TY - JOUR TT - Adaptation of Social Interaction Learning Styles by Freshman Engineering Students in Communication Courses AU - Deveci, Tanju PY - 2013 DA - December JF - Yükseköğretim Dergisi JO - TÜBA-HER PB - Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi WT - DergiPark SN - 2146-796X SP - 121 EP - 128 VL - 3 IS - 3 KW - Değişiklik KW - GRSLSS KW - mühendislik eğitimi KW - öğrenme stilleri. N2 - This study aimed to determine the effects of communication courses on engineering students use of social interaction learning styles at the Petroleum Institute, the UAE. A total of 62 freshman students participated in the study during 2012-2013 academic year. The quantitative data were collected using the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scales (GRSLSS). A paired sample t-test and the Wilcoxon test were used to investigate the pre-test and post-test results. Semi-structured interviews were also held with 10 of the consenting participants to gather qualitative data. The results indicated that the participants adapted some of their learning styles reflected by increased scores for collaborative, participant and avoidant styles and by decreased scores for competitive and dependent styles. Some of these changes were attributed to the participants engagement in constant teamwork as well as multi-cultural aspects of the learning context. It is suggested that engineering students be exposed to more teamwork activities, which involve more active learning styles in order to be better equipped with soft-skills that engineers require. CR - ABET (2013). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Engineering Accreditation Commission. Accessed through ocess/Accreditation_Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012- 2013.pdf> on 07.01.2013. CR - Borges, N. J., and Parmelee, D. X. (2011). Changes in personality and learning styles for first year medical students. Medical Science Educator, 21(3), 200-202. CR - Budakoglu. I., Demirli, E., and Babadogan, C. (2012). Learning styles of term 1 medical students in Turkish and English departments of med- ical faculty. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3271-3274. CR - Burnham, J. W., and Coates, M. (2007). Personalizing learning: Transforming education for every child. London: Continuum. CR - Cartney, P. (2000). Adult learning styles: Implications for practice teach- ing in social work. Social Work Education, 19(6), 609-626 CR - Chan, I. C. Y., and Lam, S. (2008). Effects of competition on students’ self- efficacy in vicarious learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 95-108. CR - Diaz, D. P., and Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130-135. CR - Grasha, A. F. (2006). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learn- ing by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Bernardino: Alliance Publishers. CR - Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Smith, K. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35. CR - Kanske, C. A., Brewster, L. T., and Fanjoy, R. O. (2003). A longitudinal study of the learning styles of college aviation students. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 3(1), 79-89. CR - Keefe, J. W. (1974). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. CR - Kumar, P., Kumar, A., and Smart, K. (2004). Assessing the impact of instructional methods and information technology on student learning styles. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 533-544. CR - Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., and Simon, R. (2002). University students’ per- ceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52. CR - Mays, N., and Pope, C. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109-112. CR - Meeuwsen, H. J., King, G. A., and Pederson, R. (2005). Effects of coop- erative learning strategy on undergraduate kinesiology students’ learning styles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 525-530. CR - Novak, S., Shah, S., Wilson, J.P., Lawson, K.A., and Salzman, R.D. (2006). Pharmacy students’ learning styles before and after a prob- lem-based learning experience. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70, Article 74. CR - Reid, J. M. (1987). The Learning style preferences of ESL students, TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111. CR - Riechmann, S. W., and Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. The Journal of Psychology, 87(2), 213-223. CR - Yang, J. F. (2008). Learning styles and perceived educational quality in e- learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 6(1), 63-77. CR - Zelazek, J. R. (1986). Learning styles, gender, and life cycle stage: Relationships with respect to graduate students. Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii. (Retrieved from ERIC database, ED276371) UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yuksekogretim/issue//498172 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/598446 ER -