@article{article_1086013, title={Mutezile’nin Felsefe Eleştirisi: Harezmli Mutezilî İbnü’l-Melâhimî’nin Felsefeye Reddiyesi [Muʿtazila’s Critique of Philosophy: Muʿtazilī Theologian Ibn al-Malāḥimī of Khwārazm’s Refutation of Philosophy], by Orhan Şener Koloğlu}, journal={Ilahiyat Studies}, volume={1}, pages={264–266}, year={2011}, DOI={10.12730/13091719.2010.12.18}, author={Kaya, Cüneyt}, keywords={Mutezile, Muʿtazila, Ibn al-Malāḥimī, Khwārazm, Philosophy}, abstract={<div style="text-align:justify;">First paragraph:
Although the relationship between kalām and philosophy (or be-tween religion and philosophy) remains one of the most popular subjects in Islamic studies, much of the discussion appears to be con-fined exclusively to al-Ghazālī’s refutation and Ibn Rushd’s defense of philosophy in Tahāfut al-falāsifa and Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, respectively. Needless to say, this discussion should be enriched by introducing new figures, works, and centuries. Ibn al-Malāḥimī’s (d. 536/1141) Tuḥfat al-mutakallimīn fī l-radd ʿalā l-falāsifa (Gift for the Theologians in Refutation of the Philosophers), edited by Hassan Ansari and Wilferd Madelung in 2008 (Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy & Institute of Islamic Studies Free University of Berlin) can be seen as an important contribution to this enrichment. What makes Ibn al-Malāḥimī particularly significant is his affiliation to the Muʿtazila as a member of the school of al-Ḥusayniyya, founded by Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī, in Khwārazm. For, although the critique of philosophy done by Sunnī and salafī theologians is relatively well known in the litera-ture, we still lack adequate detailed examination of the Muʿtazilī theologians’ approach to philosophy. </div>}, number={2}, publisher={Bursa İlahiyat Vakfı}