TY  - JOUR
T1  - EVALUATION OF THE CHATGPT-4 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEMS OF HIP REPLACEMENT CHAT GPT-4 Yapay Zekanın Kalça Protezi Sorunlarına Cevabının Değerlendirilmesi
AU  - Olçar, Hacı Ali
AU  - Aydın Akbuğa, Gökçen
AU  - Ulutürk, Samet
AU  - Aras Doğan, Şenay
AU  - Korkmaz, Murat
AU  - Korkmaz, İrem Nisa
PY  - 2023
DA  - December
Y2  - 2023
DO  - 10.16919/bozoktip.1318421
JF  - Bozok Tıp Dergisi
PB  - Yozgat Bozok University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2146-4006
SP  - 118
EP  - 122
VL  - 13
IS  - 4
LA  - tr
AB  - Objective: This study aims to evaluate the CHAT GPT-4 artificial intelligence responses to common problemsexperienced by patients after hip replacement surgery using expert opinion.Material and Methods: The study used an 11-question form developed by the researcher from a literaturereview of the information needs of patients after hip replacement surgery. Ten orthopaedic specialists ratedthe accuracy of the responses generated by Chat GPT-4 using a 5-point Likert scale (5: strongly agree, 1:strongly disagree).The maximum score that can be obtained from the rating scale is 55, and the minimumscore is 11. The scores are summarised using descriptive statistics.Results: All of the experts agreed that the artificial intelligence (AI) correctly answered the signs of woundinfection (4.80±0.42), practices to prevent home accidents (4.50±0.52), and in which cases a doctor shouldbe consulted (4.50±0.52). Half of the experts report that the artificial intelligence answered the question(Antithrombotic treatment time) portially true/false. For the question (Will my hip replacement dislocate?)60 % of the experts report that the artificial intelligence answered partially true/false.Conclusion: When Chat GPT-4 was evaluated by experts, it was found to provide mostly accurate information.However, it is thought that it may be more limited in individualised treatment and care practices. Moreresearch is needed to confirm the accuracy of the results.
KW  - EVALUATION OF THE CHATGPT-4 ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEMS OF HIP
REPLACEMENT
KW  - CHAT GPT-4 Yapay Zekanın Kalça Protezi Sorunlarına Cevabının
KW  - Değerlendirilmesi
CR  - 1. Teubner, T., Flath, C. M., Weinhardt, C., van der Aalst, W., & Hinz, O. (2023). Welcome to the era of chatgpt et al. the prospects of large language models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65(2), 95-101.
CR  - 2. Birer, G. C., “ChatGPT”, TÜBİTAK Bilim ve Teknik Dergisi, 2023;662:36-7
CR  - 3. Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting andcheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-12.
CR  - 4. Daniel, G., Cabot, J., Deruelle, L., & Derras, M. Xatkit: a multimodal low-code chatbot development framework. IEEE Access, 8, 15332-46.
CR  - 5. OECD. Hip and knee replacement. In Health Care Activities Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015; 112-3.
CR  - 6. Balkan A, Seki Z. Determination of Complications of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement after Discharge. BSJ Health Sci, 2021; 4(2): 141-9.
CR  - 7. Lucas B. Total hip and total knee replacement: postoperative nursing management. Br J Nurs. 2008 Dec 11-2009 Jan 7;17(22):1410-4
CR  - 8. Yıldırım A, Şendir M. Postoperative Pain Assessment and Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement. University of Health Sciences Journal of Nursing. 2013; 1(3): 157-64.
CR  - 9. Montin, L., Suominen, T., & Leino-Kilpi, H. The experiences of patients undergoing total hip replacement. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 2002;6(1):23-9.
CR  - 10. Kaya, Ç., & Bilik, Ö. Effect of Counseling on Quality of Life and Self-Care Agency for Patients Who are Scheduled for Total Knee Replacement. Clinical Nursing Research, 2022;31(3):519-29.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.1318421
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3601214
ER  -