@article{article_287293, title={Kinematic comparison between single and double-leg jump landings in sagittal plane for male hand ball players}, journal={Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise}, volume={18}, pages={108–115}, year={2016}, author={Ameer, Mariam A.}, keywords={Handball players,high-risk movements,leg-jump landing}, abstract={<p class="MsoNormalCxSpFirst" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm;mso-add-space:auto;text-align:justify; line-height:normal"> <span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Double and single leg jump (SL) landing activities are considered stressful tasks for handball players. Most of the previous researches focused on kinetic analysis of these activities rather than kinematic analysis. Also, there is a lack of comparative studies that were performed between the two types of activities. The main aim of this study is to perform lower extremity kinematic analysis to find the kinematic differences between si <a name="_GoBack"> </a>ngle and double-leg jump (DL) landings in the sagittal plane (SP),in male handball players. The lower extremity kinematics were measured in 15elite male handball players(while performing SL and DL landings), by using three-dimensional motion analysis system (VICON). The results revealed statistically significant difference between the lower limb kinematics of SP <sub>SL </sub> and SP <sub>DL </sub>. During the SP <sub>DL, </sub>the hip and knee flexion angles increased more than those in SP <sub>SL </sub>, while there was more knee adduction with internal rotation stress in SP <sub>SL </sub>than in SP <sub>DL </sub>( <i>P </i>< .05). The hip and knee flexion angles in the SP <sub>DL </sub> showed moderate association with those during the SP <sub>SL </sub>( <i>R <sup>2 </sup> </i>, 0.49 and 0.44 respectively). In addition, the hip abduction in the SP <sub>DL </sub> showed moderate association with those during the SP <sub>SL </sub> ( <i>R <sup>2 </sup> </i>, 0.37). But, </span> <span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman""> hip internal rotation, knee adduction, and knee internal rotation </span> <span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">in the SP <sub>DL </sub> showed weak association with those during the SP <sub>SL </sub> </span> <span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">(R <sup>2 </sup>= 0.02-0.041; P </span> <span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">˃ </span> <span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman""> .05). </span> <span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">The double-leg jump landing maybe considered as a less stressful task for the lower limb joints than the single-leg jump landing activity. As a clinical benefit, the double-leg jump landing activity may be used to screen the ACL injury risk in certain planes of joint motion. <o:p> </o:p> </span> </p>}, number={3}, publisher={Selcuk University}