TY - JOUR TT - Social State and the Change in Public Policies of Governance State: The Cases of IV. and IX. Development Plans AU - Şahin, Yeşim Edis PY - 2016 DA - July JF - Toplum ve Demokrasi Dergisi PB - Ali KAMALAK WT - DergiPark SN - 1307-4687 SP - 57 EP - 72 VL - 3 IS - 5 KW - Sosyal devlet KW - yönetişim KW - kamu politikası KW - kalkınma planları N2 - Development plans reflect changes in state’s character and public policies because development plans are not prepared in order to change economic system but to change economy and public policies according to the needs of accumulation regime. The fourth, eight and ninth development plans have separate characteristics when they are reviewed from this perspective. The fourth five-year development plan as a last long-run plan which reflects the principles of welfare state of the florist era and public oriented public policies has a distinctive place in Turkey’s socio-economic process. The eighth five-year development plan is a typical example of the new mode of governance, however, transformation in public policies and state’s role towards capital is more pronounced in the ninth development plan. When the aforementioned development plans in the studied period are compared, it is observed that public entrepreneurship was replaced by privatization policies, basic public services such as education, health and social security were commodified, and the state’s role as an arbiter between labour and capital was abandoned. This situation shows that the new mode of governance is biased in favour of capital in shaping public policies, and workers and unemployed are left to be dependent on NGO aid programmes. CR - Almond, Gabriel A. & Powell, G. Bingham Jr., 1978, Comparative Politics: System, Process, and Policy, Little, Brown & Company, USA. CR - Alden, J. & Thomas, H., 1998, “Social Exclusion in Europe: Context and Policy”, International Planning Studies, 3 (1), s.7-13. CR - Aren, S., 1978, 100 Soruda Ekonomi El Kitabı, Gerçek Yayınevi, Genişletilmiş 6. Baskı, İstanbul. CR - Brown, J., 2002, “Yönetişim ya da Neo-liberalizmin Siyasi Düzeni”, çev. T. Gülcan, Birikim, 158, s. 36-43. CR - Clarke, S., 1992, “What in the F---’s Name is Fordism”, içinde Fordism and Flexibility, (eds.) Nigel, G., Roger, B. & Anna, P., s. 13-30, The Macmillan Press, London. CR - DPT, 1979, Dördüncü Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı (1979-1983), Yayın No: 1164, Ankara. _____, 2000, Sekizinci Beş Yıllık [http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/viii/plan8str.pdf], e.t. 11.10. 2003. Kalkınma Planı (2001-2005), _____, 2006, Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı (2007-2013), [http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/ plan9.pdf], e.t. 6.12.2006. CR - Dunleavy, P., Helen-Bastow, M. & Simon-Tinkler, J., 2005, “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, s. 1-28 CR - Farazmand, A., 2001, “Globalization, The State and Public Administration: A Theoretical Analysis With Policy Implications For Developmental States”, Public Organization Review, 1, s. 437–463. CR - Gouverneur, J., 1997, Kapitalist Ekonominin Temelleri, (çev.) Başkaya, F., İmge Kitabevi, Ankara. CR - Haque, M. S., 1996, “Public Service Under Challenge in the Age of Privatization”, Governance, 9 (2 – April), s. 186-216. CR - Newman, J., 2007, “Rethinking ‘The Public’ in Troubled Times”, Public Policy and Administration, 2-22 (1), s. 27–47 CR - Offe, C., 1981, “Some Contradictions of the Modern Welfare State”, Praxis- International, aspx/getdocument_PRAXIS.pdf], s. 219-229, Basil Blackwell Publisher, London. 1, No, April 1981, [www.ceeol.com/ CR - Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T., 1992, Reinventing Government, Eighth printing, A William Patrick Book, USA. CR - Thacher, D., & Rein, M., 2004, “Managing Value Conflict in Public Policy”, Governance, 17 (4, October), s. 457–486. Türkiye’nin Güçlü Ekonomiye Geçiş Programı, [www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/duyuru/eko_program/program.pdf], 08.06.2001. e.t. UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/toplumdd/issue//242536 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/210941 ER -