TY  - JOUR
TT  - Tuğla Dolgu Duvarların B/A Çerçeveli Yapıların Davranışına Etkilerinin İncelenmesi; Deneysel ve Kuramsal Çalışmalar
AU  - Sevil, Tuğçe
AU  - Baran, Mehmet
AU  - Canbay, Erdem
PY  - 2010
DA  - June
JF  - International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
JO  - IJERAD
PB  - Kirikkale University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1308-5506
SP  - 35
EP  - 42
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
KW  - Betonarme çerçeveli yapı
KW  - tuğla dolgu
KW  - taşıyıcı olmayan eleman
KW  - dayanım
KW  - rijitlik
KW  - zati yük
KW  - tersinirtekrarlanır yatay yük
N2  - In Turkey, the use of hollow brick infills as partition walls in reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings is widely used in practice. Although hollow brick infills are considered to be non-structural members, experimental studies conducted for years and investigations made on the structures after the earthquakes occured in Turkey revealed that hollow brick infills have favorable effects on the strength and stiffness of the structures. According to the Turkish Earthquake Code (2007) [1], hollow brick infills are taken into account only at the calculation of the total dead load, however they do not affect the structural characteristics of the building. In this study, one-bay, two story reinforced concrete frames, constructed at the Structural Mechanics Laboratory of Middle East Technical University, were tested under both vertical and reversed-cyclic lateral loads simulating the earthquake loads, and the effect of non-plastered and plastered hollow brick infills on the strength and stiffness of the RC frames were investigated. The results of the analytical studies conducted were compared with the results of the tests. Suggestions for modeling of the plastered hollow brick infills during the structural design process were given.
CR  - [1] T.C. Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı (2007), “Deprem Bölgelerinde
Yapılacak Binalar Hakkında Esaslar, Ankara.
[2] Kaplan, S., A., “Dolgu Duvarların Betonarme Taşıyıcı Sistem
Performansına Etkisi”, Türkiye Mühendislik Haberleri, Sayı:452 – 2008/6.
[3] Sevil, T., “Seismic Strengthening of Masonry Infilled R/C Frames with
Steel Fiber Reinforcement”, Doktora Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi,
Ankara, 2010.
[4] Polyakov, S. V., “Masonry in Framed Buildings; An Investigation into the
Strength and Stiffness of Masonry Infilling” (English Translation),
Moscow, 1957.
[5] Smith, B. S., “Model Test Results of Vertical and Horizontal Loading of
Infilled Specimens”, ACI Journal, August 1968, pp. 618-624.
[6] Smith, B., S., “Lateral Stiffness of Infilled Frames”, ASCE Journal of
Structural Division, Vol. 88, ST. 6, December 1962, pp.183-199.
[7] Smith, B., S., “Behaviour of Square Infilled Frames”, ASCE Journal of
Structural Division, Vol. 92, ST. 1, February 1966.
[8] Smith, ., S., “Methods for Predicting the Lateral Stiffness and Strength of
Multi-Storey Infilled Frames”, Building Science, Vol. 2, 1967, pp. 247-
257.
[9] Smith, B., S., Carter, C., “A Method of Analysis for Infilled Frames”, Proc.
ICE, Vol. 44, September 1969, pp. 31-48.
[10] Mainstone, R. J., Weeks, G. A., The influence of bounding frame on the
racking stiffness and strength of brick walls,” 2nd International
BrickMasonry Conference, Watford, England, 12-15 April 1970, 165-171.
[11] Mainstone, R. J., “Suplementary Note on the Stifness and Strengths of
Infilled Frames” Current Paper 13/74, Building Research Station, UK,
February 1974.
[12] Klingner, R. E., Bertero, V., “Earthquake Resistance of Infilled Frames”,
Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, June 1978.
[13] Paulay, T., Priestley, MJN., “Seismic design of reinforced concrete and
masonry buildings”, New York, John Wiley, 1992.
[14] Angel, R., Abrams, D.P., Shapiro, D., Uzarski, J., and Webster, M.,
“Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Infills,” Structural
Research Series No.589, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
UILU ENG 94-2005, March 1994, 183 pp.
[15] Ghassan Al-Chaar, Evaluating Strength and Stiffness of Unreinforced
Masonry Infill Structures, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory,
January 2002.
[16] Saneinejad, A., Hobbs, B., “Inelastic Design of Infilled Frames”, Journal of
Structural Engineering, 121(4), 634-650.
[17] El-Dakhakhni, W., W., Elgaaly, M., Hamid, A., A., “Three-Strut Model for
Concrete Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames”, Journal of Structural
Engineering, February 2003, 177-185.
[18] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), EVALUATION OF
EARTHQUAKE DAMAGED CONCRETE AND MASONRY WALL
BUILDINGS, FEMA 306, 1998.
[19] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), NEHRP
GUIDELINES FOR THE SEISMIC REHABILITATION OF
BUILDINGS, FEMA 356, November 2000.
[20] Baran, M., Canbay, E., Tankut, T., “Beton Panellerle Güçlendirme –
Kuramsal Yaklaşım”, İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası, Teknik Dergi, Cilt 21,
No.1, 4959-4978, Ocak 2010.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/umagd/issue//345723
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/353309
ER  -