TY  - JOUR
TT  - Comparative Analysis of Habitability Levels of Countries with COPRAS Method: BRICS Countries and Turkey
AU  - Öztel, Ahmet
AU  - Şahin, Can
PY  - 2017
DA  - December
Y2  - 2017
DO  - 10.46452/baksoder.370487
JF  - Uluslararası Batı Karadeniz Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi
JO  - USOBED
PB  - Batı Karadeniz Akademisyenler Derneği (BAKAD)
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2602-4594
SP  - 75
EP  - 84
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
KW  - Çok Kriterli Karar Verme
KW  - COPRAS
KW  - Yaşanabilirlik Düzeyi
KW  - BRICS Ülkeleri
N2  - Theability of people in a country to live a quality life depends on certaineconomic, social and political criteria. These criteria include a low rate ofunemployment, a fair distribution of income, urbanization, and quality ofeducation and health systems. In this study, comparative analysis of thehabitability levels of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa)countries with Turkey is aimed to be done by the COPRAS method. In the study,GDP, population density, average life span, unemployment rate, humandevelopment index have been taken as criteria. At the end of the study, theorder of the countries obtained with the data has been interpreted in theconclusion part. As a result of analysis, Russia has been detected to be thefirst country in terms of the level of habitability and the second is Chinawith a slight difference, and the last is South Africa. Turkey took the fourthplace in the rankings.
CR  - Aksoy, E., Ömürbek, N., Karaatlı, M., (2015). “AHP Temelli MULTIMOORA ve COPRAS Yöntemi ile Türkiye Kömür İşletmeleri'nin Performans Değerlendirilmesi”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, s:4, 1-28.
CR  - Aras, S. (2015). “Küresel Güney ve BRICS Ülkeleri”. Erişim adresi: http://akademikperspektif.com/2015/02/25/kuresel-guney-ve-brics-ulkeleri/ (10 Haziran 2017).
Başaran 2014, http://www.haberturk.com/yazarlar/cuneyt-basaran/985294-bric-ulkeleri-kan-agliyor, (Son erişim tarihi: 07 Haziran 2017 tarihinde erişildi.).
   
Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı Web Sitesi,  http://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/library/human_development/human-development-report-2015.html  (Son erişim tarihi: 07 Haziran 2017 tarihinde erişildi.).
CR  - Das, M.C., B. Sarkar, S. Ray (2012), “A Framework to Measure Relative Performance of Indian Technical Institutions using Integrated Fuzzy AHP and COPRAS Methodology”, Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 46(3), 230-241.
CR  - Dünya Bankası Web Sitesi, http://www.worldbank.org/tr/country/turkey (Son erişim tarihi: 07 Haziran 2017).
CR  - (Elbasan 2011, http://www.bilgesam.org/incele/86/-brics--çok-kutuplu-bir-dunyaya-dogru/#.WTg0ddSLSt8, 07 Haziran 2017 tarihinde erişildi.)
CR  - Energy and Buildings, 38 (5), 454-462. Popovic, G., D. Stanujkic, S. Stojanovic (2012), “Investment Project Selection by Applying COPRAS Method and Imprecise Data”, Serbian Journal of Management, 7(2), 257-269.
CR  - Kaklauskas, A., E.K. Zavadskas, S. Raslanas, R. Ginevicius, A. Komka, P. Malinauskas (2006), “Selection of Low-E Windows in Retrofit of Public Buildings By Applying Multiple Criteria Method COPRAS: A Lithuanian Case”,
CR  - Mulliner, E., K. Smallbone, V. Maliene (2013), “An Assessment of Sustainable Housing Affordability using a Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method”, Omega, 41(2), 270-279.
CR  - Nguyen, H.T., S.Z.M. Dawal, Y. Nukman, H. Aoyama (2014), “A Hybrid Approach for Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making in Machine Tool Selection with Consideration of the Interactions of Attributes”, Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6), 3078-3090.
CR  - Organ, A., Katrancı, A., (2016, Aralık). “Kırılgan Sekizli Olarak Adlandırılan Ülkelerin Yaşanabilirlik Düzeyinin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ile Değerlendirilmesi”. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 73-90.
CR  - Ömürbek, E. (2017). “PROMETHEE, MOORA ve COPRAS Yöntemleri İle Oran Analizi”. MEHMET Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. s:16,  174-187.
CR  - Özdağoğlu, A. (2013a). “İmalat işletmeleri için eksantrik pres alternatiflerinin COPRAS yöntemi ile karşılaştırılması”. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 8(Haziran), 1–22.
CR  - Özdağoğlu, A. (2013b). “Çok ölçütlü karar verme modellerinde normalizasyon tekniklerinin sonuçlara etkisi: COPRAS örneği”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(2), 229–252.
CR  - Podvezko, V. (2011), “The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS”. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(2), 134-146.
CR  - Sarıçalı, K. G. (2016). “AHP ve COPRAS Yöntemleri ile Otel Alternatiflerinin Değerlendirilmesi”. International Review Of Economics and Management, s. 45-66.
CR  - Staniunas, M., M. Medineckiene, E.K. Zavadskas, D. Kalibatas (2013) “To Modernize or Not: Ecological–Economical Assessment of Multi-Dwelling Houses Modernization”.  Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13(1), 88-98.
CR  - Tavana, M., E. Momeni, N. Rezaeiniya, S.M. Mirhedayatian, H. Rezaeiniya (2013), “A Novel Hybrid Social Media Platform Selection Model Using Fuzzy ANP and COPRAS-G”, Expert Systems with Applications, 40(14), 5694-5702.
CR  - Zavadskas, E.K., A. Kaklauskas, Z. Turskis, J. Tamosaitiene (2008), “Contractor Selection Multi- Attribute Model Applynig COPRAS Method With Grey Interval Numbers”, International Conference 20th EURO Mini Conference “Continuous Optimization and Knowledge-Based Technologies” (EurOPT-2008), 20-23 May 2008, Neringa, Lithuania, 241-247.
CR  - Zolfani, S.H., N. Rezaeiniya, M.H. Aghdaie, E.K. Zavadskas (2012), “Quality Control Manager Selection Based on AHP-COPRAS-G Methods: A Case in Iran”, Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 25(1), 88-104.
CR  - Zolfani, S.H., E.K. Zavadkas (2013), “Sustainable Development of Rural Areas’ Building Structures Based on Local Climate”, Procedia Engineering, 57, 1295-1301.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46452/baksoder.370487
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/394940
ER  -