TY  - JOUR
TT  - IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU
AU  - Putri, Mentari Darma
AU  - Rusdiana, Dadi
PY  - 2017
DA  - December
DO  - 10.18768/ijaedu.370424
JF  - IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education
JO  - IJAEDU
PB  - OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2411-1821
SP  - 566
EP  - 572
VL  - 3
IS  - 9
KW  - Scientific Argumentation
KW  - Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill
N2  - This is a preliminary study aimed to identify students’ scientificargumentation skill at Junior High School 1, Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. Thedata were gathered by online survey to 8 science teachers in Bengkulu and testto 32 students of grade eight in Junior High School 1, Argamakmur, NorthBengkulu. Online survey consisted of 4 questions focused on sciencelearning issues. The essay test to obtainscientific argumentation skill consisted of 4 questions, where each question wascovering four indicators of scientific argumentation: claim, data, warrant andbacking. A valid scientific argumentation test was adopted from Putri (2016).Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics by calculating the percentageof average score of teacher answers and students’ scientific argumentationskill as a whole. The data analysis revealed that the teachers argue that students’scientific argumentation skill was still very low compared to others skill likethe science process skill, critical thinking skill, creative thinkingskill, scientific literacy skill and student independence and this statement supportedby test result where the score of students’ argumentation skill achieved lowcategory. This phenomenon might be caused bythe lack of educational learning process that facilitates students inexpressing their opinions according to scientific evidence both orally and inwriting. This paper also offers an idea helping teachers toimprove students’ scientific argumentation skill by implementingphenomenon-based learning with video assistance through a modified "flipped classroom" approach.
CR  - Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2009). Conceptualizations of Argumentation from Science Studies and the Learning Sciences and their Implications for the Practices of Science Education. Science education, 92(3), 473-498. 
Christenson, N., Rundgren, S.N.C., & Hoglund, H.O. (2012). Using the See-Sep Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students’ Use of Supporting Reason in Arguing Socioscientific Issues. Journal Science Education Technology, 21. p. 342-352.
Defianti, Aprina. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen menggunakan Multiple External Representations untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP. (Thesis). School of Postgraduate, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung. 
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing The Norms Of Scientific Argumentation In Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting And Promoting Argumentation Discourse In Science Education. Studies In Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. 
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Enhancing The Quality Of Argumentation In School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
Golanics & Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, And Learning: Preface And Literature Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345-359.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing The Lesson” Or “Doing Science”: Argument In High School Genetics. Science Education,84(6), 757e792.
Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The Sound Of Music: Constructing Science As A Sociocultural Practices Through Oral And Written Discourse. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 36(8), 883 – 915.
Kulatunga, U., Moog, R. S. & Lewis, J.E. (2013). Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions. Vol. 50. No. 10,pp. 1207-1231. United States of America: Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Newton, P. Driver, R. & Osborne, J. (1999). The Place Of Argumentation In The Pedagogy Of School Science. International Journal Of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
Osman, Chuo Hiong, & Vebrianto. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 102 (2013) 188-194.
Putri, Rahmah Evita. (2016). Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP Kelas VII Melalui Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu dengan Tema Halo pada Topik Kalor. (Thesis). School of Postgraduate, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung. 
Rustaman, N. (1996). Peranan Praktikum dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Training and Technician Training Papers FPMIPA IKIP Bandung.
Sampson & Gerbino. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95, page 217-257.
Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern In The Evaluation Of Argumentation In School Science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(3), 277e289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437270802417176. 
Venville, G.J., & Dawson, V.M. (2010a). The Impact of Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47. (8), p. 952-977.
Venville, G.J., & Dawson, V.M. (2010b). Teaching Strategies for Developing Student’s Argumentation Skills About Sosio-Scientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, vol.42, p. 133-148.
Yamin, Martinis. (2008). Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/390170
ER  -