@article{article_1559, title={CASE C-371/08, NURAL ZIEBELL v. LAND BADENWÜRTTEMBERG}, journal={Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi}, volume={20}, pages={165–175}, year={2012}, DOI={10.29228/mjes.124}, author={Neuwahl, Nanette}, keywords={CASE, NURAL, ZIEBELL}, abstract={<p>This case is about the scope of certain provisions of EU law: is the so-called ‘citizens’ directive’ (replacing the EU worker’s directive) applicable by analogy to a Turkish worker resident in Germany if the long-term resident directive is not applied? In reply, the Court acts as a doctor who cuts out a sore without spending much time on explaining the diagnosis. Its answer comes down to saying that for Turkish workers the citizens’ directive does not entail any rights that extend beyond those already applicable under the EU-Turkey Association Council Decisions and associated case law. As a result, in the case at hand, the EU restriction of the reasons for the expulsion of foreign nationals to public security did not apply as a matter of EU law to Turkish workers. No analogy was drawn to the situation of workers of the European Economic Area in this case.  <br /> </p>}, number={2}, publisher={Marmara University}