TY - JOUR TT - Building Material Production from Fly Ash, Lime and Gypsum AU - Yüksek, Salih AU - Kaya, Semih PY - 2017 DA - October DO - 10.21541/apjes.292066 JF - Academic Platform - Journal of Engineering and Science JO - APJES PB - Akademik Perspektif Derneği WT - DergiPark SN - 2147-4575 SP - 58 EP - 70 VL - 5 IS - 3 KW - Baca külü KW - Jips KW - Kireç N2 - Approximately 80 per cent and 20 per cent of thetotal solid waste resulting from the burning of lignite coal in thermal powerplants are fly ash and bottom ash, respectively. This material is stored innatural terrain. In order to generate 1 kWh of power approximately 110 grams ofash is produced and a thermal power plant of 1000 MW capacity produces some 650000 tons of ash on a yearly basis. About 20,000 MW of electricity is generated annually from thermal powerplants operating in our country, resulting in 13 million tons of ash. Some 400 thousand tons of ash per year is being produced inSivas-Kangal thermal power plant of 457 MW installed capacity. This material isnot considered in any way. Sivas basin contains billions of tons of gypsumresources. In this study, production of lightweight building material wasinvestigated experimentally by mixing different ratios of gypsum and lime withthe Kangal thermal power plant fly ash. Required tests were carried out inaccordance with relevant standards. It has been determined thatD-17 labeled mass 70% plaster, 10% fly ash and 20% of the mixture have moreoptimal values ​​than the other mixtures. With the addition of differentadditives to the sample series labeled D-17, the pressure resistance increasedfrom 92,8 kg / cm² to 113,8 kg / cm², while the water absorption ratios werereduced from 45,8% to 19,1% and to 6,9% with the addition of water repellent.It was found that there is an exponential relationship between Shore hardnessvalue and bending strength (R2 = 0,81) that all samples have a highcorrelation (R2 = 0.95) linear relationship between density andbending strength. CR - 1. Türker P. Erdoğan B. Katnaş F. Yeğinobalı A. 2009 Türkiye’deki uçucu küllerin sınıflandırılması ve özellikleri, TÇMB / AR-GE / Y03.03, Ankara, 112 s. CR - 2. Kızgut S. Çuhadaroğlu D. Çolak K. Çatalağzı termik santralı uçucu küllerinden tuğla üretim olanaklarının araştırılması, Türkiye 17. Uluslararası Madencilik Kongresi ve Sergisi-TUMAKS 2001, © 2001, ISBN 975-395-416-6. CR - 3. Bentli İ. Uyanık A.O. Demir U. Şahbaz O. Çelik M.S. Seyitömer termik santrali uçucu küllerinin tuğla katkı hammaddesi olarak kullanımı, Türkiye 17. Uluslararası Madencilik Kongresi ve Sergisi-TUMAKS 2001, © 2001, ISBN 975-395-416-6. CR - 4. Kumar S. 2002 A perspective study fly ash-lime-gypsum bricks and hollow blocks for low cost housing development, Department of Civil Engineering, Harcourt Butter Technological Institute, Kanpur 208002, India. CR - 5. Atiş C.D. Gorur E.B. Karahan O. Bilim C. İlkentapar S. Luga E. 2015 Very high strength (120 MPa) class F fly ash geopolymer mortar activated at different NaOH amount, heat curing temperature and heat curing duration, Constructıon And Building Materials, vol.96, pp.673-678. CR - 6. Naganathan S. Mohamed A.Y.O. Mustapha K.N. 2015 Performance of bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash, Construction and Building Materials, Volume 96, Pages 576–580. CR - 7. Consoli N.C. Rocha C.G. Saldanha R.B. 2014 Coal fly ash–carbide lime bricks: An environment friendly building product, Construction and Building Materials 69 Pages 301–309. CR - 8. Cultrone G. Sebastián E. 2009 Fly ash addition in clayey materials to improve the quality of solid bricks, Construction and Building Materials 23 Pages 1178–1184. CR - 9. Şengül Ü. 2002 Kangal termik santralinde uçucu kül atımının çevresel etkileri, ÇEVKOR, Cilt11 Sayı 44, 21-24s. CR - 10. Şengül, Ü. ve Güler, R., 2001, Kangal Termik Santrali Küllerinin Çimento Katkı Maddesi Olarak Kullanılabilirliği, C.Ü. Fen Edebiyat Fak. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 22-1/2001, Sivas. UR - https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.292066 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/347846 ER -