TY  - JOUR
T1  - Self-Evaluations of High School Students Regarding to Own Metacognitive Behaviours In Problem Solving
TT  - Lise Öğrencilerinin Problem Çözmede Gösterdikleri Üstbilişsel Davranışlara İlişkin Öz-Değerlendirmeleri
AU  - Kartalcı, Sebiha
AU  - Demircioğlu, Handan
PY  - 2018
DA  - September
JF  - MATDER Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi
PB  - Matematikçiler Derneği
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2148-1822
SP  - 19
EP  - 31
VL  - 3
IS  - 1
LA  - en
AB  - The aim of the study is to ensure that high school students evaluatethemselves in terms of metacognitive behaviors that they demonstrate duringtheir problem solving process through their experiences of problem solving and to examine this process. The study was designed as a qualitative study andthe obtained data were interpreted by descriptive analysis. The working groupconsists of a total of 94 students in 9th and 10th grade in a high school in adistrict of Yozgat in the academic year of 2015-2016. To collect data, studentswere first given 2 problems. Students are asked to clearly solve these problemsand write down what they think. A questionnaire was applied to the students whosolved these problems to evaluate the metacognitive behaviors in the problemsolving process. When the data obtained from the questionnaire are analyzed, itcan be considered that the majority of the students exhibit highly metacognitivebehaviors without problem solving. However, the problem solutions of thestudents do not match these results very much; it is understood that themetacognitive behaviors that the students say they have shown and themetacognitive behaviors that emerged from examining the problem solutions arenot generally parallel to each other.
KW  - metacognition
KW  - self-evaluations
KW  - high school students
N2  - Çalışmanınamacı, lise öğrencilerinin problem çözme deneyimlerini gözden geçirerek busüreçte sergiledikleri üstbilişsel davranışlar açısından kendilerinideğerlendirmelerini sağlamak ve bu süreci incelemektir. Araştırma nitel birçalışma olarak tasarlanmış, elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz ileyorumlanmıştır. Çalışma grubunu 2015-2016 eğitim ve öğretim yılında Yozgatilinin bir ilçesindeki bir lisede 9 ve 10. sınıfta öğrenim gören toplam 94öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplamak için öğrencilere ilk olarak 2 taneproblem verilmiştir. Öğrencilerden bu problemleri açık bir şekilde çözmeleri vedüşündüklerini yazmaları istenmiştir. Bu problemleri çözen öğrencilere problemçözme sürecindeki üstbilişsel davranışları değerlendirmeyi sağlayan bir anketuygulanmıştır. Anketten elde edilen veriler analiz edildiğinde öğrencilerinçoğunluğunun problem çözmede yüksek düzeyde üstbilişsel davranışlar sergilediğidüşünülebilmektedir. Ancak öğrencilerin problem çözümlerinin bu sonuçlarla çokuyuşmadığı; öğrencilerin göstermiş olduklarını söyledikleri üstbilişseldavranışlar ile problem çözümlerinin incelenmesiyle ortaya çıkan üstbilişseldavranışlar birbiriyle genellikle paralellik göstermediği anlaşılmaktadır.
CR  - Akın, A., & Abacı, R. (2011). Metacognition.  Nobel Publishing, Ankara.
CR  - Aksoy, N. (2003). Action Research: A Method to be Used to Improve and Change Educational Practices. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education Management, 9(4), 474-489.
CR  - Biryukov, P.(2004). Metacognitive Aspects of Solving Combinatorics Problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning (01.07.2006) www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/biryukov.pdf
CR  - Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing When, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glasser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.
CR  - Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding. chapter 3 (pp. 65-116). London: LEA Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
CR  - Çakıroğlu, A. (2007). Metacognition. Turkey Social Research Journal, 11 (2), 21-27.
CR  - Demircioğlu, H. (2008).  The Influence of the Educational Situations Designed for the Development of Metacognitive Behaviour of Mathematics Teacher Candidates. Ph. D. Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
CR  - Doğan, A. (2013). Metacognition and Metacognitive Teaching. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, (3), 6-20.
CR  - Flavell, J.H.(1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. American Psychologist, 34 (10) 906-911, October 1979.
CR  - Fortunato, I, Hecht, D., Title, C. K and Alvarez, L. (1991). Metacognition and Problem Solving. The Arithmetic Teacher. Dec. 39(4) 38
CR  - Garafalo J., Lester, F. (1985) Metacognition, cognitive monitoring and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,16,163–175.
CR  - Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An Overview. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED474273.pdf (15.04.2018)
CR  - Ministry of Education (MEB) Commission (2015). Secondary Mathematics Class 9 1st Book, Meb Publications,  Ankara. S.108, 198.
CR  - Özsoy, G. (2008). Metacognition. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 713-740.
CR  - Panaoura, A., & Philippou, G. (2005). The measurement of young pupils’ metacognitive ability in mathematics: The case of self-representation and self-evaluation. In Proceedings of CERME (Vol. 4).
CR  - Pugalee, D.K.(2001). Writing, Mathematics and Metacognition: Looking for Connections Through Students’ Work in Mathematical Problem Solving, School Science and Mathematics 101(5), 236–245.
CR  - Şahin, M. (2015). Mathematics 10, Palme Publishing, Ankara. S.10,97
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/med/issue//454724
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/594318
ER  -