TY - JOUR TT - IMPORTANCE OF REASONABLENESS TESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ITS APPLICATIONS AU - Mert, Huseyin AU - Bas, Ece AU - Eren, Hasan Melih PY - 2017 DA - December DO - 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.743 JF - PressAcademia Procedia JO - PAP PB - Suat TEKER WT - DergiPark SN - 2459-0762 SP - 39 EP - 42 VL - 6 IS - 1 KW - Reasonableness Test KW - analytical procedures KW - independent audit KW - analytical review KW - risk of misstatement N2 - Objective-Analytical procedures have higher potential compared to test of details interms of analysing the account relationships, detecting significant risk ofmisstatement, reducing audit fieldwork and testing management assertions. Inorder to get benefit of those procedures, auditors should access more entityspecific resources and invest more time in planning the audit program. In thisstudy, reasonableness tests that are generally used in substantive analyticalprocedures are analysed through industry examples and their role in reducingthe audit risk is demonstrated. Methodology-In this study, case study method is used as a research methodology. The reasonof selecting this methodology is due to its relevance in accordance with theobjective of the study as well as providing an opportunity to auditors thatwould like to implement reasonableness tests. Findings-This study reveals, through examples that can be used in practice, that themanagement claims can be tested more soundly through rationality tests whenmore time is given to the stages of understanding the enterprise and planningthe audit. Conclusion-Among the analytical review techniques, reasonableness test is highlyeffective technique for testing the relationship between non-financialinformation and financial information. In order to use the reasonableness testsmore frequently in the evidence collection, understanding the enterprise, moresenior and industry specific team construction and accessing the non-financialinformation by inquiring also the performance indicators used by the enterpriseare important. Agreements for longer than a year between the auditor and thecompany will reinforce the auditor's accumulated knowledge on the enterprisethat will increase number of reasonableness tests. CR - McKee T., Modern Analytical Auditing: Practical Guidance for Auditors and Accountants, Quorum Boks, New York, 1989, SS. 5 CR - KGK, http://www.kgk.sakarya.edu.tr/FileUploads/Src/de3a13f5-3322-4362-a3b7- 88cfe3e2e3e0/B%C3%B6l%C3%BCm%203_2%20ekitap%20-%204.6.%20Analitik%20Prosed%C3%BCrler.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 24.05.2017 CR - Kaval H., 2005, Muhasebe Denetimi, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara, ss. 146 CR - Choo T.M., Chua M.K., Ong C.B., Tan T.H., ,1997, “Analytical Procedures for New and Matured Industries”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 12/3, 123-134. CR - Arens A.A., Elder R.J., Beasley M.S., 2012, Auditing and Assurance Services an Integrated Approach, Fourteenth Edition, Pearson,ss. 224. CR - AICPA, Statements on Auditing Standarts No:56 Analytical Procedures, New York, 1989. CR - IFAC, International Standarts on Auditing 520: Analytical Procedures, Handbook of International Auditing, Assurence and Ethics Pronouncements, New York, 2007. CR - Blocher E., Patterson G.F., “The Use of Analytical Procedures”, Journal of Accountancy, February (1996), 53-55. CR - Fraser I.A.M., Hatherly D.J., Lin K.Z., “An Empirical Investigation of The Use of Analytical Review By External Auditors”, British Accounting Review, 29, (1997), 35-47. CR - Ameen E.C., Strawser J.R., “Investigating The Use of Analytical Procedures: An Update and Extension”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.13, No.2, (1994), 69-76. CR - Dönmez A., Ersoy A., “Bağımsız Denetim Sürecinde Analitik İnceleme Prosedürleri: Türkiye’de SPK’dan Yetki Almış Denetim Firmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Bilig, 56, (2011), 131-132 UR - https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.743 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/392999 ER -