TY  - JOUR
T1  - Mulligan bent leg raise tekniği ve kinesiotape’nin hamstring kası kısalığına anlık etkilerinin karşılaştırılması
TT  - The comparison of İmmediate Effects of Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise Technique and Kinesiotape on Hamstring Tightness
AU  - Keskin, Tahir
AU  - Başkurt, Ferdi
AU  - Başkurt, Zeliha
AU  - İnce Parpucu, Tuba
PY  - 2018
DA  - September
Y2  - 2018
DO  - 10.26453/otjhs.396718
JF  - Online Turkish Journal of Health Sciences
JO  - OTSBD
PB  - Oğuz KARABAY
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2459-1467
SP  - 135
EP  - 144
VL  - 3
IS  - 3
LA  - tr
AB  - Çalışmamızın amacı hamstring kası kısalığınamulligan bent leg raise (BLR) tekniği vekinezyoteyp (KT) uygulamasının anlık ve 24 saatlik etkisini ve belirlemektir.Çalışmaya hamstring kısalığı olan 54 kişi katılmış ve randomize olarak ikigruba ayrılmıştır. (grup 1= BLR grubu, grup 2= KT grubu). Hamstring kısalığınıdeğerlendirmek amacıyla otur-uzan testi yapılmış ve aktif diz ekstensiyonderecesi halo gonyometre ile ölçülmüştür.Değerlendirmeler uygulamadan önce, 30 dakika sonra ve 24 saat sonrayapılmıştır. Değerlendirmelerin analizi sonucunda her iki grupta da otur- uzantesti ve aktif diz ekstensiyon derecesinde anlamlı artış gözlenmiştir(p=0,000). Gruplar kendi aralarında karşılaştırıldığında, otur- uzan testinde30 dakika sonra yapılan ölçümlerde BLR tekniğinin (p=0,010); 24 saat sonrayapılan ölçümlerde ise KT uygulamasının (0.032) etkinliğinin istatistikselolarak daha anlamlı olduğu bulunmuştur. Aktif diz ekstensiyon derecesinde ise30 dakika sonra yapılan ölçümlerde BLR tekniğinin (0,00) etkinliğiistatistiksel olarak daha anlamlı bulunmuştur. Diğer test parametrelerindeistatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır. Hem KT uygulaması hemde BLR tekniği hamstring kası esnekliğinin artırılmasında etkilidir. Hamstringkısalığına yönelik anlık etki istendiğinde BLR tekniğinin, daha uzun sürelietki istendiğinde ise KT uygulamasının daha etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.
KW  - Esneklik
KW  - hamstring kası
KW  - mulligan bent leg raise tekniği
KW  - kinesiotape
KW  - aktif diz ekstensiton testi
N2  - The aim of this study is to investigate the immediate and 24- hours effectsof Mulligan’s bent leg raise (BLR) technique and kinesio tape (KT) on hamstringtightness. 54 subjects with hamstring tightness participated in the study andand the subjects were randomly divided into two groups (group 1= BLR, group 2=KT group). To assess hamstring tightness, sit and reach test was performed andthe active knee extension grade was measured with a halo goniometer.Measurements were taken pre- intervention, 30 minutes after intervention and 24hours after intervention. After the analyses of the measurements, statisticallysignificant increase were found in both groups on active knee extension and sitand reach test (p=0,000). In comparison of the groups; after 30 min.measurements BLR results showed statistically significant improvement than KT(p=0,01), however after 24 hours measurements; statistically significantimprovement was detected in KT than BLR (p=0,032) on sit and reach test. Onactive knee extension test BLR showed greater improvement than KT atmeasurements taken after 30 minutes (p=0,00).There were no statistically significant differences on the other testparameters. Both KT application and BLR technique are effective on increasinghamstring muscle’s flexibility. It has been determined that the BLR techniqueis more effective in the need of immediate effect on hamstring shortness andthe KT application is more effective when the longer effect is required.
CR  - Referans1. Patni O, M Saravanan, Shaikh A, Juneja A, Shaikh N, Patel R. Effect of single bout of passive stretching and Mulligan's Bent Leg Raise (BLR) on Hamstring flexibility in young adults with asymptomatic bilateral Hamstring tightness. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2013; 9: 3.
CR  - Referans2. Hopper D, Deacon S, Das S, Jain A, Riddell D, Hall T, Briffa K. Dynamic soft tissue mobilisation increases hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 594–598.
CR  - Referans3. Khuman P R, Surbala L, Patel P, Chavda D. Immediate Effects of Single Session Post Isometric Relaxation Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2014; 3; 9.
CR  - Referans4. Singh B K, Pattnaik M, Mohanty P. A Comparative Study of Mulligan Traction Straight Leg Raising and Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization to Increase Hamstrings’ s Flexibility. 2016; 5; 4.
CR  - Referans5. Ozmen T, Gunes GY, Dogan H, Ucar I, Willems M. The effect of kinesio taping versus stretching techniques on muscle soreness, and flexibility during recovery from nordic hamstring exercise. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2017; 21: 41- 47
CR  - Referans6. Hall T, Hardt S, Schafer A, Wallin l. Mulligan bent leg raise technique—a preliminary randomized trial of immediate effects after a single intervention. Manual Therapy. 2006; 11: 130–135.
CR  - Referans7. Medeni ÖÇ, Baltacı G, Vayvay GD. Acute effect of kinesiotape muscle technique on hamstring flexibility and pain during stretching. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2015; 26(2): 73-77
CR  - Referans8. Phansopkar P A, Kage V. Efficacy of mulligan’s two leg rotation and bent leg raise techniques in hamstring flexibility in subjects with acute non-specific low back pain: randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2014;  2(5): 733-41.
CR  - Referans9. Kage V, Ratnam R. Immediate effect of active release technique versus mulligan bent leg raise in subjects with hamstring tightness: A randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2014; 2(1): 301-04.
CR  - Referans10. Patel, G. To compare the effectiveness of mulligan bent leg raising and slump stretching in patient with low back pain. Indian J. Physiother. Occup. Ther. An Int. 2014. J. 8: 24–28.
CR  - Referans11. Ayala F, Baranda P.S, Santonja F. Comparison of active stretching technique in males with normal and limited hamstring flexibility. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2013; 14(2):  98-104
CR  - Referans12. Dixon JK, Keating JL. Variability in straight leg raise measurements: review. Physiotherapy. 2000; 86(7): 361–70.13. Farquharson C, Greig M. Temporal efficacy of kinesiology tape vs. traditional stretching methods on hamstring extensibility. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2015; 10: 1.
CR  - Referans14. Marban MR, Rodrıguez FE, Fernandez IL, Vega DM. The acute effect of kinesio taping on hamstring extensibility in university students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2011; 11(2): 23-27
CR  - Referans15. Lumbroso D, Ziv E, Vered E, Kalichman L. The effect of kinesio tape application on hamstring and gastrocnemius muscles in healthy young adults. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies. 2014; 18: 130-138
CR  - Referans16. Chen CH, Tsun-Shun Huang TS, Chai HM, Jan MH, Lin JJ. Two Stretching Treatments for the Hamstrings: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Versus Kinesio Taping. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2013; 22: 59-66
CR  - Referans17. Halseth T, McChesney JW, DeBeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J. The effects of kinesiotape on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med. 2004; 3: 1-7.18. Tsai HJ, Hung HC, Yang JL, Huang CS, Tsauo JY. Could Kinesio tape replace the bandage in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast-cancer-related lymphedema? A pilot study. Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17(11): 1353-60.
CR  - Referans19. Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method. Tokyo. Ken Ikai Co. Ltd. 2003.
CR  - Referans20. Hamid MS, Mohamed Ali MR, Yusof A. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Active Knee Extension (AKE) Test among Healthy Adults. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2013; 25: 957–961
CR  - Referans21. Baltaci G, Un N, Tunay V, Besler A, Gerçeker S. Comparison of three different sit and reach tests for measurement of hamstring flexibility in female university students. Br J Sports Med.  2003; 37: 59–61
UR  - https://doi.org/10.26453/otjhs.396718
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/530054
ER  -