TY  - JOUR
T1  - Entangled or Entwined? Scientific Networks within Turkish Higher Education Studies:  A Secondary Data Analysis
TT  - Düğümlenmiş mi, İç İçe mi? Türk Yükseköğretim Çalışmaları İçindeki Bilimsel Ağlar: İkincil Veri Analizi
AU  - Özdemir, Murat
AU  - Aypay, Ahmet
AU  - Ayyıldız, Pinar
PY  - 2025
DA  - December
Y2  - 2025
DO  - 10.53478/yuksekogretim.1605133
JF  - Yükseköğretim Dergisi
JO  - TÜBA-HER
PB  - Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2146-796X
SP  - 623
EP  - 635
VL  - 15
IS  - 3
LA  - en
AB  - This study delves into the academic production networks inherent in Turkish higher education studies, with a particular focus on the impact of gender inequality. We employed a secondary data analysis approach, utilizing comprehensive data retrieved from the Turkish National Thesis Center database. The research data encompasses a total of 854 doctoral dissertations submitted between the years 1967 and 2020. The methodology is designed to assess the pivotal characteristics of doctoral supervisors, PhD candidates, and committees whilst exploring the roles of several parameters viz. gender, academic title, and multidisciplinary collaboration within these networks. The data analysis includes frequencies and percentages to better identify the trends and patterns. The findings reveal a significant gender imbalance in the Turkish academic landscape. Male academics occupy a rather disproportionately higher number of leadership positions compared to their female counterparts. The networking dynamics appear to work against women and junior faculty, multidisciplinary endeavors are quite rare, unlike the characteristics of the field. Fortunately, the number of female doctoral students is on the rise. Based on the research results, we suggest both cultural and structural arrangements to support women researchers and women’s studies such as funding and mentoring. These measures are essential for fostering an environment where all academics, regardless of gender, can thrive and contribute to the advancement of science.
KW  - Gender Inequality
KW  - Higher Education
KW  - Interdisciplinary Collaboration
KW  - Mentorship
KW  - Scientific Production Networks
N2  - Bu araştırma, cinsiyet eşitsizliğinin etkisine odaklanmak suretiyle Türk yükseköğretim çalışmalarındaki içkin akademik üretim ağlarını inceleme altına almaktadır. Araştırmada Türk Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanından alınan kapsamlı verileri kullanan ikincil bir veri analizi yaklaşımı benimsenmiştir. Araştırma verileri, 1967 ile 2020 yılları arasında sunulan toplam 854 doktora tezini kapsamaktadır. Araştırma deseni doktora danışmanlarının, doktora adaylarının ve komitelerin temel özelliklerini değerlendirmek ve söz konusu ağlar içindeki cinsiyet, akademik unvan ve disiplinler arası iş birliği gibi çeşitli parametrelerin rollerini keşfetmeyi hedeflemektedir. Verilerin analizi, eğilimleri ve kalıpları daha iyi belirlemek için frekansların ve yüzdelerin kullanımını içermektedir. Araştırma bulguları, Türk akademi ortamında önemli bir cinsiyet dengesizliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Erkek akademisyenler, kadın meslektaşlarına kıyasla oldukça orantısız bir şekilde daha fazla liderlik pozisyonu işgal etmektedir. Bilimsel üretim ağı dinamikleri kadınlara ve genç öğretim elemanlarının aleyhinde bir durum sergilemekte ve alanın özelliklerinin aksine disiplinler arası çabalar da oldukça nadirdir. Neyse ki, kadın doktora öğrencilerinin sayısı artış eğilimindedir. Araştırma sonuçlarından hareketle, kadın araştırmacıları ve kadın çalışmalarını destekleyecek fonlama ve mentorluk gibi hem kültürel hem de yapısal düzenlemeler önermekteyiz. Bu düzenlemeler, cinsiyete bakılmaksızın tüm akademisyenlerin gelişebileceği ve bilimin ilerlemesine katkıda bulunabileceği bir ortam için elzemdir.
CR  - Adak, N. (2018). Akademide kadınlar: Yükseköğrenime giriş ve kariyerde ilerleme. Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi, 1(1), 23-38.
CR  - Ağgül, C., Kahraman, B., & Kara, T. (2024). Kadınların lisansüstü eğitimlerini bırakma nedenleri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. 19 Mayıs Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(3), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.52835/19maysbd.1500642
CR  - Akbulut Yıldırmış, M., & Seggie, F. N. (2018). The development of higher education studies as an academic field: A literature review at international and national levels. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 8(3), 357-367. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.027
CR  - Akbulut, H. İ., Şahin, Ç., & Çepni, S. (2013). Doktora tez sürecinde karşılaşılan problemlerin belirlenmesi: Eğitim Fakültesi örneği. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(20), 50-69.
CR  - Aksay, N. K., & Yalçın, H. (2023). Kadın çalışmalarının yarım yüzyılı: Bibliyometrik bir analiz. KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 32-65. https://doi.org/10.21798/kadem.2023.127
CR  - Alpaydın, Y. (2014). Türkiye’de sosyal ve beşerî bilimlerde doktora tezi hazırlamada ana yönelimler. İnsan ve Toplum, 4(8), 1-28. dx.doi.org/10.12658/human.society.4.8.M0110
CR  - Altbach, P.G. (2014). The emergence of a field: Research and training in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1306-1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949541
CR  - Altınoluk, D. (2017). Cinsiyetlendirilmiş kurum olarak akademi: Erkek akademisyenlerin öteki üzerinden erkek inşaları. Masculinities: A Journal of Identity and Culture, 8(8), 37-58.
CR  - Arau´jo, E. B., Arau´jo, N. A. M., Moreira, A. A, Herrmann, H. J., & Andrade, J. S. Jr. (2017). Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men. PLoS One, 12(5), e0176791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176791
CR  - Astegiano, J., Sebastián-González, E., & Castanho, C. (2019). Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: A meta-analytical review. Royal Society Open Science, 6(6), 181566. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181566
CR  - Aypay, A. (Ed.) (2015). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Alanı, kapsamı ve politikaları. Pegem.
CR  - Azizi, H., Abdellatif, W., Nasrullah, M., Ali, S., Ding, J., & Khosa, F. (2021). Leadership gender disparity in the fifty highest ranking North American universities: Thematic analysis under a theoretical lens. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 98(1163), 705-709. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139615
CR  - Başarır, F., & Sarı, M. (2015). Kadın akademisyenlerin kadın akademisyen olmaya ilişkin algılarının metaforlar yoluyla incelenmesi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim, 5(1), 41-51.  https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.108
CR  - Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. SRHE/OUP.
CR  - Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (Second edition.). SRHE/OUP.
CR  - Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203.
CR  - Bravo-Hermsdorff, G., Felso, V., Ray, E., Gunderson, L. M., Helander, M. E., Maria, J., & Niv, Y. (2019). Gender and collaboration patterns in a temporal scientific authorship network. Applied Network Science, 4(4), 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0214-4
CR  - Brodin, E. M., Avery, H. (2020). Cross-disciplinary collaboration and scholarly independence in multidisciplinary learning environments at doctoral level and beyond. Minerva, 58(58), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09397-3
CR  - Clarke, J., Hurst, C., & Tomlinson, J. (2024). Maintaining the meritocracy myth: A critical discourse analytic study of leaders’ talk about merit and gender in academia. Organization Studies, 45(5), 635-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241236610
CR  - Clavero, S. & Galligan, Y. (2021). Delivering gender justice in academia through gender equality plans? Normative and practical challenges. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(28), 1115-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12658
CR  - Çögenli, M. Z., & Asunakutlu, T. (2016). Akademide mobbing: ADIM üniversiteleri örneği. Erzincan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 17-32.
CR  - Dalton, A., Wolff, K., & Bekker, B. (2021). Multidisciplinary research as a complex system. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211038400
CR  - Dimitrova, D., Mok, D., & Wellman, B. (2014). Changing ties in a far-flung, multidisciplinary research network: The case of GRAND. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(5), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214556803
CR  - Durakbaşa, A., & Karapehlivan, F. (2018). Progress and pitfalls in women’s education in Turkey. Encounters in Theory and History of Education, 19(19), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v19i0.11915
CR  - Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press.
CR  - Eldemir, P. (2021). Akademide genç kadın olmak: Özdüşünümsellik üzerinden bir tartışma. Feminist Tahayyül, 2(2), 242-272.
CR  - Etzkowitz, H., Smith, H. L., Henry, C. & Poulovassilis, A. (2020). Introduction: Pipeline break. In H. L. Smith, C. Henry, H. Etkowitz & A. Poulovassilis (Eds.), Gender, science and innovation (pp. 1-15). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438973
CR  - European Commission. (2021). She figures 2021: Gender in research and innovation statistics and indicators. Publications Office of the European Union.
CR  - Fagan, C., & Teasdale, N. (2020). Women professors across STEMM and non-STEMM disciplines: Navigating gendered spaces and playing the academic game. Work, Employment and Society, 35(4), 774-792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020916182
CR  - Friedrich, D., & Bradt, N. (2021). The dissertation and the archive: Governing a field through the production of a genre. Comparative Education Review, 65(2), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1086/713314
CR  - Gardiner, M., Tiggemann, M., Kearns, H., & Marshall, K. (2007). Show me the money! An empirical analysis of mentoring outcomes for women in academia. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658633
CR  - Ghiasi, G., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. (2015). On the compliance of women engineers with a gendered scientific system. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0145931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145931
CR  - Göktürk, D. (2022). Akademik dergilerin yayın kurullarında toplumsal cinsiyet temsiliyeti: Eğitim alanı örneği. Eğitim Bilim Toplum, 20(77), 62-92
CR  - Göktürk, Ş.  & Tülübaş, T. (2021) Survival of the fittest: women’s academic experiences of navigating neoliberal expectations in Turkish universities, Gender and Education, 33(3), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1735311
CR  - Günlük Şenesen, G. (2009). Glass ceiling in academic administration in Turkey: 1990s versus 2000s. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(4), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880903335480
CR  - Hakim, C. (1982). Secondary analysis in social research. Allen &Unwin.
CR  - Haworth, K. J., Fichtenbaum, C. J., Smith, E. P., Zimmerman, N., & Powers-Fletcher, M. V.  (2023). Value of multidisciplinary peer mentoring. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(3_supplement), A192. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0018624
CR  - Henry, C., Smith, H. L., Meschitti, V., Foss, L., & McGowan, P. (2020). Networking, gender and academia: An ecosystems approach. In H. L. Smith, C. Henry, H. Etkowitz, A. Poulovassilis (Eds.), Gender, Science and Innovation (pp. 146-167). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438973.00016
CR  - Hoştut, S. (2020). Türkiye’de devlet üniversitelerinin yönetim kurullarında kadın temsili. Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi, 3(2), 250-269. https://doi.org/10.33708/ktc.781912
CR  - Hou, C., Fan, P., Du, D., Gui, Q., & Duan, D. (2020). Does international student mobility foster scientific collaboration? Evidence from a network analysis. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(52), 327 - 344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1765316
CR  - Jansen, D., Görtz, R., & Heidler, R. (2010). Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields. Scientometrics, 83(83), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0022-1
CR  - Karataş-Özkan, M., & Chell, E. (2015). Gender inequalities in academic innovation and enterprise: A Bourdieuian analysis. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 109-125 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12020
CR  - Kentmen-Cin, C., Akbaba, Y., & Saracoglu, B. (2024). Turkey’s gender gap in higher education: An analysis of IR doctoral students, Women’s Studies International Forum, 102, 102863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102863
CR  - Kısa, H., Akca, M., & Yıldırım, C. (2023). Kadınların üst yönetimdeki görünürlüğü: Yükseköğretim kurumlarında bir araştırma. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi, 6(3), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1333446
CR  - Küçükcan, T., & Gür, B. S. (2009). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Pelin Ofset.
CR  - Ladwig, J. G. (1994). For whom this reform?: Outlining educational policy as a social field. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(3), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569940150303
CR  - Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
CR  - Martín-Alcázar, F., Ruiz-Martínez, M. & Sánchez-Gardey, G. (2020). Deepening the consequences of multidisciplinarity on research: The moderating role of social capital. Minerva 58(58), 559–583 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09404-7
CR  - McCormick, B. (2006). A feel for the game: Bourdieu, source study, and the legend. Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 28(1), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1353/sac.2006.0035
CR  - Michinov, N., & Jeanson, S. (2021). Creativity in scientific research: Multidisciplinarity fosters depth of ideas among scientists in electronic “brainwriting” groups. Human Factors, 65(7), 1542-1553. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211048301
CR  - Mkwizu, K. H. (2024). Collaborative research in higher education: Benefits for scholars in tourism. Journal of Tourism, Culinary, and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.37715/jtce.v4i1.4591
CR  - Nielsen, M., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A., & Schiebinger, L. (2017). Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 1740-1742. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700616114
CR  - Nokkala, T., Aarnikoivu, M., & Kiili, J. (2021). Multidisciplinary peer-mentoring groups supporting knowledge sharing in doctoral education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1939142
CR  - Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (1972). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. OECD Publishing.
CR  - Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
CR  - Owusu-Kwarteng, A., Forson, C., Dada, O., & Jack, S. (2025). A symbolic violence approach to gender inequality in academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 32(1), 436-457 https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13161
CR  - Oyman Bozkurt, N. (2017). Yükseköğretim kurumlarındaki güç ilişkilerinin alan kuramı bağlamında incelenmesi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 50(4), 33-82.
CR  - Özcan, H. Z., Batur, Z., & Yusufoğlu, S. (2023). Disiplinlerarası tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(13), 1646-1671. https://doi.org/10.51531/korkutataturkiyat.1384672
CR  - Özdemir, M., & Aypay, A. (2022). The academic home of Turkish higher education research: A demographic, thematic and methodological examination of doctoral dissertations. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(1), 81-130. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.972966
CR  - Özdemir, M., Aypay, A., & Kaya, E. (2024). In search of organizational actorhood: Institutional positioning statements of Turkish public universities. Higher Education Policy, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00379-8
CR  - Özdemir, M., Karaferye, F., & Aypay, A. (2021). The subject of Turkish higher education research: The case of faculty members. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim, 11(3), 545-558. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.963751
CR  - Özoğlu, M., Gür, B. S., & Gümüs, S. (2016). Rapid expansion of higher education in Turkey: The challenges of recently established public universities (2006–2013). Higher Education Policy, 29(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.7
CR  - Öztan, E., & Doğan, S. N. (2015). Akademinin cinsiyeti: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi örneği üzerinden üniversite ve toplumsal cinsiyet. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3(46), 191-222.
CR  - Pilbeam, C., Lloyd-Jones, G., & Denyer, D. (2013). Leveraging value in doctoral student networks through social capital. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1472-1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.636800
CR  - Poggio, B. (2006). Outline of a theory of gender practices. Gender, Work & Organization 13(3), 225–233.
CR  - Rogg, E. (2001). Passion and pain in academia. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 9(3), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/713801038
CR  - Rothstein, M. G. & Davey, L. M. (1995). Gender differences in network relationships in academia. Women in Management Review, 10(6), 6, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429510095999
CR  - Savaş, G., Ertan, S., & Yol, F. (2018). Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin kadın araştırmaları merkezleri profili araştırması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(68), 1527-1547.
CR  - Seckin, O., & Varol, O. (2022). Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity. EPJ Data Science, 11(57), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00369-z
CR  - Sezgin, F. H. & Haykır Hobikoğlu, E. (2022). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim kurumlarında istihdamda cinsiyet açığının istatistiksel analizi, KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.21798/kadem.2022.110
CR  - Siciliano, M. D., Welch, E. W., & Feeney, M. K. (2018). Network exploration and exploitation: Professional network churn and scientific production. Social Networks, 52(52), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.07.003
CR  - Tauber, S. (2020). Undoing gender in academia: Personal reflections on equal opportunity schemes. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1718-1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12516
CR  - Teichler, U. (2000) Higher education research and its institutional basis. In S. Schwarz & U. Teichler (Eds), The institutional basis of higher education research. Experiences and perspectives (pp. 13–24). Kluwer.
CR  - Teichler, U. (2015). Higher education research in Europe. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 815-847). Springer.
CR  - Tekindal, M., Aldırmaz, Y., Çoban, B., Tekindal, M. A. (2024). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim kurumlarında cinsiyetin genel görünümü: sayısal veriler ışığında bir analiz. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 14(1), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1336187
CR  - Telli, S. G. (2018). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim sistemi üzerine düşünceler. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.482681
CR  - Tepe, N. (2018). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim alanında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi (1990-2017). Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(19), 1727-1744.
CR  - Trowler, P. (2014). Academic tribes and territories: The theoretical trajectory. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, 25(3), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.25365/oezg-2014-25-3-2
CR  - Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (Eds.). (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st-century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. Routledge.
CR  - Turnbull, S. M., Locke, K., Vanholsbeeck, F., & O’Neale, D. R. (2019). Bourdieu, networks, and movements: Using the concepts of habitus, field and capital to understand a network analysis of gender differences in undergraduate physics. PloS One, 14(9), e0222357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222357
CR  - Üniversiteler Arası Kurul. (2021). Bilim alanları ve anahtar kelimeler [/Scientific fields and keywords]/. Retrieved from https://www.uak.gov.tr/Documents/docentlik/2019-ekim-donemi/2019E_BilimAlanlariAnahtarKelimeler_250919.pdf
CR  - van den Brink, M. & Benschop, Y. (2012), Slaying the seven-headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(19), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x
CR  - Varga, A., Pontikakis, D., & Chorafakis, G. (2014). Metropolitan Edison and Cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(14), 229-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/JEG/LBS041
CR  - Winslow, S., & Davis, S. (2016). Gender inequality across the academic life course. Sociology Compass, 10(10), 404-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/SOC4.12372
CR  - Wolniak, G. C., Chen-Bendle, E. C., & Tackett, J. L. (2023). Exploring gender differences in leadership aspirations: A Four-year longitudinal study of college students from adverse backgrounds. AERA Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231183665
CR  - Yang, Y., Tian, T., Woodruff, T., Jones, B., & Uzzi, B. (2022). Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(36), e2200841119.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200841119
CR  - Yenilmez, M. İ. (2016). Women in academia in Turkey: Challenges and opportunities. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(28), 289-311.
CR  - Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2022). Doktora öğretiminin iyileştirilmesi çalıştay raporu. Ankara University Press.
CR  - Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2024). Üniversite izleme ve değerlendirme genel raporu 2024. YÖK.
CR  - Yükseköğretim Kurulu (n.d.). Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
CR  - Zuo, Z., & Zhao, K. (2018). The more multidisciplinary the better? – The prevalence and interdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 736-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.006
UR  - https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1605133
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4457190
ER  -