TY - JOUR TT - WATCH THEIR LANGUAGE: FEEDBACK PROVISION VIA AUDIO-VISUAL RECORDINGS AU - Terriche, Abdallah Amin PY - 2017 DA - August DO - 10.18768/ijaedu.336268 JF - IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education JO - IJAEDU PB - OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research WT - DergiPark SN - 2411-1821 SP - 329 EP - 333 VL - 3 IS - 8 KW - audiovisual-based corrective feedback KW - corrective feedback KW - oral errors feedback N2 - In their attempt to learn a foreign language, learners make errors. Providinga feedback on this erroneous language output presents a multilevel dilemma.First, teachers must decide whether or not to respond. Second, if feedback isever desperately required, who should do it and how should it be done? Moreimportant, overwhelmed by the sheer number of beginner and intermediate-levellearners’ errors, keeping a record and making notes of the important errorsduring interpersonal conversation such as role plays poses a serious challenge.Equally important, teachers are more inclined to interrupt constantly the flowof learners’ conversation to provide corrective feedback, a practice that muchdampens their enthusiasm to express themselves. In response, the current paperaddresses two main questions: which teaching technique could teachers devise toorganize their corrective feedback provision? Which technology toolkit could be brought into classroom use to helporganize corrective feedback provision to learners’ oral flawed output? The paperdraws on the experimental use of audiovisual recordings of learners’ oraloutput for the purpose of providing more adequate corrective feedback. With oneobjective in mind, the experiment is aimed to test the utility of usingaudiovisual recording to improve the quality of corrective feedback provision.Audiovisual recordings provide useful database for teachers to organize anyremedial intervention and feedback provision. Moreover, the recordings will, inthe long term, constitute a corpus that could be well exploited to build anexplanatory theory for learners’ errors. CR - Bailey, K. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching. Speaking. New York (NY): McGraw Hill. Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (1980). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. New York (NY): Routledge. Cruickshank, D., Jenkins, D. B., & Metcalf, K. K. The Act of Teaching. USA: McGraw-Hill College. Douglass, H. B. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York (NY): Longman. Douglass Brown, H. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York (NY): Longman. Guillot, M. N. (1999). Fluency and its Teaching. Great Britain: Multilingual Matters. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Littlewood, W. (1998). Foreign and Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nation, P. (1989). Improving Speaking Fluency. System, 17 (3), 377-384. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/1989-Fluency.pdf Pollard, L. (2008). Lucy Pollard’s Guide to Teaching English. USA. Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rivers, W., & Temperley, M. S. (1978). A Practical Guide to the Teaching of English as a Second or Foreign Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Venkateswaran, S. (1995). Principles of Teaching English. New Delhi: VIKAS Publishing House. UR - https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.336268 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/337967 ER -