TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Effect of Axial Selection on Static Solution Results in Heat Affected Non-Prismatic Elementary Frames
AU  - Karaduman, Adnan
PY  - 2018
DA  - June
Y2  - 2017
JF  - Journal of International Environmental Application and Science
JO  - J. Int. Environmental Application & Science
PB  - Şükrü DURSUN
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1307-0428
SP  - 82
EP  - 88
VL  - 13
IS  - 2
LA  - en
AB  - In this study, theinfluence of the bar axis selection on the static solution results wasinvestigated in-plane carrier systems consisting of non-prismatic bar elements(height variable bar elements, also known as hunched, along the axis) in termsof equal or different heat exchange effect. On the sample considered, thenon-prismatic elements are considered as straight-axis bars. The resultsobtained from the classical analysis (thesection change is taken into account only at the bending stiffness in thismethod) and the solution results, which are proposed for non-prismaticelements, obtained by considering the weight axis of the element as a bar axisare compared and the relative differences was detected with differences betweentwo results. 
KW  - non-prismatic
KW  - hunched
KW  - different heat
KW  - stiffness
KW  - bars
KW  - equal heat
CR  - Cross H, Morgan N, (1958) Continuous Frames Of Reinforced Concrete, 14th Ed., John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, pp.126-155.
CR  - Portlant Cement Association, (1958) Handbook of frame constants, Beam Factors and moment coefficients for members of variable section, Pordland Cement Asssociation, Chicago,III.
Resende and Doyle (1981) NONPRI-An effective nonprimatic three dimensional beam finite element. Comp. & Struc., 14, 71-77.
Eisenberg,M.,(1985) Explicit Stiffness Matrices Nonprismatic Members, Comp & Struc., 20, 715-720.
CR  - Mezaini N, Balkaya, C, Çıtıpıtıoğlu E, (1991) Analysis of Frames with Nonprismatic Members, ASCE, 117, 1573-1591.
TopçuA, (1992) Degişken Kesitli Düzlem çerçeve Elemanların Temel Rijitlik Katsayılarının ve Ankastrelik Kuvvetlerinin Analitik ve Romberg integrasyon Yöntemi ile Hesabı, İnsaat Müh. Bilgisayar Kullanımı III. Semp., İ.T.U., İstanbul.
CR  - Karaduman A, (1993) Değişken Kesitli Düzlem Taşıyıcı Sistemlerin Matris Deplasman Yöntemi ile Statik Çözümü, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İnşaat Mühendisligi Anabilim Dalı, Konya, 132 s.
CR  - Fertis DG, Keene ME, (1990), Elastic and Inelastic Analysis of Non-Prismatic Members, J Struct. Eng., 116, 475-489.
CR  - Ruta, F, (1999), Application of Chebychev series to solution of non-prismatic beam vibration problems, J. Sound & Vibration 227, 449-467.
CR  - Yuksel SB, (2012), Assessment of non-prismatic beams having symmetrical parabolic haunches with constant haunch length ratio of 0.5, Struct. Engi. & Mech., 22, 849-866.
CR  - Archundia-Aranda H, Grande-Vega A, Tena-Colunga A, (2013) Behaviour of reinforced concrete haunched beams subjected to cyclic shear loading,  J. Struct. Eng., 49, 27-42.
CR  - Raju P.M, Rajsekhar K,  Sandeep T.R,(2014), Performance of non-prismatic simply supported prestressed concrete beams,  Struct. Eng. & Mech., 52, 723-738.
CR  - Orr JJ, Ibell TJ, Darby AP, (2014) Shear behavior of non-prismatic steel reinforced concrete beams, Eng. Struct., 71, 48-59.
CR  - Thermou GE, Katakalos K., Manos G.(2015), Influence of the cross section shape on the behaviour of SRG-confined prismatic concrete specimens, Materials and Struct./Materiaux et Constructions, 19p
CR  - Topçu A, (1992) Degişken Kesitli Düzlem çerçeve Elemanların Temel Rijitlik Katsayılarının ve Ankastrelik Kuvvetlerinin Analitik ve Romberg integrasyon Yöntemi ile Hesabı, İnsaat Mühendisliginde Bilgisayar Kullanımı III. Sempozyumu, İ.T.U., İstanbul.
CR  - Çakıroglu A, Çetmeli E, (1976) Yapı Statiği, Cilt II, İ.T.Ü.Matbaası, İstanbul.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jieas/article/477366
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/565523
ER  -