TY - JOUR T1 - THE USE OF NETWORK MODELING IN THE STUDY OF SELF-ORGANIZATION ACTIVITIES OF GRADUATE STUDENTS AU - Rybakov, Andrey AU - Pakhmutova, Marina AU - Bakhtina, Svetlana AU - Ling, Gao PY - 2019 DA - April DO - 10.18768/ijaedu.531621 JF - IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education JO - IJAEDU PB - OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research WT - DergiPark SN - 2411-1821 SP - 29 EP - 34 VL - 5 IS - 13 LA - en AB - The article is devoted tothe problem of self-organization of activity and psychological factors ofsuccess of educational activities of graduate students. The concept of“self-organization”, actively discussed in Russian science, does not have anexact equivalent in English-language publications. From the point of view ofproceduralism, self-organization is an independent step-by-step construction bya person of the structure of his features, motives and ideals.Self-organization has two aspects: the construction of an “I-image” or self-esteem— an internal aspect, and the organization of one’s activity or its success —an external aspect. In the works of S.N. Kostromina, S.I. Rozum, N.A. Loginova,as well as in our previous works, showed that the integrity of the structure ofpersonal qualities (“I-image”) determines the success of an activity. At thesame time, the structure of personality traits changes in the process ofperforming activities (abilities are formed, self-esteem changes, etc.). Thisstudy is devoted to the external aspect of self-organization, which we call“self-organization of activity”, and its relationship with personality traits.The purpose of the study isto describe the model of self-organization of graduate students. The task ofthe study was to build a network model of the relationship between thecharacteristics of students' activities and their personality traits andvalues. The graph method or the network modeling method was used as a tool. Thesample consisted of 44 graduate students (mean age 20.6 ± 2.6 years, m-19,f-25). At the first stage a correlation analysis of the relationship betweenthe characteristics of the activity and the personality traits of the subjectswas carried out. At the second stage a model of self-organization of students 'activities was built with the help of the program "Gephi 0.9.2". As a result, it was foundthat such characteristics of activity as flexibility (correction),purposefulness (goal setting), planning and self-control are most deeplyintegrated into the structure of personality traits. Personality features aremanifested in these characteristics of activity, forming complexes of featuresor stable combinations around them. In this case, the connecting link of theentire model is such features as risk avoidance, sociability and self-controlof behavior. The ability to plan and self-monitor the implementation ofactivities, developed in this group of subjects, is aimed at achieving suchvalue as recognition of the success of the people around them. Orientation tothe creative approach is manifested in the adjustment of the activity, but itprevents the adequate analysis of the conditions of the activity. In addition,the identified complexes of features are associated with a particular area ofthe individual. When planning activities, subjects are guided by relations withthe closest environment, while in self-control of activities they based on highdemands and their own prudence. Flexibility of activity is connected withdomination in society and adaptation to new situations, while goal-setting -with self-confidence. In conclusion we must say that the described model ofself-organization of activities ensures the successful implementation ofstudents ' learning activities. It is proposed to conduct training sessionswith students in order to form additional motivational attitudes of students'activities and the development of qualities necessary for the organization ofactivities. KW - network modeling KW - self-organization KW - graduate students KW - personality KW - educational psychology CR - Khinkanina, A. (2014). Exhibiting Affiliation with Disabled Children in Diverse Social Development Situations. Third annual international conference early childhood care and education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 146. Khromov, A. B. (2000). Five-factor personality questionnaire: Study guide. Kurgan: Publishing House of the Kurgan State University. Kostromina, S., Gnedykh, D. (2015). Students' psychological Characteristics as Factor of Effective Acquisition of Visual Information In E-learning. Future academy multidisciplinary conference. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 217. Miloradova, N. G. (2005). Psychology and pedagogy. Moscow: Gardariki. Morozova, O. A. (2017) Structural network modeling in cognitive science. Psychological studies, Vol. 10 (55). Paatova, M., Chermit, K., Naumenko, Y. (2018). The concept of the formation of socio-personal viability in adolescents with deviant behaviour. SHS Web of Conferences. Vol. 55. Pakhmutova, M., Bakhtina, S., Rybakov, A. (2017). Interrelation of personality characteristics and the subject of activity in the process of self-organization of personality. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2017-4th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities 10-12 July 2017. Dubai, UAE. Raigorodskii, D. Y. (2004). Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests. Samara: Publishing House "Bahrah". Rozum, S. I. (2001). Unconscionable pedagogic psychology. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, Vol. 22. UR - https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.531621 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/706367 ER -