TY  - JOUR
TT  - EVALUATION OF ELECTRIC FAILURE ANALYSIS IN THE FRAMEWORK OFMULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHOD
AU  - Eraslan, Ümmü Gülsüm
AU  - Balo, Figen
AU  - Uçar, Ukbe Usame
AU  - Çetin, Büşra
PY  - 2018
DA  - January
DO  - 10.18092/ulikidince.353994
JF  - Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi
JO  - IJEAS
PB  - Kenan ÇELİK
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1307-9832
SP  - 135
EP  - 146
KW  - Elektrik
KW  - Arıza
N2  - TEDAS'sprivatization process is carried out by private distribution companies in 21regions in Turkey. These companies are responsible for all malfunctions in thearea concerned, and there is a large amount of staff to take these malfunctionsas soon as possible. The cost of personnel and costs caused by defects are agreat burden to the company, and defects that occur at the same time can havenegative effects on people's quality of life. As a result of the analysis, themain and sub factors causing electrical failures were determined and it wasaimed to direct the technical teams according to the failure type quickly bydetermining the order of priority among failures. Within the scope of thisstudy, the faults recorded in Elazığ province in the last one year have beenexamined and analyzed. The central tendency and distribution measures were usedin the interpretation of the records, and the fish hatch diagram was used inthe determination and classification of the causes of the failures. In theprioritization of faults, a multi-criteria decision making method was utilizedby using the Expert Choice program. As a result, attempts have been made toidentify the causes of electrical failures and to prioritize them so as toreduce the number of failures and the resulting costs. Thus, it is anticipatedthat an uninterrupted flow of electricity will be provided and the costsincurred will be reduced.
CR  - Adıgüzel, O. (2009) “Personel Seçiminin Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Yöntemiyle Gerçekleştirilmesi”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24:243-251.
CR  - Akdeniz, H. A., & Turgutlu, T. (2007). Türkiye’de perakende sektöründe analitik hiyerarşik süreç yaklaşımıyla tedarikçi performans değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 1-17.
CR  - Arslan, A. G. E. T. (2010). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Yöntemiyle Strateji Seçimi: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesinde Bir Uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2).
CR  - Aydın, Ö., ÖZNEHİR, S., & Akcalı, E. (2009). Ankara için optimal hastane yeri seçiminin Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile modellenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2).
CR  - Barker, T. J. ve Zabinsky, Z. B. (2011) “A Multicriteria Decision Making Model for Reverse Logistics Using Analytical Hierarchy Process”, Omega, 39(5):558-573.
Chen, L. S. ve Cheng, C. H. (2005) “Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on Metric Distance Method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 160(3):803–820.
CR  - Cheng, Eddie W.L., v.d. “Analytic Hierarchy Process, A Defective Toll When Used Improperly”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 6, No.4, ABI/FORM Global.
CR  - Dündar, S. (2008). Ders seçiminde analitik hiyerarşi proses uygulaması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2).
CR  - EmeL, G. ve EmeL, E., (1998), “İsletmelerde Pazar Gücünün Belirlenmesinde Çok Kriterli Bir Yaklasım”, Verimlilik Dergisi, Milli Produktivite Merkezi Yayını, Ankara.
CR  - Forman, E. ve Selly M. A. (2000), Decision by Objectives, Expert Choice Inc. Pittsburgh.
CR  - Gibney, R. ve Shang, J. (2007) “Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46:1030–1040.
CR  - Güngör, İ., & İşler, D. B. (2012). Analitik hiyerarşi yaklaşımı ile otomobil seçimi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 1(2), 21-33.
CR  - Lai, V., Wong, B.K. ve Cheung, W. (2002) “Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in the software selection”, European Journal of Operational Research, 137(1):134–144.
CR  - Murat, G., & Çelik, N. (2012). Analitik hiyerarşi süreci yöntemi ile otel işletmelerinde hizmet kalitesini değerlendirme: Bartın örneği. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 3(6), 1-20.
CR  - Özbek, A. ve Eren, T. (2012) “Selecting the Third Party Logistic(3PL) Firm through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 4(2):46-54.
CR  - Saaty, T. L. (1980) “The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
CR  - Saaty, T. L. (1994) “Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With The Analytical        Hierarchy Process”, RWS Publ. Pittsburg.
CR  - Saaty, T.L. ve Vargas, L. G., (2001), Models, Methods, Concept and Applications of The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
CR  - Ünal, Ö. F. (2010) “Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi İle Yetkinlik Bazlı İnsan Kaynakları Yöneticisi Seçimi”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Isparta, S.D.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
CR  - Vega, P., Peter S., Salmeron-Ochoa, I., la Hidalga, A. Nieva-de ve Sharratt, P.N. (2011) “Analytical hierarchy processes (AHP) for the selection of solvents in early stages of pharmaceutical process development”, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 89(4):261-267.
CR  - Yılmaz, N., (2000), “Analitik Hiyerarsi Yaklasımı”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
CR  - Zionts, Stanley (1989), “Multi Criteria Mathematical Programming: An Updated Overview and Several Approaches”, Multi Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Micro Computers, NATO ASI Series Vol. F56.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.353994
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/405737
ER  -