TY  - JOUR
T1  - Suggestions on The White Paint Decorated Ware Tradition of the Samsun Region And Its Spread in Light of New Evidence
AU  - Türker, Atila
AU  - Tırıl Özbilgin, Cahide Gizem
PY  - 2025
DA  - March
Y2  - 2024
JF  - OLBA
JO  - Yok
PB  - Mersin University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1301-7667
SP  - 51
EP  - 77
IS  - XXXIII
LA  - en
AB  - This study discusses the white paint decorated pottery found during the surveys in the Samsun Region and the excavations at Dombalaktepe. This group of finds indicates the existence of a tradition of paint decoration that is not lim- ited to the region but is widespread in the central and western half of Anatolia. In this article the origin, decoration types, chronology and distribution of this tradition are analyzed. The material studied was classified according to vessel and decoration types and compared with its parallels. Although the findings suggest that the origin of the white painted pottery tradition can be traced back to the Neolithic cultures of Southwestern Europe and Continental Greece, the decoration of vessels with linear lines has been observed to be dominant starting from the Anatolian coasts and has actually formed its own tradition. There is no continuity between the emergence of this tradition and the Neo- lithic, and the material characteristics have changed completely. Although some references indicate that the beginning of white painted pottery in Anatolia can be traced back to the Early Chalcolithic period, it continued to exist distinctly from the Middle Chalcolithic period until the end of the Early Bronze II peri- od. Its distribution was not widespread throughout Anatolia, but clustered in certain regions. After the coastal and Inner Aegean regions, it reached the Cen- tral Taurus and North-Central Anatolia via two different routes. The motivation for this may have been the search for new sources of raw materials, especially copper deposits. We do not know whether the tradition was carried by a par- ticular community particular community carried the tradition or whether it was a fashion reflecting the taste of the period. However, it is noteworthy that white painted ceramics are not found in Thrace, Eastern Marmara and Central Anatolia, and this may be due to the presence of different communities domi- nating these regions! At least, the absence fact that of any examples are found at least in Eastern Anatolia allows us to see the range and limits boundaries of its distribution. The white painted pottery tradition did not make use of the rich colours and varied decorations of the preceding Neolithic Age, preferring monochrome decorations with simpler motifs. Therefore, no special skills were required in the procurement and application of paint, and pottery was probably not a specialised occupation. We can understand that the community carrying the tradition did not prioritise preferences and aesthetic values, as evidenced by the lack of substantial changes in painted decoration over this period spanning approximately 3000 (between around 5500-2500 BC) years, during which the repertoire of colours narrowed. Within this framework, the sample of about 50 sherds found during the excavation at Dombalaktepe, the typology of the white painted ceramics and the calibrated radiocarbon data allow us to make a speculative approach to the meaning of the spread of this tradition in Anatolia.
KW  - Anatolia
KW  - Black Sea
KW  - Samsun Archaeology
KW  - Dombalaktepe
KW  - Chalcolithic
and Early Bronze Age
KW  - White Paint Decorated Ware.
CR  - Akdeniz 2011 E. Akdeniz, “Kuşadası Kadıkalesi Kazısı›nın ilk Tunç Çağı Buluntuları", Karadeniz'den Fırat'a Bilgi Üretimleri Önder Bilgi'ye Armağan Yazılar (eds. A. Öztan – Ş. Dönmez), Ankara, 1-22. Kurumu Kongresi VIII/1, Ankara, 151-157.
CR  - Alkım et al. 1988 U.B. Alkım – H. Alkım – Ö. Bilgi, İkiztepe I. Birinci ve İkinci Dönem Kazıları / The First and Second Seasons’ Excavations (1974- 1975), Ankara.
CR  - Alkım et al. 2003 U. B. Alkım – H. Alkım – Ö. Bilgi, İkiztepe II. Üçüncü, Dördüncü, Beşinci, Altıncı, Yedinci Dönem Kazıları (1976-1980), Ankara.
CR  - Alram-Stern 1996 E. Alram-Stern, Die Ägäische Frühzeit, 1. Band: Das Neolithikum in Griechenland mit Ausnahme von Kreta und Zypern (Der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften), Wien 1996.
CR  - Arık 1939 R.O. Arık, “Anadolu’nun En Garp Eti İstasyonu Karaoğlan Höyüğü”, Belleten III, 27-42.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/olba/issue//1663338
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4715094
ER  -