxiety and perspective taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp
CR  - Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wölfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
CR  - Visintin, E. P., Birtel, M. D., & Crisp, R. J. (2017). The role of multicultural and colorblind ideologies and typicality in imagined contact interventions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 59, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.04.010
CR  - Žeželj, I. L., Ioannou, M., Franc, R., Psaltis, C., & Martinovic, B. (2017). The role of inter-ethnic online friendships in prejudice reduction in post-conflict societies: Evidence from Serbia, Croatia and Cyprus. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.041
CR  - Zezelj, I., Milošević-Đorđević, J., Van Niekerk, J., & Pavlović, Z. (2020). How to address the caveat of avoiding direct contact: Reducing prejudice towards gay and lesbian people in five Balkan countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 160(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1611531
CR  - Zingora, T., & Graf, S. (2019). Marry who you love: Intergroup contact with gay people and another stigmatized minority is related to voting on the restriction of gay rights through threat. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(11), 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12627
UR  - https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1081427
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2284133
ER  -