TY - JOUR T1 - Current Approaches for the Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence - A Guideline of Guidelines TT - Current Approaches for the Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence - A Guideline of Guidelines AU - Kaynar, Bedriye Müge AU - Kalkan, Senad PY - 2024 DA - February JF - The New Journal of Urology JO - New J Urol PB - Ali İhsan TAŞÇI WT - DergiPark SN - 3023-6940 SP - 42 EP - 51 VL - 19 IS - 1 LA - en AB - Urologists utilize evidence-based guidelines organized by urological organizations in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The objective of this study is to provide guidance in the clinical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by reviewing key guidelines. We conducted a medical literature analysis in the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Cochrane Library. We also manually searched the websites of the following international and national societies to identify relevant guidelines for inclusion in this review: the International Consultation on Incontinence, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Urogynecologic Society, American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamic, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Association of Urology, and Canadian Urological Association. The recommendations in the guidelines are summarized in different areas, including the diagnostic standards of SUI, examination and evaluation methods, and conservative treatment methods. This ‘guideline of guidelines’ presents the similarities and differences between prominent authorities in the management of SUI. KW - Guidelines KW - lower urinary tract symptoms KW - pressure-flow study KW - stress urinary incontinence N2 - Urologists utilize evidence-based guidelines organized by urological organizations in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The objective of this study is to provide guidance in the clinical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by reviewing key guidelines. We conducted a medical literature analysis in the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Cochrane Library. We also manually searched the websites of the following international and national societies to identify relevant guidelines for inclusion in this review: the International Consultation on Incontinence, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Urogynecologic Society, American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamic, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Association of Urology, and Canadian Urological Association. The recommendations in the guidelines are summarized in different areas, including the diagnostic standards of SUI, examination and evaluation methods, and conservative treatment methods. This ‘guideline of guidelines’ presents the similarities and differences between prominent authorities in the management of SUI. CR - 1. Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Reviews in urology. 2004;6(Suppl 3):S3. CR - 2. Yang X, Zhang A, Tan Y, Zhang Z, Zhang J. Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of stress urinary incontinence using AGREE II instrument: a systematic review protocol. BMJ open. 2019;9(9):e030299. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030299 CR - 3. Society AU, Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. Committee Opinion: Evaluation of Uncomplicated Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women Before Surgical Treatment. Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery. 2014;20(5):248-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000113 CR - 4. Legendre G, Fritel X, Panjo H, Zins M, Ringa V. Incidence and remission of stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence in midlife and older women: a longitudinal cohort study. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2020;39(2):650-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24237 CR - 5. Kenton KS, Smilen SW. Urinary Incontinence in Women. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery. 2015;21(6):304-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000231 CR - 6. Kalejaiye O, Vij M, Drake MJ. Classification of stress urinary incontinence. World journal of urology. 2015;33(9):1215-20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1617-1 CR - 7. Kopańska M, Torices S, Czech J, Koziara W, Toborek M, Dobrek Ł. Urinary incontinence in women: biofeedback as an innovative treatment method. Therapeutic Advances in Urology. 2020;12:1756287220934359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287220934359. CR - 8. Sussman RD, Syan R, Brucker BM. Guideline of guidelines: urinary incontinence in women. BJU international. 2020;125(5):638-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14927 CR - 9. Shekelle PG. Clinical practice guidelines: what’s next? Jama. 2018;320(8):757-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.9660 CR - 10. Abrams P, Andersson K-E, Apostolidis A, Birder L, Bliss D, Brubaker L, et al. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2018;37(7):2271-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23551 CR - 11. Bulletins—Gynecology CoP, Society tAU. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 155: urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e66-81.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001148 CR - 12. Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, Ginsberg DA, Goldman HB, Gomelsky A, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. The Journal of urology. 2017;198(4):875-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.061 CR - 13. Lightner DJ, Gomelsky A, Souter L, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment 2019. The Journal of urology. 2019;202(3):558-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000309 CR - 14. Guidance N. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management:© NICE (2019) Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: Management. BJU Int. 2019;123(5):777-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14763 CR - 15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Bmj. 2008;336(7650):924-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD CR - 16. Bettez M, Le Mai Tu KC, Corcos J, Gajewski J, Jolivet M, Bailly G. 2012 update: guidelines for adult urinary incontinence collaborative consensus document for the Canadian Urological Association. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2012;6(5):354. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.12248 CR - 17. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Bensalah K, Bex A, Giles R, Hora M. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. Eur Urol. 2020;67(5):913-24. CR - 18. D’Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, Abranches‐Monteiro L, Arnold E, Goldman H, et al. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2019;38(2):433-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23897 CR - 19. Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. Evaluation of uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women before surgical treatment. Committee Opinion No. 603. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1403-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000450759.34453.31 CR - 20. Holroyd-Leduc JM, Tannenbaum C, Thorpe KE, Straus SE. What type of urinary incontinence does this woman have? Jama. 2008;299(12):1446-56. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.12.1446 CR - 21. Martin J, Williams K, Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Assassa R. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of methods of diagnostic assessment for urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics: Official Journal of the International Continence Society. 2006;25(7):674-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20340 CR - 22. Bandukwala NQ, Gousse AE. Mixed urinary incontinence: what first? Current urology reports. 2015;16(3):9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0483-0 CR - 23. Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366(21):1987-97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113595 CR - 24. Robinson BL, Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Crane AK, Jannelli ML, Wells EC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of visual urethral mobility exam versus Q-Tip test: a randomized crossover trial. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;206(6):528. e1-. e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.015. CR - 25. Rosier PF, Schaefer W, Lose G, Goldman HB, Guralnick M, Eustice S, et al. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure‐flow study. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2017;36(5):1243-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23124 CR - 26. Drake MJ, Doumouchtsis SK, Hashim H, Gammie A. Fundamentals of urodynamic practice, based on International Continence Society good urodynamic practices recommendations. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2018;37(S6):S50-S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23777 CR - 27. Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay‐Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub2. CR - 28. Kotecha P, Sahai A, Malde S. Use of duloxetine for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. European Urology Focus. 2021;7(3):618-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.007 UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/newurology/issue//1490237 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3957339 ER -