TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Uses of Anachronism in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida
TT  - The Uses of Anachronism in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida
AU  - Doğan Adanur, Evrim
PY  - 2017
DA  - November
Y2  - 2017
DO  - 10.21547/jss.341889
JF  - Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
JO  - GAUN-JSS
PB  - Gaziantep University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1303-0094
SP  - 1048
EP  - 1056
VL  - 16
IS  - 4
LA  - en
AB  - WilliamShakespeare is one of the greatest anachronists. Together with all the historicalinaccuracies for the sake of dramatic effect, he also uses intentional,unintentional, and “necessary” anachronisms in his plays. While writing his versionof the “Homeric” tale of the Trojan War, Shakespeare brings together thecontroversies of the rampantly changing early modern world from a feudal to acapitalist one in Troilus and Cressida.In a tale stemming from the antiquity and transformed, even reproduced duringthe medieval age through the romance tradition, Shakespeare juxtaposes the“old” and the “new” in his handling of the medieval/feudal Trojans and early modern/capitalistGreeks. The “chivalric” medieval age finds its representation especially inTrojan Hector and the “modern” in Greek Ulysses. This paper examines the waysin which the past and the present are correlated in Troilus and Cressida and the “chronos” is transformed into “kairos”with the juxtaposition of contemporary ideologies in a seemingly Homeric world.
KW  - Shakespeare
KW  - Troilus and Cressida
KW  - anachronism
KW  - kairos
N2  - William Shakespeare en önemli anakronistlerdendir. Oyunlarında, dramatikamaçlı yaptığı tarihsel yanlışlıkların yanı sıra bilinçli, bilinçsiz ve“gerekli” kronik hatalar görülmektedir. Troilusve Cressida oyununda Shakespeare, Truva savaşının kendi Homerik hikayesiniyazarken de hızla feodalden kapitaliste dönüşen erken modern çağın tartışmalarınıbir araya getirmektedir. Antik çağa ait olan ve orta çağ boyunca romansgeleneği ile değişen hatta yeniden yazılan hikayede Shakespeare “eski” ve“yeni”yi orta çağa ait/feudal Truvalılar ve erken modern çağa ait/kapitalistYunanlıların temsilleriyle yan yana sunmaktadır. Oyunda orta çağın “şövalyelik”özelliği Truvalı Hector’da, “modern”e ait özellikler de Yunan Ulysses üzerindentemsil edilmektedir. Bu makalede Troilusve Cressida oyununda geçmiş ve şimdiki zamanın nasıl yoğrulduğu ve çağdaşideolojilerin güya Homerik bir dünyada bir araya getirilmesiyle “kronos”unnasıl “kairos”a dönüştüğünü incelenmektedir.
CR  - anachronism. (n.d.). Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/anachronism
CR  - anachronism. (n.d.). Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/anachronism
CR  - Burke Peter (1997). The Renaissance. New York: Macmillan.
CR  - --- (2001). “The Sense of Anachronism from Petrarch to Poussin.” Time in the Medieval World. Eds. Chris Humphrey and W. M Ormrod. Suffolk: York Medieval Press. 157-176
CR  - Garber, Marjorie (2008). Profiling Shakespeare. New York: Routledge.
CR  - Frye, Northrop (1993). The Myth of Deliverance: Reflections on Shakespeare’s Problem Comedies. Toronto: U of Toronto P.
CR  - Greenblatt, Stephen (1998). “Murdering Peasants: Status, Genre, and the Representations of Rebellion” Representing the English Renaissance. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California P. pp. 1-31
CR  - --- (2005). Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. London: Pimlico.
CR  - Kaufmann, R.J. (1965). “Ceremonies for Chaos; The Status of Troilus and Cressida.” ELH, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 139–59.
CR  - Kermode Frank (2000). The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford UP.
CR  - Lukács Georg (1989). The Historical Novel. Trans. Hannah and Stanley Mitchell. London: Merlin Press.
CR  - Muir, Kenneth (2003). “Troilus and Cressida.” The Cambridge Shakespeare Library: Shakespeare Criticism, edited by Catherine M.S. Alexander, vol. 2, Cambridge UP, Cambridge, pp. 423–432.
CR  - Panofski, Erwin (1972). Studies in Iconography: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. Boulder, Colorado: Icon.
CR  - Potter, A. M. (1988). “Troilus and Cressida: Deconstructing the Middle Ages?” Theoria 72: pp. 23-35.
CR  - Rossiter, A.P. (1976). “Troilus as ‘Inquisition’.” Troilus and Cressida: A Selection of Critical Essays. Ed. P. Martin. London: Macmillan, pp. 100-121
CR  - Shakespeare, William. Hamlet (1997). The Riverside Shakespeare. Eds. Herschel Baker, et. al. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 1183-1245
CR  - --- (2003). Troilus and Cressida. Ed. Anthony B. Dawson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.341889
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/359755
ER  -