TY - JOUR T1 - Predicting smoking cessation success: a machine learning approach using the global adult tobacco survey AU - Alnoukati, Mouhib AU - Albaghdadi, Enas AU - Shebli, Lujain PY - 2025 DA - August Y2 - 2025 DO - 10.20518/tjph.1565381 JF - Turkish Journal of Public Health JO - TJPH PB - Halk Sağlığı Uzmanları Derneği WT - DergiPark SN - 1304-1088 SP - 144 EP - 162 VL - 23 IS - 2 LA - en AB - Objective: This paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithmsin predicting smoking cessation outcomes using Global adult tobacco surveys (GATS) data.Specifically, we investigated the influence of sociodemographic, behavioral, and environmentalfactors on smoking cessation success.Method: GATS data from multiple countries were analyzed using various ML models, including:K-nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forests, neural networks, Naive Bayes and logisticregression. These models were utilized to classify smoking behaviors and predict smoking cessationoutcomes.Results: Logistic regression exhibited the highest accuracy (69.8%) in predicting smoking cessation,surpassing other ML models and emphasizing the impact of sociodemographic, behavioral, andenvironmental factors on cessation. Additionally, the study highlights the role of education,employment, and the family environment in shaping smoking behaviors and cessation outcomes.Conclusion: This research underscores the potential of ML to inform effective smoking cessationstrategies. By identifying influential factors and predicting cessation outcomes, policymakers cantailor interventions to specific populations and enhance their effectiveness. KW - Smoking cessation KW - Machine learning KW - Predictive models KW - Data analysis KW - Global adult tobacco survey CR - 1. Warren KB, Devin CT, William HC, al. Predictors of smoking cessation outcomes identified by machine learning:A systematic review. Addict Neurosci 2023;6:100068. 2. Lai CC, Huang WH, Chang BC, Hwang LC. Development of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Smoking Cessation Outcome. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(5):2584. CR - 3. Rijhwani K, Mohanty VR, Aswini YB, Singh V, Hashmi S. Applicability of Data Mining and Predictive Analysis for Tobacco Cessation: An Exploratory Study. Front Dent 2020;17:24. CR - 4. Thangaraju P, Barkavi G, Karthikeyan T. Mining Lung Cancer Data for Smokers and Non-Smokers by Using Data Mining Techniques. IJARCCE. 2014;3(7):7622-7626. CR - 5. Kharabsheh M, Qawasmeh A, Megdadi O, Jawabreh N, Mudallal R, Alzyoud S. A Critical Analysis of the Relationship between Depression and Smoking using Machine Learning. IJSTR 2019;8(12):22-26. CR - 6. Roy P, Hossain MF, Jahan N. Machine Learning Approach to Predict Influence of Smoking on Student Life. ICCCNT Proc. 2021;1-6. CR - 7. Ismail RM. Using machine learning algorithms to study the smoking behavior of Iraqi students. Eurasian Research Bulletin 2023;16:91-101. CR - 8. Choi J, Jung H.T, Ferrell A, Woo S, Haddad L. Machine Learning-Based Nicotine Addiction Prediction Models for Youth E-Cigarette and Waterpipe (Hookah) Users. J Clin Med 2021;10(5):972. CR - 9. Kharabsheh M, Meqdadi O, Alabed M, Veeranki S, Abbadi A, Alzyoud S. A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Nicotine Dependence. IJACSA 2019;10(3):179-184. CR - 10. Davagdorj K, Yu SH, Kim SY, et al. Prediction of 6 Months Smoking Cessation Program among Women in Korea. Int J of Machine Learning and Computing 2019;9(1):83-90. CR - 11. Thakur SS, Poddar P, Roy RB. Real-time prediction of smoking activity using machine learning based multi-class classification model. Multimed Tools Appl 2022;81(10):14529-14551. CR - 12. Durmuşoğlu UZD, Çiftçi KP. Socio-demographic determinants of smoking: A data mining analysis of the Global Adult Tobacco Surveys. Turk J Public Health 2021;19(3):251-262. CR - 13. Davagdorj K, Park KH, Lee JS, Ryu KH. A machine-learning approach for predicting success in smoking cessation intervention. IEEE 2019. CR - 14. Issabakhsh M, Sanchez-Romero LM, Le TTT, et al. Machine learning application for predicting smoking cessation among US adults: An analysis of waves 1-3 of the PATH study. PLoS ONE 2023;18(6):e0286883. CR - 15. Siddiqui MA, Khan AS, Witjaksono G. Classification of the factors for smoking cessation using logistic regression, decision tree & neural networks. AIP Conf Proc 2020;2203:020036020036-72. CR - 16. Durmuşoğlu ZDU, Kocabey Çiftçi P. Classification of Smoking Status: The Case of Turkey. Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence 2016;1-5. 17. Poynton MR, McDaniel AM. Classification of smoking cessation status with a backpropagation neural network. J Biomed Inform 2006;39(6):680-686. CR - 18. Wanga X, Zhao K, Cha S, et al. Mining user-generated content in an online smoking cessation community to identify smoking status: A machine learning approach. Decis Support Syst. 2019;116:26-34. CR - 19. Martinović T. Investigating Tobacco Usage Habits using Data Mining Approach. Entrenova 2015;1-10. CR - 20. Perski O, Li K, Pontikos N, Simons D, et al. Classification of Lapses in Smokers Attempting to Stop: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach using Data from a Popular Smoking Cessation Smartphone App. Nicotine Tob Res 2023;25(7):1330-1339. CR - 21. Al-ssabbagh M, Elango V, Winkler V. What makes people quit tobacco and succeed at it? An exploratory analysis of smoked and smokeless tobacco from India. Prev Med 2022;158:107033. UR - https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.1565381 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4280492 ER -