TY  - JOUR
T1  - Teachers’ instructional planning as a cognitive and deliberative practice: A systematic review of research (2005–2025).
AU  - Tokgöz, Özlem
PY  - 2026
DA  - June
Y2  - 2026
DO  - 10.31704/ijocis.1918818
JF  - International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies
JO  - IJOCIS
PB  - Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Derneği
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2146-3638
SP  - 1
EP  - 31
VL  - 16
IS  - 1
LA  - en
AB  - Instructional planning is a central but theoretically dispersed domain of teacher education research. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on instructional planning published between 2005 and 2025, examining the field through the dual lens of teacher cognition and curriculum deliberation. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 statement and a theory-driven design, the review addresses three research questions concerning theoretical traditions, methodological approaches, and knowledge claims characterizing the field. 43 empirical studies were identified across five electronic databases following a staged screening process applied to 987 initially retrieved records. Each included study was coded against the seven constructs of the Teacher Thinking–Instructional Planning (TTIP) Framework. The findings point to three key patterns. First, the field is organized around a strong but relatively narrow cognition-and-decision core, with instructional decision-making (67.4%) and pedagogical reasoning (58.1%) dominating empirical attention. Second, motivational and deliberative dimensions receive limited attention, with motivational orientations (23.3%) and teacher beliefs as a primary focus (4.7%) appearing in relatively few studies. Third, the literature is largely descriptive, with 74.5% of studies producing descriptive or explanatory claims and fewer offering developmental or evaluative evidence. The evidence reviewed here positions instructional planning as a cognitively demanding, deliberative, and contextually shaped professional practice. It cannot be reduced to procedural skill. The TTIP Framework is proposed as an integrated conceptual platform for building more cumulative and explanatory research.
KW  - Instructional planning
KW  - Teacher cognition
KW  - Curriculum deliberation
KW  - Systematic review
KW  - Teacher agency
CR  - Aguas, P. P. (2020). Key stakeholders’ lived experiences while implementing an aligned curriculum: A phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report, 25(10), 3459–3485. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4237
CR  - Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
CR  - Aydın-Ceran, S., & Ergül, E. (2022). Designing a science lesson: Developing pre-service teachers’ lesson planning skills based on real-life context-based approach. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 5(2), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.35207/later.1195137
CR  - Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’ expertise on technology-enhanced lesson plan quality. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300
CR  - Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Beckmann, T., & Ehmke, T. (2023). Informal and formal lesson planning in school internships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104249
CR  - Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. SUNY Press.
CR  - Bieda, K. N., Cavanna, J. M., Ji, X., & Quander, J. R. (2020). A large-scale study of how districts’ curriculum policies shape teachers’ mathematics lesson planning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 774–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1754921
CR  - Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200005X
CR  - Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.
CR  - Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026004473
CR  - Bouguerba, T. (2025). The interplay of context-practice in intercultural education: Insights from Moroccan EFL classrooms. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2025.7.2.17
CR  - Cevikbas, M., König, J., & Rothland, M. (2024). Empirical research on teacher competence in mathematics lesson planning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01487-2
CR  - Cherbow, K., & McNeill, K. L. (2022). Planning for student-driven discussions: A revelatory case of curricular sensemaking for epistemic agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(3), 408–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.2024433
CR  - Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). Macmillan.
CR  - Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1977). Research on teacher thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(4), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1977.11075516
CR  - Contreras, J., Yáñez, S., & Villalón, R. (2020). Examining differences between pre- and in-service teachers’ cognition when lesson planning. System, 91, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102240
CR  - Dasas, L. B. (2021). Looking at curriculum implementation from an actor-oriented lens: The case of a Filipino K-12 school. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(15), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.a078
CR  - Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2006). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308576
CR  - Fives, H., & Buehl, M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
CR  - Geçici, F. (2023). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının yazma becerisine yönelik hazırladıkları ders planlarının ders işleme süreci açısından incelenmesi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 11(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.1156637
CR  - Goh, R., & Fang, Y. (2023). A tale of two schools: Curriculum deliberation and school-level orientation in transforming knowledge through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 12(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2022-0026
CR  - Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press.
CR  - Gülten, A. Z. (2013). Am I planning well? Teacher trainees’ voices on lesson planning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1409–1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.053
CR  - Hall, T. J., & Smith, M. A. (2006). Teacher planning, instruction and reflection: What we know about teacher cognitive processes. Quest, 58(4), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2006.10491892
CR  - Hatch, L., & Clark, S. K. (2021). A study of the instructional decisions and lesson planning strategies of highly effective rural elementary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103505
CR  - Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
CR  - John, P. D. (2006). Lesson planning and the student teacher: Rethinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500363620
CR  - Kablan, Z. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının ders planı hazırlama ve uygulama becerilerine bilişsel öğrenme ve somut yaşantı düzeylerinin etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(163), 239–253.
CR  - Kang, H. (2017). Preservice teachers’ learning to plan intellectually challenging tasks. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676313
CR  - Karabay, A. (2013). Eleştirel okuma-yazma eğitimi programının Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının Türkçe dersini planlama ve uygulama sürecine etkisi. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.4977
CR  - Karlström, M., & Hamza, K. (2021). How do we teach planning to pre-service teachers – A tentative model? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 664–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1875163
CR  - Kohler, F. W., Henning, J. E., & Usma-Wilches, J. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers to make instructional decisions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2108–2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.002
CR  - König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., & Glutsch, N. (2020). General pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical adaptivity in written lesson plans. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 800–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1752804
CR  - König, J., Heine, S., Jäger-Biela, D., & Rothland, M. (2024). ICT integration in teachers’ lesson plans. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 821–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2138323
CR  - König, J., Krepf, M., Bremerich-Vos, A., & Buchholtz, C. (2021). Meeting cognitive demands of lesson planning: The CODE-PLAN model. The Teacher Educator, 56(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1938324
CR  - Koni, I., & Krull, E. (2018). Differences in novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of planning activities in terms of primary instructional tasks. Teacher Development, 22(4), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1442876
CR  - Krepf, M., & König, J. (2023). Structuring the lesson: Preservice teacher decision-making during planning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 49(5), 911–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2151877
CR  - Li, W., & Zou, W. (2017). A study of EFL teacher expertise in lesson planning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015
CR  - Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
CR  - Lim, W., Son, J.-W., & Kim, D.-J. (2018). Understanding preservice teacher skills to construct lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9783-1
CR  - Lui, A. M., & Bonner, S. M. (2016). Preservice and inservice teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and instructional planning in primary school mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.015
CR  - McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary school teachers plan? The nature of planning and influences on it. Elementary School Journal, 81(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/461237
CR  - Molina, S. C. (2019). Mediating teacher candidate sense of agency in response to policy and curricula planning in a community-based adult English language program. In G. P. Glasgow & J. Bouchard (Eds.), Researching agency in language policy and planning (pp. 120–138). Routledge.
CR  - Morady Moghaddam, M., & Parsaiyan, S. F. (2025). The mediational role of ‘teacher guides’ in TESOL: Teachers’ reported practices on scaffolding, appropriation, and self-regulation. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 38(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2423757
CR  - Nagamine, T. (2025). Building teacher agency through collaborative lesson planning: Student teachers’ evaluative perspectives. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(2), 542–559. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i2.42271
CR  - Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjártsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
CR  - Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
CR  - Penuel, W. R., McWilliams, H., McAuliffe, C., Benbow, A. E., Mably, C., & Hayden, M. (2009). Teaching for understanding in Earth science: Comparing impacts on planning and instruction in three professional development designs for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9120-9
CR  - Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. Lanchester University.
CR  - Poulton, P. (2020). Teacher agency in curriculum reform: The role of assessment in enabling and constraining primary teachers’ agency. Curriculum Perspectives, 40(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00100-w
CR  - Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
CR  - Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
CR  - Sawyer, A. G., Watson, A., & Berson, M. J. (2020). Developing teachers as critical curators: Preservice teachers’ inspirations for lesson planning. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119879894
CR  - Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/442881
CR  - Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541
CR  - Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051004455
CR  - Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
CR  - Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
CR  - Şahin-Taşkın, Ç. (2017). Exploring pre-service teachers’ perceptions of lesson planning in primary education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(12), 57–63.
CR  - Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
CR  - Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
CR  - Ulusoy, F., & İncikabı, L. (2022). Preservice mathematics teachers’ selection of curriculum resources in individual and group lesson planning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(8), 2040–2058. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1958944
CR  - Valdez, P. N., Lapinid, M. R. C., & Chua, V. C. G. (2024). Agency at work: A metaphor analysis of lesson planning among English language teachers in the Philippines. TEFLIN Journal, 35(2), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v35i2/352-369
CR  - Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., & De Vries, B. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003
CR  - Walker, D. F. (1971). A naturalistic model for curriculum development. School Review, 80(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/442926
CR  - Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2017). Secondary science teachers as curriculum makers: Mapping and designing Scotland’s new Curriculum for Excellence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(3), 324–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21346
CR  - Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200407
CR  - Xu, H., & Wilkins, C. (2025). Cognitive dynamics in teacher knowledge development through lesson study: Insights from two Chinese teams. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2476289. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2476289
CR  - Yıldırım, A. (2003). Instructional planning in a centralized school system: Lessons of a study among primary school teachers in Turkey. International Review of Education, 49(5), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026361208399
CR  - Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning. Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1086/4611
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.1918818
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/5858689
ER  -