TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evolution of TRIGA Research Reactor: A Critical Review of Design, Safety, Utilization and Modernization
TT  - The Evolution of the TRIGA Research Reactor: A Comprehensive Overview
AU  - Hossen, Md Altaf
PY  - 2026
DA  - June
Y2  - 2026
DO  - 10.59474/nuclear.2023.68
JF  - Journal of Nuclear Sciences
PB  - Ankara University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2147-7736
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
LA  - en
AB  - The Training Research Isotopes General Atomics (TRIGA) has probably been the most widely used research-reactor platform for education, neutron activation analysis, isotope production, reactor-physics experiments and operator training. There, its unparalleled and continual relevance is a function of uranium-zirconium hydride (U-ZrH) fuel and its prompt negative temperature coefficient which offers a robust inherent feedback mechanism to resist reactivity and thermal excursions. This review critically analyzes the past developments, design principles, reactor-physics fundamentals, comparative advantages, global distribution and use, modernization challenges and future directions of TRIGA reactors. The paper is focused specifically on quantitative performance indicators including conventional neutron flux ranges, steady-state power classes, pulse characteristics and safety-relevant fuel properties. To clarify this uniqueness and the limitations on TRIGA reactors, the review compares it with a few other reactor types including material testing reactors, heavy-water moderated research reactors and conventional pool-type systems. TRIGA reactors are still attractive owing to their accessibility, pulsing capability, passive safety behaviour and educational utility, but they depend on reliable LEU fuel supply, ageing-management programmes, digital instrumentation upgrades and regulatory compliance as well as user level for longevity.
KW  - TRIGA
KW  - Evolution
KW  - UZrH
KW  - Non-proliferation
KW  - Pulsing
N2  - The Training Research Isotopes General Atomics (TRIGA) has probably been the most widely used research-reactor platform for education, neutron activation analysis, isotope production, reactor-physics experiments and operator training. There, its unparalleled and continual relevance is a function of uranium-zirconium hydride (U-ZrH) fuel and its prompt negative temperature coefficient which offers a robust inherent feedback mechanism to resist reactivity and thermal excursions. This review critically analyzes the past developments, design principles, reactor-physics fundamentals, comparative advantages, global distribution and use, modernization challenges and future directions of TRIGA reactors. The paper is focused specifically on quantitative performance indicators including conventional neutron flux ranges, steady-state power classes, pulse characteristics and safety-relevant fuel properties. To clarify this uniqueness and the limitations on TRIGA reactors, the review compares it with a few other reactor types including material testing reactors, heavy-water moderated research reactors and conventional pool-type systems. TRIGA reactors are still attractive owing to their accessibility, pulsing capability, passive safety behaviour and educational utility, but they depend on reliable LEU fuel supply, ageing-management programmes, digital instrumentation upgrades and regulatory compliance as well as user level for longevity.
CR  - [1] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Research Reactor Database (RRDB). Vienna: IAEA. Accessed 20 May 2026.
CR  - [2] International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA). Applications of Research Reactors. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-5.3. Vienna: IAEA; 2014.
CR  - [3] International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA). History, Development and Future of TRIGA Research Reactors. Technical Reports Series No. 482. Vienna: IAEA; 2016.
CR  - [4] General Atomics. TRIGA® Research Test Reactors. General Atomics Fission Energy Systems. Accessed 20 May 2026.
CR  - [5] General Atomics. TRIGA® Advantages. General Atomics Fission Energy Systems. Accessed 20 May 2026.
CR  - [6] M. T. Simnad, The U-ZrHx alloy: Its properties and use in TRIGA fuel, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 64, 403–422, 1981.
CR  - [7] D. Olander, E. Greenspan, H. D. Garkisch, and B. Petrovic, Uranium-zirconium hydride fuel properties, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 239, 1406–1424, 2009.
CR  - [8] H. Böck and M. Villa, TRIGA Reactor Characteristics, Atominstitut/IAEA Training Material, 2007.
CR  - [9] L. Snoj, et al., A half-century of nuclear research, education and training: Story of the JSI TRIGA reactor, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 214, 111122, 2025.
CR  - [10] International Atomic Energy Agency, Guidelines for Ageing Management, Modernization and Refurbishment Programmes for Research Reactors, IAEA Safety Reports Series, 2024.
CR  - [11] International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety of Research Reactors, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-3, 2016.
CR  - [12] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Guidelines for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-Power Reactors, NUREG-1537 (Part 1 and Part 2), 1996.
CR  - [13] National Research Council, Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities for Converting U.S. and Russian Research Reactors: A Workshop Report, National Academies Press, 2012.
CR  - [14] L. Snoj, Ž. Štancar, V. Radulović, T. Kaiba, I. Lengar, G. Žerovnik, et al., Benchmark experiments at the TRIGA Mark II reactor, Proceedings of PHYSOR 2016, 2016.
CR  - [15] Ž. Štancar, L. Snoj, L. Barbot, C. Destouches, J. F. Villard, A. Trkov, et al., Computational validation of the fission rate distribution experimental benchmark at the JSI TRIGA Mark II research reactor using the Monte Carlo method, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 112, 94–108, 2018.
CR  - [16] G. Žerovnik, L. Snoj, A. Trkov, L. Barbot, D. Fourmentel, and J. F. Villard, Measurements of thermal power at the TRIGA Mark II reactor in Ljubljana using multiple detectors, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 61, 2527–2531, 2014.
CR  - [17] G. Žerovnik, T. Kaiba, V. Radulović, L. Snoj, L. Barbot, D. Fourmentel, et al., Validation of the neutron and gamma fields in the JSI TRIGA reactor using in-core fission and ionization chambers, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 96, 27–35, 2015.
CR  - [18] M. A. B. C. Menezes, D. Campolina, et al., Characterization of irradiation channels in the carousel of TRIGA Mark I IPR-R1 research reactor, Brazil, aiming at the application of k0-standardization method of neutron activation analysis, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 332, 3823–3834, 2023.
CR  - [19] General Atomic. Kinetic Behavior of TRIGA Reactors. Report GA-7882. San Diego: General Atomic; 1967.
CR  - [20] International Atomic Energy Agency. Neutron Activation Analysis. IAEA Topics. Accessed 20 May 2026.
CR  - [21] International Atomic Energy Agency. Radioisotope Production in Research Reactors. IAEA Topics. Accessed 20 May 2026.
CR  - [22] C. J. Werner, et al., MCNP User's Manual, Code Version 6.2, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-17-29981, 2017.
CR  - [23] J. Leppänen, M. Pusa, T. Viitanen, V. Valtavirta, and T. Kaltiaisenaho, The Serpent Monte Carlo code: Status, development and applications in 2013, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 82, 142–150, 2015.
CR  - [24] P. K. Romano, N. E. Horelik, B. R. Herman, A. G. Nelson, B. Forget, and K. Smith, OpenMC: A state-of-the-art Monte Carlo code for research and development, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 82, 90–97, 2015.
CR  - [25] E. Bradley, P. Adelfang, and I. N. Goldman, International Atomic Energy Agency support of research reactor highly enriched uranium to low enriched uranium fuel conversion projects, IAEA Conference Paper, 2008.
CR  - [26] J. Roglans-Ribas and C. Landers, Research and Test Reactor Conversion to Low Enriched Uranium Fuel: Technical and Programmatic Progress, IAEA Technical Meeting Paper, 2012.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.59474/nuclear.2023.68
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/5591993
ER  -