TY - JOUR T1 - Yatarak fizyoterapi alan hastaların yaşam kaliteleri ve maliyet analizi AU - Aktaş, İlknur AU - Kaptanoğlu Yıldırım, Ayşegül AU - Ünlü Özkan, Feyza AU - Yılmaz Kaysın, Meryem AU - Şilte, Ayşe PY - 2015 DA - October JF - Marmara Medical Journal JO - Marmara Med J PB - Marmara University WT - DergiPark SN - 1019-1941 SP - 34 EP - 38 VL - 26 IS - 1 LA - tr AB - Amaç: Lokomotor sistem sorunları nedeniyle yatarak fizyoterapi alan hastaların yaşam kaliteleri ve maliyet analizlerini ortaya koymaktır. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Yatarak fizyoterapi alan olguların demografik verileri kaydedildi ve 15 D yaşam kalite sorgulaması yapıldı. Maliyetleri hesaplandı. Yaşam kalitesi ölçeği verilerini kullanarak hesaplanan, kaliteye ayarlanmış yaşam yılı (KAYY) sayısını kullanarak ekonomik analiz yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Doksan üç olgunun 75’i (%80,64) kadın, 18’i (%19,35) erkek ve yaş ortalaması 61,45±14,52 idi. Gonartroz, hemipleji, lomber disk herni, Gullian Barre sendromu, omuzun sıkışma sendromu, lomber spondiloz, servikal disk hernisi olan hastaların yaşam kalitesi diğer gruplara göre anlamlı düzeyde düşük bulunmuştur (F=5,89; p<0,05). Gonartroz, hemipleji, lomber disk herni gruplarında tedavi için yapılan harcamalar yaşam kalitesini anlamlı düzeyde artırmaktadır (F=34,12; p<0,05). Sonuç: Gonartroz, hemipleji, lomber disk hernisi, yaşam kalitesini en çok bozan hastalıklardır. Bu hastalıklarda tedavi için yapılan harcalamalar yaşam kalitelerini anlamlı düzeyde arttırmaktadır. KW - Fizyoterapi KW - Maliyet analizi KW - Yaşam kalitesi N2 - Objectives: To reveal the quality of life of hospitalized patients with problems of the locomotor system who have received physical therapy, and provide a cost analysis. Patients and Method: Demographic data were recorded for patients who received physical therapy. Health­related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed by 15­dimensional standardized instrument (15D). The cost was calculated. An economic analysis was made to consider data from HRQoL and quality adjusted life year (QALY) scales.Result: Of ninety three patients, 75 were female (80.64%), 18 were male (19.35%) and the average age was 61.45±14.52. The quality of life was low for the patients with gonarthrosis, hemiplegia, lumbar disc herniation, Guillain­ Barré syndrome, subacromial impingement syndrome, lumbar spondylosis, cervical disc herniation when compared with the patients with other locomotor system problems treated by physical therapy (F=5.89; p CR - 1. Yıldırım-Kaptanoğlu A. Sağlık ekonomisi. Yıldırım-Kaptanoğlu A, editör. Sağlık Yönetimi 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Beşir Kitabevi, 2011; 2668. CR - 2. Ham C. Priority setting in health care. Learning from international experience. Health Policy 1997;42:49-66. doi:10.1016/S01688510(97)00054-7 CR - 3. Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL. The quality of life scale (QOLS): Reliability, validity and utilization. HQLO 2003; 23: 1-60. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-60 CR - 4. Drummond MF. Basic types of economic evaluation. In:Drummond M F, Stoddart G L, Torrance G W , editors. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987:15-7. CR - 5. The WHOQOL Group. The development of the World Health Organisation quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W, editors. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer,1994: 41-57. CR - 6. Laas K, Roine R, Räsänen P, Sintonen H, Leirisalo-Repo M; HUS QoL Study Group. Health-related quality of life in patients with common rheumatic diseases referred to a university clinic. Rheumatol Int 2009; 29: 267-73. doi: 10.1007/s00296-008-0673-x CR - 7. Yfantopoulos J. Validation and measurement of quality of life in Greece using EQ-15D. Arch Hell Med 2001;18:279-87. CR - 8. Sintonen H. The 15D measure of health-related quality of life. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation. Working Paper 41. Melbourne, Australia: Heidelberg Publication, 1994. CR - 9. Sintonen H, Pekurinen M. A fifteen dimensional measure of healthrelated quality of life (15D) and its applications. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM, editors. Quality of Life Assessment. Key Issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 1993: 185-95, 467-70. CR - 10. Akinci F, Yildirim A, Ogutman B, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation, initial reliability, and validation of Turkish 15D’s version: a generic health-related quality of life(HRQoL) instrument. Eval Health Prof 2005;28:53-66. doi: 10.1177/0163278704273078 CR - 11. Emanuel EJ. Where are the health care cost savings? JAMA 2012;307:39-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1927 CR - 12. Dalal AA, Shah M, Lunacsek O, Hanania NA. Clinical and economic burden of depression/anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients within a managed care population. COPD 2011;8:293-9. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.586659. Epub 2011 Aug. CR - 13. Theodore K. Chronic non-communicable diseases and the economy. West Indian Med J 2011;60:392-6. CR - 14. Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005;43:736–49. CR - 15. Shepard DS, Hodgkin D, Antony Y. Analysis of hospital cost: a manuel for managers. Geneva. World Health Organisation 2000. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2000/9241545283.pdf. CR - 16. Bookwala J, Jacobs J. Age, marital processes, and depressed affect. Gerontologist. 2004; 44:328-38. CR - 17. Bookwala J. Marital quality as a moderator of the effects of poor vision on quality of life among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2011;66:605-16. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr091 UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/marumj/article/3191 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2629 ER -