TY  - JOUR
T1  - القبيلة والطريقة الصوفية (تطابق البنى واختلافها)
TT  - The Tribe and the Sufi Orders:  Structural Resemblances and Distinctions
AU  - Kaplan, Muhammed Nur
AU  - Alshamam, Ahmad
PY  - 2025
DA  - April
Y2  - 2025
DO  - 10.32950/rid.1586667
JF  - Rize İlahiyat Dergisi
PB  - Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2980-0331
SP  - 329
EP  - 341
IS  - 28
LA  - ar
AB  - يعالج هذا البحث نقاط التشابه والاختلاف بين البنية القبلية والطريقة الصوفية في البعدين النظري والعملي، فيركز في قسمه الأول على هيكلية البنية وجوهرها في الوعي القبلي والطرقي من خلال تحليل تصورهما لمفهوم السلالة وشجرة النسب، ثم حضور مفهوم البيعة والطاعة، ثم التعريج على التسمية والنسبة للزعيم في كلا البنيتين، والكشف أخيراً عن طبيعة التراتبية الهرمية فيهما. يركز البحث في قسمه الثاني على الأدوات والآليات التي تعتمد عليها كل من القبيلة والطريقة للنهوض بأدوارهما الاعتقادية والثقافية والاجتماعية؛ كالسرد البطولي، والمضافة والزاوية.. وغيرهما، وأثر ذلك كله في صياغة الهوية والذاكرة والمخيال الجمعي. أما القسم الثالث من البحث فقد اختص بفاعلية البنية (القبلية والطرقية) وطبيعة منزعها وأشكال حركتها، وذلك بالتركيز أولاً على نزعة التوسع والانتشار، وعلى طبيعة الهجرة والاحتواء، في بنية كل من القبيلة والطريقة الصوفية، يليه ثانياً تحديد آلية التجديد وأدواته في كلا الفضائين الاجتماعيين؛ القبلي والطرقي الصوفي، ثم أخيراً تحليل صورة الآخر ومدلولاتهما في البنيتين المذكورتين.
KW  - الطريقة الصوفية،
KW  - القبيلة،
KW  - البنية،
KW  - التشابه،
KW  - لاختلاف
N2  - This research addresses the similarities and differences between the tribal structure and the Sufi order in the theoretical and practical dimensions. The introduction deals with the definition of structure in sociology in general, its elements, its role, and its transformations as a prelude to addressing our topic: A tribe and the Sufi order from a structural perspective. In the first section, the research focuses on the structure and essence of it in tribal and tariqi consciousness by analysing their perception of the concept of lineage and the tree of descent that is present in both structures. The section concludes with the pattern of relationships between the members and structures of the two structures, and therefore examines the hierarchies that were established and followed in the relationships that played a role in the perpetuation of the structure, comparing the hierarchy of status, control and leadership and the pattern of their distribution in both structures. In the second section, the research focuses on the tools and mechanisms relied upon by both; the tribe and the way to establish a symbolic dimension to the group's identity, which the group seeks to push its members to distinguish themselves from others in the environment. The first represents the circulation, creation, and appropriation of heritage from narrated history and real or imagined ancient historical events, which was handled by poetry in the tribe and Sufism with religious songs, with the presence of heroic narratives in both groups, but narrated orally in the tribe and written in the order. The second is through the embodiment of the community through a spatially defined asset, namely the Madhaffa and the zawiyah. It examined the impact of all this on the formation of identity, memory and collective imagination based on Benedict Anderson's concept of imagined communities. This research also traces the consecration of the nervousness necessary for the survival and continuity of the group, on the way to establishing a tradition that traces the tradition of the tribe, on which a nervousness is built under the tribe's blood bond. The third section of study dealt with the effectiveness of the structure (tribal and Tariqi), the nature of its tendency, and the forms of its movement, by focusing first on the tendency of expansion and spread. In addition, to comparing the limited number and location of the tribe versus the ability of the Tariqi to expand and spread, despite the fact that they both share the concept of migration, with its different meanings and implications between the two structures, as well as the concept of containment in the structure of both structures. As the Tariqi transcended and contained the tribes and penetrated the borders between them. This is followed by identifying the mechanism of renewal and its tools in both social spaces; the transformations in the structure and role of each of them as evidenced by the area of spread and friction with the city and urban centres, and their relationship with the authority in their local locations, or within the imperial sphere of the Ottoman Sultanate, and the stage of European occupation afterwards. Finally, the study is analysing the image of the other and their meanings in the two mentioned structures.
CR  - Abbâs el-Mürşid, el-İslâm el-Nâim. et-Tasavvuf fî Bilâdi’ş-Şâm, Bahs: el-Cuğrâfiyyetu’l-Mutedeyyine fî Bilâdi’ş-Şâm, Mecmûatu Baḥiseyn. Dubai: Merkez el-Mesbâr li’d-Dirâsâti ve’l-Buḥûsi, 2013.
CR  - Abdullaḥ Ḥamûdî, eş-Şeyḫu’l-Mürid. en-Nusuḳu’s̱-s̱ekâfî li’s-Ṣulta fi’l-Müctemâ‘âti’l-Arabîyyeti’l-Hadîse. Trc. Abdü’l-Mecîd Caḥfel. Dârü’l-Beyzâ: Tobukal, 2010.
CR  - Abûd el-‘Asḳarî. et-Turûḳu’ṣ-Ṣûfiyye: Vâḳea‘ ve Tumûḥ, Dâru’l-Nemîr. Şam: 2006.
CR  - Aşık Paşazâde. Osmanoğulları’nın Tarihi. Hz. Kemal Yavuz - Yekta Saraç. İstanbul: K. Kitaplığı, 2003.
CR  - Benedict Anderson. el-Cemâ‘ât’ul-Müteḫayyile: el-Teammulâtu fî Asli’l-Ḳawmiyyeti ve İntişârihâ. Beyrut: el-Merkezu’l-Arabî li’l-Abhâs ve Dirâsâti’l-Siyâset, 2014.
CR  - Buzbuca Samira. el-Tarîkatu's̱-S̱enûsiyye ve Mevâḳıfuha min Ḳadâyi’l-Asri Meḥallîyyen İklîmiyyen Duvelîyyen. Risâletu Doktorâ, Câmî‘et Uherân Ahmed bin Belle, 2017/2018.
CR  - Ebu Abdullah el-Ḳurtubi. el-Câmiu‘l-Aḥkâmi’l-Ḳur'âni. Thk. Abdullah bin el-Muḥsin el-Turkî. Beyrut: Mûessesetu’r-Risâleti li’n-Neşr, 2006.
CR  - es-Suhreverdî. Avârifu’l-Ma‘ârif. Thk. Aḥmed Abdurraḥîm es-Sâyiḥ. Kâḫire: Mektebetu’l-s̱eḳâfeti’l-Dîniyye, 2006.
CR  - Hakîm et-Tirmizî. Hatmü’l-Evliyâ. Thk. Abdülvâris Muhammed Ali. Beyrut: Dârü’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, 2005.
CR  - Ḥasan bin Muḥammed bin Ali es-Sâni. Meşmû’u’l-Fedâil fî Fenni’l-Nesebi ve Târîḫi’l-Ḳabâ’il Ḳabîleti Âl’i bin Ali ve Selîm ve’l-Me‘âdîd. Doha: Bedr li’n-Neşr, 2007.
CR  - İbn Ebî Saʿîd, Muhammed İbnü’l-Münevver. Esrârü’t-tevhîd fî makâmâti’ş-Şeyh Ebî Saʿîd. çev. Isʿaad Abdel Hâdî Kandîl. Kahire: el-Meclisü’l-Aʿlâ li’t-Terceme, 2007.
CR  - İbn Ḥaldûn. el-Muḳaddime. Thk. Abdullah Muḥammed ed-Derviş. Şam: Dâru Ya’rub, 2004.
CR  - İbn Ḥaldûn. Şifâ'us-Sâili li-Tehẕîbi’l-Mesâil. Thk. Muḥammed Muti‘ el-Ḥafız. Dar’ul-Fikri’l-Muâsır, 1996.
CR  - Muḥammed Emin el-Kurdî el-Erbilî. Tenvîru’l-Ḳulûb fî Ma‘rifeti Âllâmi’l-Guyûb. Halep: Maṭbatu’s-Ṣabâḥ, 1991.
CR  - Muḥammed Nafîse. “eṣ-Ṣûfiyye fî Dimeşk Beyne’t-Tarîkati ve’s-Siyâse”. Mecelletu Ḳalamûn: el-Mecelletu’l-Sûriyyeti’l-Ulûmi’l-İnsâniyye, 13-14, 2020.
CR  - Neil Green. eṣ-Ṣûfiyyetu Neş’etuhâ ve Târîḫuhâ, Trc. Ṣâfiye Muḫtâr. el-Memleketu’l-Muttaḥide: Mu’essesetu Hindâvî, 2018.
CR  - Okay, Orhan. El-Hayâtü’d-dîniyye, ed-Devletü’l-Osmaniyye: Tarîh ve Hadâra. Trc. Salih Sadevî. İstanbul: IRCICA, 1999.
CR  - Orhanlı, Cengiz. İskânü’l-‘aşâir fî ʿahdi’d-Devleti’l-Osmâniyye. Trc. Faruk Mustafa. Dımaşk: Dârü’t-Talîʿa el-Cedîde, 2005.
CR  - Osman Nûrî Topbaş. el-Silsiletü’ẕ-Ẕehebiyye’ṣ-Ṣûfiyye: el-Nakşibendiyye. Terc. Muḥammed İzzeddîn Seyf. İstanbul: Dâru’l-Erkâm, 2017.
CR  - Ṣaad es-Ṣûyân. eṣ-Ṣaḥrau’l-Arabîyye: s̱eḳafetuhâ ve Şi‘ruhâ Aber’l-‘Usûr Dirâsetu Antropolojiyeti. Beyrut;: eş-Şebeketu’l-Arabîyetu li’l-Abḥâsi ve’n-Neşr, 2010.
CR  - T. Parsons. The Structure of Social Action. New York: The Free Press, 1949.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.32950/rid.1586667
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4372457
ER  -