TY  - JOUR
T1  - Learning Strategies Predicting the Perception of Social Presence of Distance Education Students
TT  - Uzaktan Eğitim Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Bulunuşluk Algılarını Yordayan Öğrenme Stratejileri
AU  - Kılıç Çakmak, Ebru
AU  - Olpak, Yusuf Ziya
PY  - 2018
DA  - February
DO  - 10.14686/buefad.365218
JF  - Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education
JO  - BUEFAD
PB  - Bartin University
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1308-7177
SP  - 276
EP  - 295
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
LA  - en
AB  - This research has beenplanned for presenting the relations between the social presence andself-regulation in e-learning process which is very important for distanceeducation students. In this respect, it is tried to determined the learningstrategies which predict the social presence perceptions of the students. Theresearch which is carried out according to the survey model, is actualize withthe data obtained from 61 students giving appropriate answers to the questionsin data collection tools. In collecting the data; motivated strategies forlearning questionnaire, social presence scale and personal information formwhich is developed by the authors, has been used. In analyzing the data;descriptive statistics, stepwise regression analysis and one way ANOVA areused. Study results shows that e-learners perceived co-presence could bepredicted with two variables; organization and help seeking, e-learnersperceived influence could be predicted with three variables; organization, helpseeking and effort regulation, e-learners perceived cohesiveness could bepredicted with three variables; help seeking, organization and effortregulation, and e-learners perceived social presence could be predicted withthree variables; organization, help seeking and effort regulation. Besides, thesocial presence perception of the students, do not show a significantdifference according to the gender, class level and department variables.
KW  - Social presence
KW  - Co-presence
KW  - Influence
KW  - Cohesiveness
KW  - Learning strategies
N2  - Bu araştırma uzaktan eğitimöğrencileri için oldukça önemli olan sosyal bulunuşluk ve öz-düzenlemenine-öğrenme sürecinde bir biri ile ilişkisini ortaya koymak amacıylaplanlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda öğrencilerin sosyal bulunuşluk algılarını yordayanöğrenme stratejileri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Tarama modeline göre yürütülenaraştırma, kullanılan veri toplama araçlarındaki sorulara uygun şekildeyanıtlar veren 61 öğrenciden elde edilen veriler ile gerçekleştirilmiştir.Verilerin toplanmasında; güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeği, sosyalbulunuşluk ölçeği ve yazarlar tarafından geliştirilen kişisel bilgi formukullanılmıştır. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde ise; betimsel istatistikler, adımsal regresyon analizi ve ilişkisiz örneklemler için tek faktörlü varyans analizikullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları öğrencilerin ortak bulunuşluk algılarının; düzenlemeve yardım isteme ile, etkileme algılarının; düzenleme, yardım isteme ve emekyönetimi ile, kaynaştırma algılarının; yardım isteme, düzenleme ve emekyönetimi ile ve son olarak sosyal bulunuşluk algılarının ise; düzenleme, yardımisteme ve emek yönetimi ile yordanabileceğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca öğrencilerinsosyal bulunuşluk algıları; cinsiyet, sınıf ve bölüm değişkenlerine göreanlamlı bir farklılık göstermemiştir.
CR  - Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1995). Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. Higher Education, 29(2), 183–199.
CR  - Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207–239.
CR  - Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 191-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
CR  - Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(4), 287–303.
CR  - Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1).
CR  - Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. Rogers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (2nd ed., pp. 352–360). IGI Global.
CR  - Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
CR  - Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc..
CR  - Henri, F., & Rigault, C. R. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In In Advanced Educational Technology: Research Issues and Future Potential (pp. 45–76). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
CR  - Holmberg, B. (1991). The feasibility of a predictive theory of distance education: What are we allowed to expect. In B. Holmberg & G.Ortner (Eds.), Research Into Distance Education.
CR  - Kang, M., Choi, H., & Park, S. (2007). Construction and validation of a social presence scale for measuring online learners’ involvement. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2007(1), 1829–1833.
CR  - Katz, Y. J. (2000). The comparative suitability of three ICT distance learning methodologies for college level instruction. Educational Media International, 57(1), 25–30.
CR  - Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520.
CR  - Lehman, R. M., & Conceição, S. C. O. (2010). Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: How to“ be there” for distance learners. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
CR  - Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2010). From pixel on a screen to real person in your students’ lives: Establishing social presence using digital storytelling. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 70–72.
CR  - Lu, Y., Huang, W., Ma, H., & Luce, T. (2007). Interaction and social presence in technology-mediated learning: A partial least squares model. In In Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on (pp. 4411-4414). IEEE.
CR  - Montalvo, F. T., & Torres, M. C. G. (2004). Self-regulated learning: Current and future directions. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1), 1–34.
CR  - Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 20–35). Routledge.
CR  - Moore, M. G., & Anderson, W. G. (2003). Handbook of distance education. Routledge.
CR  - Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning, 3rd ed.: A Systems View of Online Learning. Toronto:Wadsworth.
CR  - Olpak, Y. Z., & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2009). E-öğrenme ortamları için sosyal bulunuşluk ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 142–160.
CR  - Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston. Heinle & Heinle Publishing.
CR  - Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding self-regulated learning (pp. 3-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
CR  - Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
CR  - Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
CR  - Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338122
CR  - Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.
CR  - Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l’Éducation À Distance, 14(2), 50–71.
CR  - Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285–297.
CR  - Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1).
CR  - Saba, F., & Shearer, R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36–59.
CR  - Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications. New York: Routledge.
CR  - Shen, D., Nuankhieo, P., Huang, X., Amelung, C., & Laffey, J. (2008). Using social network analysis to understand sense of community in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39, 17–36.
CR  - Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
CR  - Soo, K. S., & Bonk, C. J. (1998). Interaction: What does it mean in online distance education?. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED428724
CR  - Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
CR  - Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.
CR  - Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2000). Principles of pedagogy and evaluation for web-based learning. Educational Media International, 37(2), 105–111.
CR  - Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R.
CR  - Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 728-748), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
CR  - Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), (pp. 315-327). New York: MacMillan Company.
CR  - Whiteman, J. A. M. (2002). Interpersonal communication in computer mediated learning. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED465997&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED465997
CR  - Winn, W. (1999). Learning in virtual environments: A theoretical framework and considerations for design. Education Media International, 36(4), 271–279.
CR  - Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187.
CR  - Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.
CR  - Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional model. In D. H. Schunk, & B. 
J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford.
CR  - Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
CR  - Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Achieving academic excellence: A Self-regulatory perspective. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 85-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
CR  - Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-72.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.365218
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/430352
ER  -