TY  - JOUR
TT  - QUOTATION And REPRODUCTION In MUSIC  As PART Of INTERTEXTUALITY
AU  - Önal, M. Ayça
PY  - 2013
DA  - June
JF  - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
JO  - JISS
PB  - Süleyman Demirel University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1304-6373
SP  - 69
EP  - 79
IS  - 17
KW  - Metinlerarasılık
KW  - Yenidenüretim
KW  - Müziklerarasılık
N2  - When Julia Kristeva spoke of the notion of intertextuality in the 1960s, these transactions between artistic forms were based on theoretical basis. Formal intertextuality is seen when a composer directly takes the distinctive feature of a work without relating it to another work in that style. A work of art with formal intertextuality gains more meaning when it intentionally refers to certain former work(s). This process of production has many techniques such as quotation, take structural models and diversification. The aim of intertextual analysis in study is the fact that formal references reveal many ways of contributing to the meanings of the new work of art. In this respect, samples have been investigated in this study with the aim of identifying the extent to which intertextuality may enrich a musical work. It has been concluded that the songs formed by using the intertextual methods present a multilayered structure by linking the past to the present. The findings of the analysis, investigated through the method of content analysis, have been examined in the context of the notions of ‘intertextuality’ and ‘reproduction’. The works of music investigated within the framework of these notions reveal a process of transaction of intermusicality.
CR  - ADAİR, G. (1994), “Postmodernci Kapıyı İki Kere Çalar”, Çev. Dikbaş N.İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul
CR  - AKTULUM, K. (2000), “Metinlerarası İlişkiler”, Öteki Yayınları, Ankara
CR  - AKTULUM, K. (2011), “Metinlerarasılık/ Göstergelerarasılık”, Kanguru Yayınları, Ankara
CR  - CHEVASSUS, B. R. (1998), “Musique et postmodernite”, Presses Universitaires de France, (Çev. Usmanbaş, İ. (2002), “Müzikte Postmodernlik”, Pan Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
CR  - DOLTAŞ, D. (1991), “Postmodernizmin Getirdikleri ve Götürdükleri”, Çağdaş Düşünce ve Sanat, İstanbul.
CR  - HUYSSEN, A. (1994), “Postmodernin Haritasını Yapmak”, Çev. Küçük, M. (1994), “Modernite versus Postmodernite”, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.
CR  - İPŞİROĞLU, N. (2002), “20. Yüzyıl Sanatında J.S. Bach”, Pan Yayıncılık, İstanbul
CR  - RORTY, R. (1994), “Habermas, Lyotard and Postmodernite”, Çev. Küçük, M., Modernite versus Postmodernite, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara.
CR  - ROSENAU, P. M. (1998), “Postmodernizm ve Toplum Bilimleri”, Çev. Birkan, T. Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları, Ankara.
CR  - SARUP, M. (1995), “Post-Yapısalcılık ve Postmodernizm”, Çev. Güçlü, A. B., Arkadaş Yayınevi, Ankara.
CR  - SPICER, M. (2009), “Strategic Intertextuality in Three of John Lennon’s Late Beatles Songs”, Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic, Vol. 2: Iss. 1, Article 11.
CR  - TATLI, O. (2013), “Postmodernizmde Metinlerarasılık ve Pastiş”, www. osmantatli.com.tr, 2013
CR  - ÜNAL, B. (2004), “Postmodern Perspektifte Müzik Videoları ve Nez'in Sakın Ha Videosunun Analizi”, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sbe/article/248049
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/215778
ER  -