TY - JOUR T1 - Examination of the Relationship Between the Reaction Time, Competition Result With the Competition Hour in the World Indoor Championships (2006-2022): 60 Meters AU - Bayrakdar, Akan AU - Satılmış, Nuray AU - Taşdemir, Bülent AU - Bayraktar, Işık PY - 2023 DA - August Y2 - 2023 DO - 10.15314/tsed.1292928 JF - Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise JO - Turk J Sport Exe PB - Selcuk University WT - DergiPark SN - 2147-5652 SP - 248 EP - 254 VL - 25 IS - 2 LA - en AB - The relationship between the reaction time and the total running time of male (n=407) and female (n=345) athletes competing in the 60-meter wind sprint branch at the world indoor championships between 2006 and 2022 and the competition hour was examined in this study. Statistically significant and negative relationships were found between competition hour and athletes' reaction times, competition hour and athletes' competition result ratings in both genders (rho<0.040; p<0.05). When the subject is examined in terms of the stages of the competitions, no relationship was found for both genders in the final stage while the same relationships were preserved in the semi-final stage. At the qualification stage, a positive relationship was observed between the competition hour and the reaction time in both men (rho=0.25) and women (rho=0.22). In particular, it will be important that the competition time zones in the qualification stage are in similar circadian zones so as not to create a disadvantage among the athletes, and that the competition programs should be prepared by taking the performance-limiting and performance-supporting time zones into account. KW - Athletics KW - Sprint KW - Circadian KW - Reaction Time CR - 1. Aslan, K., Gelen, N. K., Saygın, Ö., & Aslan, H. G. (2021). Gün zamanının raket sporcularında algısal-bilişsel özellikler üzerine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(2). 2. Atkinson, G., Coldwells, A., Reilly, T., & Waterhouse, J. (1993). A comparison of circadian rhythms in work performance between physically active and inactive subjects. Ergonomics, 36(1–3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967882 UR - https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.1292928 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3124352 ER -