TY - JOUR T1 - Healthcare worker and nonhealthcare worker mothers' experiences of vaginal examination in labour and their views on birth satisfaction TT - Sağlık Çalışanı Olan ve Olmayan Annelerin Travayda Yapılan Vajinal Muayene Hakkındaki Görüşleri ve Doğum Memnuniyetleri AU - Şahin, Ezgi AU - Yazıcı, Saadet PY - 2025 DA - March Y2 - 2025 DO - 10.53424/balikesirsbd.1628610 JF - Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi JO - BAUN Health Sci J PB - Balıkesir University WT - DergiPark SN - 2146-9601 SP - 81 EP - 88 VL - 14 IS - 1 LA - en AB - Objective: Birth satisfaction is an extremely important issue for both the woman's own health, the health of the baby, and positive family relationships. This study was conducted to reveal the opinions of healthcare and nonhealthcare worker mothers about vaginal examination during labor and their birth satisfaction. Materials and Methods: The sample of this cross-sectional and comparative study consisted of 408 mothers who gave vaginal birth between the ages of 18-45. Demographic Information Form, Birth Satisfaction Scale-Short Form, and Women's Vaginal Examination Experiences at Birth Scale were used to collect data. Independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA and one-way MANOVA were used to analyze the data. Results: Birth satisfaction and vaginal examination experience were found to be associated with education level, occupation, number of pregnancies, number of live births, antenatal education, number of vaginal examinations in the last delivery, the person who performed the vaginal examination, the person who delivered the baby and the interventions performed during delivery (amniotomy, artificial labour, fundal pressure, intervention delivery) (p KW - Birth KW - Birth Experience KW - Satisfaction KW - Vaginal Examination N2 - Amaç: Doğum memnuniyeti hem kadının kendi sağlığı hem bebeğin sağlığı hem de olumlu aile ilişkileri açısından son derece önemli bir konudur. Bu çalışma, sağlık çalışanı olan ve olmayan annelerin travayda vajinal muayeneye ilişkin görüşlerini ve doğum memnuniyetlerini ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kesitsel ve karşılaştırmalı olan bu çalışmanın örneklemini 18-45 yaş aralığında vajinal doğum yapan 408 anne oluşturmuştur. Veri toplamak için Demografik Bilgi Formu, Doğum Memnuniyet Ölçeği-Kısa Formu ve Kadınların Travayda Vajinal Muayene Deneyimleri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde bağımsız örneklem t-testi, tek yönlü ANOVA ve tek yönlü MANOVA analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Doğum memnuniyeti ve vajinal muayene deneyiminin; eğitim seviyesi, meslek, gebelik sayısı, canlı doğum sayısı, antenatal eğitim, son doğumda vajinal muayene sayısı, deneyimi ve vajinal muayeneyi yapan kişi, doğumu yaptıran kişi ve doğumda uygulanan girişimler (amniyotomi, suni sancı, fundal basınç, müdahaleli doğum) ile ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur (p CR - Afacan, M. (2018). Women's experiences of vaginal examination during labor: Reliability and validity study of the Turkish adaptation of Lewin's scale. [Unpublished master's thesis]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir. CR - Bonilla-Escobar, F.J., Ortega-Lenis, D., Rojas-Mirquez, J.C., & Ortega-Loubon, C. (2016). Panamanian women׳s experience of vaginal examination in labour: A questionnaire validation. Midwifery, 36, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.022 CR - Borders, N., Lawton, R., & Martin, S.R. (2012). A clinical audit of the number of vaginal examinations in labor:a NOVEL idea. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 57(2),139-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00128.x CR - Dabagh-Fekri, S., L. Amiri-Farahani, L.A., & Pezaro, S (2020). A Survey of Iranian primiparous women's perceptions of vaginal examination during labor. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132720940517 CR - De Klerk, H.W., E. Boere, R.H. van Lunsen, R., & Bakker, J.J.H. (2018). Women's experiences with vaginal examinations during labor in the Netherlands. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology,39(2),90–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1291623 CR - Dencker, A., C. Taft, L. Bergqvist, H. Lilja., & Berg, M. (2010). Childbirth experience questionnaire CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-81 CR - Downe, S., Gyte, G. M., Dahlen, H. G., & Singata, M. (2013). Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,7, CD010088.https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010088.pub2 CR - El-Moniem, E.F.A., & Mohamady, S.H. (2016). Effect of vaginal examination frequency practice during normal childbirth on psychophysical condition of women. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science,5(6), 36-44. DOI: 10.4274/cjms.2023.2023-15 CR - Göncü, S. (2015). Adaptation of the Short Form of the Birth Satisfaction Scale to Turkish and Determination of its Psychometric Properties. Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Karabük, 11-20. CR - Hassan, S. J., Sundby, J., Husseini, A., & Bjertness, E. (2012). The paradox of vaginal examination practice during normal childbirth: Palestinian women's feelings, opinions, knowledge and experiences. Reproductive health, 9, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742- 4755-9-16 CR - Hinic, K. (2017). Understanding and promoting birth satisfaction in new mothers. MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing, 42(4),210–215. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000345. CR - Hatamleh, R., H. Gharibeh., & Bnayan, A.A. (2012). Jordanian women's perceptions of intrapartum vaginal examination. Evidence Based Midwifery, 10(4), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1891/2156- 5287.3.3.153 CR - Hildingsson, I., M. Johansson, A. Karlström., & Fenwick, J. (2013). Factors associated with a positive birth experience: an exploration of Swedish women's experiences. International Journal of Childbirth, 3(3), 153–164. CR - Lewin, D., Fearon, B., Hemmings, V., & Johnson, G. (2005). Women’s experiences of vaginal examinations inlabour. Midwifery, 21(3),267–277.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2004.10.003 CR - Martin, C. H., & Fleming, V. (2011). The birth satisfaction scale. International Journal of health care quality assurance,24(2),124–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526861111105086 CR - Martin H.C.J., & Martin, R.C. (2014). Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R), Midwifery, 30,610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006 CR - Maskálová, E., L. Mazúchová, S. Kelčíková, J. Samselyová., & Kukučiarová, L. (2021). Women's satisfaction with childbirth. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 12(4), 537-544.https://doi.org:10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0031 CR - Mortazavi, F., & Mehrabadi, M. (2022). Predictors of low birth satisfaction among Iranian postpartum women: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Open, 9(1),604–613. CR - Serhatlıoğlu, G.S., & Karahan, N. (2018). Birth satisfaction and affecting factors. International Refereed Journal of Gynecology and Maternal and Child Health, 5(12),75-91. https://doi.org:10.17367/JACSD.2018.1.8 CR - Smarandache, A., T.H. Kim, Y. Bohr., & Tamim, H. (2016). Predictors of a negative labour and birth experience based on a national survey of Canadian women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 114. https://doi.org:10.1186/s12884-016-0903-2 CR - Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J.P. (2008). Declaración de la Iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 82, 251-259. CR - Weeks, F., L. Pantoja, J. Ortiz, J. Foster, G. Cavada., & Binfa, L. (2017). Labor and birth care satisfaction associated with medical interventions and accompaniment during labor among Chilean women. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 62(2),196–203. CR - WHO (World Health Organization). (2018). WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization. Accessed: 5 May 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215eng.pdf;jsessionid=2D0982E57D1358C69CBE8BB28453AEF?sequence=1 UR - https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1628610 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4559389 ER -