TY - JOUR T1 - An Evaluation on New Governmental System Discussions and System Proposals in Turkey TT - An Evaluation on New Governmental System Discussions and System Proposals in Turkey AU - Bulut, Yakup AU - Akın, Soner PY - 2018 DA - July DO - 10.25069/spmj.404803 JF - Strategic Public Management Journal JO - SPMJ PB - Yüksel DEMİRKAYA WT - DergiPark SN - 2149-9543 SP - 13 EP - 26 VL - 4 IS - 7 LA - en AB - AbstractHistorically, many countries have sought to establish a more stable governmental system. At world scale; it is seen that the most common systems of government in practice today are "presidential", "semi-presidential" and "parliamentary system". The obstacles in the governmental systems are instability in the administration which starts the search for new system. Along with the new governmental system proposals in Turkey, it was begun to be argued that the "Turkish Type", "Presidential Parliamentary System", "Half Presidency", "Presidency" and "Party Presidency" models in Turkey wanted a stable government. In Turkey, the influence of pressure groups such as the categorized business world and media have been included in the system discussions, though those discussions were not carried out in a comprehensive manner. Deficiencies in Turkey, especially in the culture of political reconciliation, political instability, ineffectiveness of members of the legislative body, can be seen as the factors that trigger the search for new systems. This study will focus on the new positional arguments in the context of the system discussions in Turkey on behalf of stable and long-term management, discussing the proposals of constitutional amendments in terms of probable deficiencies, political instability, and ineffectiveness of legislative members. KW - Government System in Turkey KW - Government System Proposals KW - Strong Executive Organ N2 - AbstractHistorically, manycountries have sought to establish a more stable governmental system. At worldscale; it is seen that the most common systems of government in practice todayare "presidential", "semi-presidential" and"parliamentary system". The obstacles in the governmental systems areinstability in the administration which starts the search for new system. Alongwith the new governmental system proposals in Turkey, it was begun to be arguedthat the "Turkish Type", "Presidential ParliamentarySystem", "Half Presidency", "Presidency" and"Party Presidency" models in Turkey wanted a stable government. InTurkey, the influence of pressure groups such as the categorized business worldand media have been included in the system discussions, though thosediscussions were not carried out in a comprehensive manner. Deficiencies inTurkey, especially in the culture of political reconciliation, politicalinstability, ineffectiveness of members of the legislative body, can be seen asthe factors that trigger the search for new systems. This study will focus onthe new positional arguments in the context of the system discussions in Turkeyon behalf of stable and long-term management, discussing the proposals ofconstitutional amendments in terms of probable deficiencies, politicalinstability, and ineffectiveness of legislative members. CR - Aydın, A. H., and Durgun, S. (2017) “Kuvvetler Ayrılığı/Birliği Açısından Türkiye’de Partili Cumhurbaşkanlığı Sistemi”. Icpess 2017-Sarajevo Bosnia., 2017 CR - Bayram, S. (2016), “Türkiye’de Başkanlık Sistemi Tartışmaları: Algılar, Argümanlar ve Tezler”. SETA. 2016, January CR - Demirhan, Y., Aslan, S., and Alkış, M. (2016), “Türkiye’de Hükümet Sistemi Tartışmaları ve Ak Parti’nin Başkanlık Sistemi Önerisi Üzerine”, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, S.11, ss.161-186. UR - https://doi.org/10.25069/spmj.404803 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/528414 ER -