TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Role of Collaborations in Successful R&D Projects
AU  - Altuğ, Sema Nur
AU  - Ekici, Oya
PY  - 2023
DA  - December
DO  - 10.26650/ibr.2023.52.1214815
JF  - Istanbul Business Research
JO  - IBR
PB  - Istanbul University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2630-5488
SP  - 521
EP  - 542
VL  - 52
IS  - 3
LA  - en
AB  - R&D and innovation studies often involve complex and highly uncertain tasks, which require experts to work together. This paper aims to investigate how collaboration affects the probability of success for an R&D (Research and Development) project while controlling some other factors or groups. Retrospective data of the projects managed in an R&D Centre of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) are used in the study. A generalized linear model, logit, and mixed-effect logistic regression in order to examine random effects, are implemented for the empirical analyses. In our findings, exceeding the project deadline appeared as a predictor of success in the R&D project, and collaborations’ effects on R&D project success are dependent on the type of these projects. It is useful to decide on the number of collaborating institutions, depending on the project type, type of funding, and the aim of the R&D projects. Product development projects aiming at digital government or homeland security will increase their probability of success via collaboration. R&D projects with limited funds, probably have concerns about the extra costs, but as odds ratios increase against expectations, we can conclude that these projects may also benefit from collaboration.
KW  - R&D Projects
KW  - Collaboration
KW  - Success Factors
KW  - Automated Model Selection
CR  - Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical Data Analysis (3rd Ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
CR  - Anderson, D. R. (2008). Model Based Inferences in the Life Sciences: a Primer on Evidence. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer. google scholar
CR  - Aschhoff, B., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical evidence on the success of R&D cooperation: Happy toget-her?. Review of Industrial Organization, 33, 41-62. google scholar
CR  - Baaken, T., Kesting, T., & Gerstlberger, W. (2017). A benefit segmentation approach for innovation-oriented university-business collaboration. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(1/2), 58. https:// doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2018.10009594 google scholar
CR  - Baker, B. N., Murphy, D. C., & Fisher, D. (1983). Factors affecting project success, Project Management Handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York (cited from Belassi & Tükel, 1996). google scholar
CR  - Balachandra R., & Friar J.H. (1997). Factors for Success in R&D Projects and New Product Innovation: A Contextual Framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44, 276-287. google scholar
CR  - Baniak, A., & Dubina, I. (2012). Innovation analysis and game theory: A review. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 14(2), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.178 google scholar
CR  - Bayona, C., Garaa-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: An empi-rical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30(8), 1289-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00151-7 google scholar
CR  - Belassi, W., & Tukel, O. I. (1996). A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in pro-jects. International Journal ofProject Management, 14(3), 141-151. google scholar
CR  - Belderbos, R., Carree M., & Lokshin B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33, 1477-92. google scholar
CR  - Binenbaum, E. (2008). Incentive issues in R&D consortia: Insights from applied game theory. Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(4), 636-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00097. google scholar
CR  - Bizan O. (2003). The determinants of success of R&D projects: evidence from American-Israeli research alliances. Research Policy, 32, 1619-1640. google scholar
CR  - Bond-Barnard, T. J., Fletcher, L., & Steyn, H. (2018). Linking trust and collaboration in project teams to project management success. International Journal ofManaging Projects in Business, 11(2), 432-457. google scholar
CR  - Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel Inference. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261-304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644. google scholar
CR  - Carayannis, E. E. G., & Alexander, J. (1999). Winning by co-opeting in strategic government-university-in-dustry R&D partnerships: the power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. The Journal of Techno-logy Transfer, 24(2-3), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007855422405 google scholar
CR  - Carayannis, E. G. C., & Alexander, J. (2004). Strategy, structure, and performance issues of precompetitive R&D consortia: insights and lessons learned from SEMATECH. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(2):226-32. doi:10.1109/tem.2003.822459 google scholar
CR  - Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M. C., & Valentini, G. (2009). Organising R&D projects to profit from inno-vation: insights from co-opetition. Long Range Planning, 42(2), 216-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lrp.2009.01.001 google scholar
CR  - Cooper R. G., & Kleinschmidt E. J. (1997). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal ofProduct Innovation Management, 12, 374-391. google scholar
CR  - Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31-60. google scholar
CR  - Diirr, B., & Cappelli, C. (2018). A systematic literature review to understand cross-organizational relations-hip management and collaboration. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.020 google scholar
CR  - Dwyer L., & Mellor R. (1991). New Product Process Activities and Project Outcomes. R&D Management, 21, 31-42. google scholar
CR  - Etzkowitz H., & Leydesdorff L. (1995). The triple helix - university-industry-government relations: a labora-tory for knowledge based economic development. EASST European Association for the Study of Science and Technology Review, 14 (1), 14-19. google scholar
CR  - Fernandes, G., Araûjo, M., Andrade, R., Pinto, E. B., Tereso, A., & Machado, R. J. (2020). Critical factors for benefits realisation in collaborative university-industry R&D programs. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 12 (1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpom.2020.105712 google scholar
CR  - Fritsch, M. & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D?. Research Policy, 30, 297-312. google scholar
CR  - Gaynor G.H. (1996). Monitoring projects - it’s more than reading reports. Research Technology Manage-ment, March-April, 45-47. google scholar
CR  - Gong, L., & Zhang, X. (2014). Study of the game theory analysis and incentive mechanism of inter-organi-zational knowledge sharing in cooperative R&D. IERI Procedia, 10, 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ieri.2014.09.087 google scholar
CR  - Griffin A., & Page A.L. (1993). An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management., 10, 291-308. google scholar
CR  - Gulati R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619-652. google scholar
CR  - Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganisational modes of co-operation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371-85. google scholar
CR  - Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alli-ances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103. google scholar
CR  - Hauser, J. R. (1998). Research, development and engineering metrics. Management Science, 44, 1670-1689. google scholar
CR  - Katz, M. (1986). An analysis of cooperative research and development. Rand Journal of Economics, Winter, 17, 527-43. google scholar
CR  - Kang, K. H., & Kang, J. (2010). Does partner type matter in R&D collaboration for product innovation?. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(8), 945-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.201 0.520473 google scholar
CR  - Kerssens-van Drongelen, I. C., & Bilderbeek, J. (1999). R&D performance measurement: more than choo-sing a set of metrics. R&D Management, 29(1), 35-46. google scholar
CR  - Kleinknecht, A. & Reijnen, J. O. N. (1992). Why Do Firms Cooperate on Research-and-Development - an Empirical-Study. Research Policy, 21(4), 347-360. google scholar
CR  - Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studi-es of Science, 35(5), 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359 google scholar
CR  - Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.002 google scholar
CR  - Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Garrett, R. P. (2012). Governance in multilateral R & D allian-ces. Organization Science, 23(4), 1191-1210. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0671 google scholar
CR  - Maidique M. A., & Zirger B.J. (1985). The New Product Learning Cycle. Research Policy, 14, 299-313. google scholar
CR  - Mishra, A., Chandrasekaran, A., & Maccormack, A. (2015). Collaboration in Multi-Partner R&D Projects: The Impact of Partnering Scale and Scope. Journal of OperationsManagement, 33-34, 1-14. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.008 google scholar
CR  - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guide-lines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris. google scholar
CR  - Okamuro H. (2007). Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics. Research Policy, 36, 1529-1544. google scholar
CR  - Pinto J. K., & Slevin D. P. (1987). Critical Factors in Successful Project Implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-34, 22-27. google scholar
CR  - Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quar-terly, 35, 153-76. google scholar
CR  - Simao, L., & Franco M. (2015). The Effect of R&D Cooperation on Organizational Innovation: An Empirical Study of Portuguese Enterprises. In Farinha, L.M.C., Ferreira, J.J.M., Smith, H.L., Bagchi-Sen, S. (Eds) Handbook ofResearch on Global Competitive Advantage through Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Ch. 21, pp. 352-370), Spain, IGI Global ABSCA Book Series. google scholar
CR  - Smith-Doerr, L., Manev, I. M., & Rizova, P. (2004). The meaning of success: Network position and the social construction of project outcomes in an R&D lab. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 21(1-2), 51-81. google scholar
CR  - Souder W. E., & Jenssen S.A. (1999). Management Practices Influencing New Product Success and Failure In The United States And Scandinavia: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study. Journal ofProduct Innova-tion Management, 16, 183-203. google scholar
CR  - Teng, B. S. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource-based app-roach toward competitive advantage. Journal ofManagement Studies, 44, 119-42. google scholar
CR  - Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947-67. google scholar
CR  - Thamhain, H. J. (2003). Managing innovative R & D teams. R&D Management, 33(3), 297-311. google scholar
UR  - https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2023.52.1214815
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2813698
ER  -