TY  - JOUR
T1  - Public Budgets as Expressions of Political Culture and Collective Imagination
TT  - Politik Kültür ve Kolektif Tahayyülün Dışavurumu Olarak Kamu Bütçeleri
AU  - Cömert, Metehan
PY  - 2025
DA  - September
Y2  - 2025
DO  - 10.52836/sayistay.1725431
JF  - Sayıştay Dergisi
JO  - TCA Journal
PB  - T.C. Sayıştay Başkanlığı
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1300-1981
SP  - 493
EP  - 516
VL  - 36
IS  - 138
LA  - en
AB  - This article begins with a suspicion: the presumed neutrality of public budgetsis a well-founded illusion. What is the definition of public budgeting, and what is atstake when we reduce it to a technical or administrative routine? This study makesa theoretical intervention into the dominant technocratic approaches by imaginingpublic budgets as culturally embedded and politically contested practices. Drawing onAaron Wildavsky’s writings, I argue that the post-political vision of budgeting –whichframes fiscal decisions as apolitical matters of expertise– obscures the ideologicalunderpinnings of public budgets. Against this ‘rational’ logic, I propose a politicizedunderstanding of public budgeting that calls for a radical break from conventional,depoliticized perspectives. The conclusion outlines emancipatory possibilities thatcould transform budgets from tools of control into instruments of collective selfdetermination and democratic reimagination.
KW  - budget
KW  - public budget
KW  - politics
KW  - culture
KW  - political culture.
N2  - Bu makalede, kamu bütçelerine atfedilen ‘tarafsızlık’ iddiasının aslında özenleinşa edilmiş bir yanılsama olduğu yönünde bir şüpheden hareket edilmektedir. “Kamubütçesi nedir?” sorusu ile birlikte, bütçelerin salt teknik ya da idari bir rutin olaraktanımlanmasının bu süreçlerin ideolojik, kültürel ve siyasal boyutlarını nasıl görünmezkıldığı sorgulanmaktadır. Çalışmada, egemen teknokratik yaklaşımlara kuramsalmüdahalelerde bulunularak, bütçeleme süreçlerinin kültürel olarak şekillendiği vesiyasal mücadelelerle iç içe geçtiği savunulmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, Aaron Wildavsky’ninmetinlerinden hareketle, bütçe kararlarını apolitik birer uzmanlık meselesi olarak sunanpost-politik tahayyülün, kamu bütçelerinin ideolojik boyutlarını görünmez kıldığı önesürülmektedir. Tarafsızlık iddiasıyla meşrulaştırılan bu ‘rasyonel’ bütçeleme anlayışınakarşı, çalışmada bütçeyi siyasallaştıran bir perspektif önerilmekte ve yerleşik teknokratiksöylemlere karşı teorik düzlemde itirazlar geliştirilmektedir. Sonuç bölümünde ise,bütçelerin birer toplumsal kontrol aracından kolektif katılım ve demokratik tahayyülimkânlarını barındıran özgürleştirici araçlara dönüştürülebileceği yönündeki olasılıklarana hatlarıyla ortaya konmaktadır..
CR  - Allen, R., Hemming R. and Potter B. H. (2013). The International Handbook of Public Financial
Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
CR  - Appadurai, A. (2017). Democracy Fatigue. The Great Regression. (Ed.) Geiselberger, H.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
CR  - Burnham, P. (2000). Globalization, Depoliticization and ‘Modern’ Economic Management.
Politics of Change: Globalization, Ideology, and Critique. (Eds.) Bonefeld, W. and
Psychopedis, K. Palgrave: New York.
CR  - Butler, E. (2012). Public Choice: A Primer. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
CR  - Caiden, N. (1994). The Management of Public Budgeting. Comparative Public Management.
(Ed.) Baker, R. Westport, CT: Praeger.
CR  - Cropf, R. A. (2007). American Public Administration: Public Service for the 21st Century.
Routledge.
CR  - Dahl, R. A. and Lindblom C. E. (1953). Politics, Economics, and Welfare. The University of
Chicago Press.
CR  - De Grove, J. M. (1965). Review of the Politics of the Budgetary Process. The Yale Law
Journal, 74 (3), 588-593.
CR  - Dennard, L. F. (2008). The Budget Process as Complex Civic Space: Wildavsky and Radical
Incrementalism. Administration & Society, 40(6), 645-658.
CR  - Eckstein, H. (1988). A Culturalist Theory of Political Change. American Political Science
Review, 82, 789-804.
CR  - Formisano, R. P. (2001). The Concept of Political Culture. The Journal of Interdisciplinary
History, 31 (3), 393-426.
CR  - Freire, P. (2017). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Penguin Classics.
CR  - Gilley, B. (2017). Technocracy and Democracy as Spheres of Justice in Public Policy. Policy
Sciences, 50 (1), 9-22.
CR  - Heiser, H. C. (1959). Budgeting: Principles and Practice. New York: The Ronald Press
Company.
CR  - Horkheimer, M. ([1937] 1976). Traditional and Critical Theory. Critical Sociology. (Ed.)
Connerton, P. London: Penguin.
CR  - Hyde, A. C. (1992). Government Budgeting: Theory, Process, and Politics. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks.
CR  - Jones, L. R. and Mccafery, J. L. (1994). Budgeting according to Wildavsky: A Bibliographic
Essay. Public Budgeting & Finance, 14(1), 16-43.
CR  - Genç, M. (2010). Gender Budgeting and Efficency in Public Services. Journal of Turkish
Court of Accounts, (77), 33-62.
CR  - Khan, A. and Hildreth W. B. (2002). Budget Theory in the Public Sector. London: Quorum
Books.
CR  - Koven, S. G. (2002). The Influence of Political Culture on State Budgets: Another Look at
Elazar’s Formulation. American Review of Public Administration, 32 (1), 66-77.
CR  - Lazzarato, M. (2011). The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition.
Semiotext(e) Intervention.
CR  - Miller, G. J. (2012). Government Budgeting and Financial Management in Practice: Logics to
Make Sense of Ambiguity. CRC Press.
CR  - Mouffe, C. (2005). On The Political. New York: Routledge.
CR  - Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
CR  - Padgett, J. F. (1980). Bounded Rationality in Budgetary Research. The American Political
Science Review, 74(2). 354-372.
CR  - Pehlivan, O. (2022). Devlet Bütçesi. Ekin Yayınevi.
CR  - Ross, A. (2014). Creditocracy and the Case for Debt Refusal. OR Books.
CR  - Rubin, I. S. (2000). The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and
Balancing. London: Seven Bridges Press.
CR  - Sakal, M. and Karadeniz, M. (2021). Devlet Bütçesi, Savaş Yayınevi.
CR  - Schick, A. (1983). Incremental Budgeting in a Decremental Age. Policy Sciences, 16 (1), 1-25.
CR  - Schmitt, C. ([1929] 2007). The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations. Concept of the
Political. (Trans.) Konzett, M. and McCormick, J. P. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
CR  - Schumpeter J. A. ([1918] 1954). The Crisis of the Tax State. International Economic Papers.
(Eds.) Peacock, A.T., Stolper, W.F., Turvey R. and Henderson, E. London: MacMillan.
CR  - Starr, P. (1989). The Meaning of Privatization. Privatization and the Welfare State. (Eds.)
Kamerman, S. B. and Kahn, A. J. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
CR  - Streeck, W. (2014). Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism London:
Verso.
CR  - Streeck, W. (2017). The Return of the Repressed as the Beginning of the End of Neoliberal
Capitalism. The Great Regression. (Ed.) Geiselberger, H. Cambridge: Polity Press.
CR  - Thompson, M, Ellis R.J. and Wildavsky A. B. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview
Press.
CR  - Tüğen, K. (2024). Devlet Bütçesi. Bassaray Yayıncılık.
CR  - Wehner, J. (2015). Aaron Wildavsky, The Politics of the Budgetary Process. The Oxford
Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration. Oxford University Press.
CR  - Wildavsky, A. B. (1961). Political Implications of Budgetary Reform. Public Administration
Review, 21(4), 183–90.
CR  - Wildavsky, A. B. (1964). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little Brown.
CR  - Wildavsky, A. B. (1985). A Cultural Theory of Expenditure Growth and (Un)Balanced Budgets.
Journal of Public Economics, 28(3), 349-357.
CR  - Wildavsky, A. B. (1988). A Cultural Theory of Budgeting. International Journal of Public
Administration, 11 (6), 651-677.
CR  - Wildavsky, A. B. (1992). The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. New York: Harper Collins.
CR  - Wildavsky, A. (2018). Budgeting as a Political Process. The Revolt Against the Masses. (Ed.)
Wildavsky, A. Routledge.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1725431
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4983807
ER  -