TY  - JOUR
T1  - Teacher Educators’ Assessment Approaches in Mathematics Method Courses for Prospective Primary Teachers
AU  - Yılmaz Aslan, Bilge
AU  - Özmantar, Mehmet Fatih
AU  - Kuşdemir Kayıran, Bilge
PY  - 2025
DA  - August
Y2  - 2025
DO  - 10.30900/kafkasegt.1651843
JF  - e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research
JO  - e-KJER
PB  - Kafkas University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2148-8940
SP  - 557
EP  - 575
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
LA  - en
AB  - This study examines the assessment approaches employed by teacher educators (TEs) in mathematics method courses designed for prospective primary school teachers in Türkiye. Given the limited research on TEs’ assessment strategies, this study aims to address a significant gap in the literature by exploring how TEs conduct assessment in their courses. A comprehensive survey was administered to 90 TEs across 71 universities in Türkiye, with responses obtained from 65 TEs (72% response rate). The survey instrument was designed to capture the range of assessment methods and tools used by TEs. Frequency analysis revealed a strong preference for traditional assessment tools and formats, such as written exams, while performance-based assessments and project evaluations were moderately utilized. Additionally, a notable trend toward personalized assessment tools was observed, with many TEs developing their own instruments. The findings are discussed through three key perspectives: the authenticity of assessment, student involvement, and quality assurance. Results indicate that while traditional methods remain dominant, there is a need for more diversified and reflective assessment approaches that align with the complex realities of teaching. The study suggests that enhancing assessment practices could improve the preparation of future teachers by fostering deeper engagement with mathematical concepts and instructional strategies. These results contribute to the ongoing discussion on teacher education by emphasizing the need for assessment practices that balance standardization with adaptability. The study highlights implications for both policy and practice, advocating for a more comprehensive assessment framework in teacher education programs.
KW  - Assessment
KW  - teacher educators
KW  - mathematics method courses
KW  - prospective teachers
KW  - teacher education
CR  - Aydın, M., Baki, A., Köğce, D., & Yıldız, C. (2009). Mathematics teacher educators’ beliefs about assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2126-2130. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.372
CR  - Başol, G., Çakan, M., Kan, A., Özbek, Ö. Y., Özdmir, D., & Yaşar, M. (2013). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
CR  - Birgin, O., & Gürbüz, R. (2008). Examining the level of knowledge of prospective primary school teachers about measurement and evaluation. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (20), 163-179.
CR  - Bosica, J., Pyper, J. S., & MacGregor, S. (2021). Incorporating problem-based learning in a secondary school mathematics preservice teacher education course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103335. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103335
CR  - Brookhart,S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Research Review, 67(3), 343-368. doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.929565
CR  - Bruna, C. R. (2025). Enhancing Primary Teacher Training through Academic Portfolios in Advanced Mathematics Courses. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06159.  doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.06159
CR  - Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1988). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. ETS Research Report Series, 1988(1), i-148. doi:10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00291.x
CR  - Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., & Çakmak, E. K. (2015). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
CR  - Camarata, T., & Slieman, T. A. (2020). Improving student feedback quality: A simple model using peer review and feedback rubrics. Journal of medical education and curricular development, 7, 2382120520936604. doi:10.1177/2382120520936604
CR  - Dahlback, J., Olstad, H. B., Sylte, A. L., & Wolden, A. C. (2020). The importance of authentic workplace-based assessment: A study from VET teacher education. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), 7(3), 302-324. doi:10.25656/01:21232
CR  - Deborah, L. J., Baskaran, R., & Kannan, A. (2010). A survey on internal validity measure for cluster validation. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Survey, 1(2), 85-102. doi:10.5121/ijcses.2010.1207
CR  - Demir, M. (2015). Comparative investigation of alternative assessment methods used in Türkiye and United States elementary 4th grade mathematics curriculum. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). İnönü University, Malatya.
CR  - Dickinson, P., & Adams, J. (2017). Values in evaluation–The use of rubrics. Evaluation and program planning, 65(2017), 113-116. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.005
CR  - Farahian, M., & Avarzamani, F. (2018). The impact of portfolio on EFL learners’ metacognition and writing performance. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1450918.  doi:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1450918
CR  - Galang, A. D., Conde, R. L., & Sudarsana, I. K. (2021). Mga kwento ng guro at kwentong mag-aaral: student assessment processes, challenges and solutions In the New Normal Setup Leading To Quality Assurance Inputs. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 7(2), 171-187. doi:10.25078/jpm.v7i2.2351
CR  - Gulikers, J. T., Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2008). The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 172-186. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.012
CR  - He, S., & Qi, C. (2022). The perceived impact of PBL program learning on shifting prospective teachers’ beliefs: A case study in China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2195. doi:10.29333/ejmste/12693
CR  - Hill, H., Umland, K., Litke, E. & Kapitula, L. (2012). Teacher Quality and Quality Teaching: Examining the Relationship of a Teacher Assessment to Practice. American Journal of Education, 118(4), 489-519. doi:10.1086/666380
CR  - Karakuş, F., & Kösa, T. (2009). Primary Teachers’ Views Concerning the Assessment Methods Used by Them. Milli Eğitim, 38(181), 184-197.
CR  - Kastberg, G., & Siverbo, S. (2013). The design and use of management accounting systems in process oriented health care–an explorative study. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(3), 246-270. doi:10.1111/faam.12014
CR  - Karasar, N. (2009). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
CR  - Kilimci, S. (2006). The comparison of initial teacher training programmes of germany, france, england and Türkiye (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
CR  - Lorente, E., & Kirk, D. (2013). Alternative democratic assessment in PETE: an action-research study exploring risks, challenges and solutions. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 77-96.  doi:10.1080/13573322.2012.713859
CR  - Maher, N., & Muir, T. (2013). " I Know You Have to Put Down a Zero, but I'm Not Sure Why": Exploring the Link between Pre-Service Teachers' Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 15(1), 72-87.
CR  - Muhammad, A., Lebar, O., & Mokshein, S. E. (2018). Rubrics as assessment, evaluation and scoring tools. International journal of academic research in business and social sciences, 8(10), 1417-1431. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/5309
CR  - Murphy, L., Wilson, J., & Greenberg, S. (2017). Equine-assisted experiential learning in occupational therapy education. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(4), 366-376  doi:10.1177/1053825917712732
CR  - Raji, M. O. (2023). Conceptions and Practices of Assessment: Case Studies of Nigerian Teacher Educators. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.
CR  - Rawlusyk, P. E. (2018). Assessment in higher education and student learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 21
CR  - Sabancı, O., & Yazıcı, K. (2017). Examining Pre-service Teachers’ Efficacy Perceptions towards Measurement and Evaluation. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1) 128-153.
CR  - Santagata, R., & Lee, J. (2021). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: a study of novice elementary school teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 33-60. doi:10.1007/s10857-019-09447-y
CR  - Schellekens, L. H., Kremer, W. D., Van der Schaaf, M. F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., & Bok, H. G. (2023, June). Between theory and practice: educators’ perceptions on assessment quality criteria and its impact on student learning. In Frontiers in Education. 8(2023), 1-9.   doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1147213
CR  - Sewagegn, A. A. (2019). A Study on the Assessment Methods and Experiences of Teachers at an Ethiopian University. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 605-622.   doi:10.29333/iji.2019.12238a
CR  - Simpson, A. (2016). Designing pedagogic strategies for dialogic learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 135-151.    doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1038580
CR  - Şahin, Ç., & Öztürk, Y. A. (2014). Opinions of prospective teachers on alternative assessment-evaluation methods. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(1), 123-142.
CR  - Şaşmaz Ören, F., & Meriç, G. (2014). Seventh Grade Students' Perceptions of Using Concept Cartoons in Science and Technology Course. Online Submission, 2(2), 116-136.   doi:10.18404/ijemst.86308
CR  - Tigelaar, D. E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2010). The Evaluation of Prospective Teachers in Teacher Education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed., pp. 511-517). doi:10.4236/ce.2015.610093
CR  - Tong, F. (2022). Psychological and pedagogical effects on engagement and achievement: implications for literacy and maths learning. Educational Psychology 42, 931 - 933. doi:10.1080/01443410.2022.2140275
CR  - Twohill, A., NicMhuirí, S., Harbison, L., & Karakolidis, A. (2023). Primary preservice teachers’ mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs: The role played by mathematics attainment, educational level, preparedness to teach, and gender. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 601-622. doi:10.1007/s10763-022-10259-5
CR  - Vesga-Bravo, G. J., Angel-Cuervo, Z. M., & Chacón-Guerrero, G. A. (2022). Beliefs about mathematics, its teaching, and learning: Contrast between pre-service and in-service teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(4), 769-791. doi:10.1007/s10763-021-10164-3
CR  - Yeşilyurt, E., & Yaraş, Z. (2011). Assessment of classroom teacher candidates’ perception of knowledge level about measurement and evaluation methods. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 12(4), 95-118.
CR  - Yenice, N., Özden, B., & Tunç, G. A. (2017). The Investigation of Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Using Alternative Assessment and Evaluation Approaches. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 367-397.
CR  - Yıldız, İ., & Uyanık, N. (2004). Matematik eğitiminde ölçme-değerlendirme üzerine [On measurement and evaluation in mathematics education]. Gazi Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi.12(1) 97-104.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1651843
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4663505
ER  -