TY  - JOUR
T1  - CALCULATION OF HEALTH SYSTEM SUCCESS INDEX OF COUNTRIES ACCORDING TO MORTALITY, HEALTH EXPENDITURE AND HEALTHY LIFE EXPECTANCY
AU  - Boz, Canser
AU  - Özsarı, Salih Haluk
PY  - 2022
DA  - November
Y2  - 2022
DO  - 10.31201/ijhmt.1172805
JF  - International Journal of Health Management and Tourism
PB  - Dilaver TENGİLİMOĞLU
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2458-9608
SP  - 305
EP  - 316
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
LA  - en
AB  - Aim: The aim of this study is to measure the health system success of G10 countries according to the dimensions of death, expenditure and healthy life expectancy by creating an index and comparing it multidimensional for both 2005, 2015 and 2020.Methods: In the study, the "health system success index" consisting of three dimensions and four indicators was created. Dimensions were determined as quality of life, spending success-financial success- and death- mortality. While calculating the success index, indicators were used for each dimension and “quality of life index” for quality of life, “spending success index” for spending success and “living index” for death were formed. A general health system success index was obtained by taking the geometric average of the three indices created with the help of dimensionsResults: According to the 2005 health system success index, Japan was the most successful country among the G10 countries, while the USA was found to be the country with the lowest success index. Conclusion: The country with the highest success index in 2020 was again Japan, while the Netherlands ranked 2nd as the country that made the most progress in this process. Similar to 2005, the USA was found to be the country that was relatively unsuccessful in 2020.
KW  - Health System
KW  - Catastrophic Spending
KW  - G10
KW  - Quality of Life
KW  - Mortality
CR  - Afonso A. and Aubyn M. (2006). Relative Efficiency of Health Provision: a DEA Approach with Non-discretionary Inputs,
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=952629
CR  - Cherchye, L. (2001). Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Assess Macroeconomic Policy Performance, Applied Economics, 33, 407-416.
CR  - Daşdan, İ. ve Çetinkaya, V. (2015). OECD Ülkeleri ve Türkiye’nin Sağlık Sistemleri, Sağlık Harcamaları ve Sağlık Göstergeleri Karşılaştırması. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi (SGD), 5(1), 104-134.
CR  - Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP) (2009). Composıte Measures/Indices of Health And Health System Performance. Retrieved 01 September 2022 http://mchpappserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/deliverablesList.html
CR  - Nardo M., Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Hoffman A. ve Giovannini E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide, OECD Statistics Working Paper, Paris.
CR  - OECD (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment, DSTI/DOC(2003)16, Paris.
CR  - OECD (2008). Health System Reviews: Turkey. OECD and World Bank Publications.
CR  - Saisana M. and Tarantola S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. EUR 20408 EN Report, European Commission, JRC, Ispra, Italy.
CR  - WHO (2000). Overall Health System attainment for 191 countries. WHO Publications.
CR  - Xu, K., Evans, D., Carrin, G., Aguilar-Rivera, A., Musgrove, P., ve Evans, T. (2007). Protecting households from catastrophic health spending. Health Aff (Millwood), 26(4), 972-983.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31201/ijhmt.1172805
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2783543
ER  -