TY  - JOUR
T1  - PERFORMANCE AND APPRAISAL FRAMEWORK FOR UNTRAINED TEACHERS WORKING IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS OF KARACHI
AU  - Khan, Hina Hameed
AU  - Suhag, Abdul Karim
PY  - 2019
DA  - April
DO  - 10.18768/ijaedu.531634
JF  - IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education
JO  - IJAEDU
PB  - OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2411-1821
SP  - 58
EP  - 65
VL  - 5
IS  - 13
LA  - en
AB  - Theneed for performance and appraisal framework has immense importance globallyand the need for the specific tool for evaluating teacher’s performance whichis already practiced and required globally. The participants are 40 whichinclude teachers and head teachers from both primary and secondary schoolingsystem as well as the management staff. The selection is made on convenienceand availability of the participant to be a part of this research as respondents.The methodology for conducting data is informal discussions with therespondents and they facilitate their discussion with giving positive feedbackand responses by keeping in mind the objectives of the need of research. However,the major findings of this research paper is that the number of schools doesnot have a proper performance tool and the teachers are unaware of theperformance and appraisal criterions, whereas, these schools also does not havea proper skilled management department to keep a track of teachers’ performanceand appraisal records and no proper framework is developed for teachers’performance and appraisal management. Therefore,this study is reflecting the importance of performance and appraisal frameworkfor untrained teachers working in private schools of Karachi.
KW  - Untrained teacher
KW  - Performance management
KW  - Appraisal
CR  - 1.	Teacher Performance Appraisal in Thailand. ( 2005). Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 115–127.
2.	Chand, s. (n.d.). Performance Appraisal Methods: Traditional and Modern Methods (with example). 
3.	Deoborah.F.Boiceics, B. (1997). Designing effective performance appraisal systems. International Journal of productivity and performance management, 197-201.
4.	Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher Performance Appraisal: More about Performance or. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 102-116.
5.	Fatima, S. A. (2016). Teachers Insight about Performance Appraisal System and Its Inferences on Their Commitment and Skills of Job at Secondary Level. Journal of Socialomics.
6.	(febuary 2003). Education and Manpower Bureau. manpower bureau.
7.	Fekete, M. (2014). The practical model of employees performance. Human capital without border management (pp. 141-149). portorz solivinia: MAKE LEARN.
8.	George.o.Odhiomo. (2005). Teacher appraisal: the experiences of Kenyan secondary school teachers. Journal of education adminstration, 402-416.
9.	Greogary D.Rankin, B. S. (1988). Effective performance appraisal. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 13-17.
10.	Ingvarson, L. (2010). Recognising Accomplished Teachers in Australia: Where have We been? Where are We Heading? Australian Journal of education (ACER), 46-71.
11.	Isore, M. (2009). Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature OECD education working paper. t. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
12.	Jerome.V'.Dagistano, S. (2009). Predicting Teacher Performance With Test Scores and Grade Point Average: A Meta-Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 146-182.
13.	Jindal, S., & Laveena. (2015). Study of effectiveness of performance appraisal. International journal of research granthaalyah, 2394-3629.
14.	Jorge M. S, C. F. (2010). Directions for Future Research,Rio D janeiro,A Literature Review of Maintenance Performance Measurement. 1-15.
15.	Kimberly.A.Lawless, J. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. SAGE journals, 575-614.
16.	Larsen, M. A. (Oct 2009). Stressful, Hectic, Daunting: A Critical Policy Study of the Ontario Teacher Performance Appraisal System. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 1-44.
17.	Lawrence, E. H. (2006). Teacher accountability in Australia: current policies and practices and their relation to the improvement of teaching and learning. Research Paper In Education, 31-49.
18.	Liliane. M, P. M. (2009). Empirical Analysis of Maintenance Performance. International Journal Of Production Research, 5901-5920.
19.	Milanowsky, A. ( 2009). The Relationship Between Teacher Performance Evaluation Scores and Student Achievement: Evidence From Cincinnati. Peabody Journal Of Education, 33-53.
20.	Nandamuri, D. P. (2015). An Appraisal of the Teacher Appraisal System. Avenshek, 5.
21.	Neeti, S. (2015). Study of performance appraisal system and it’s effectiveness in fmcg industry . International Journal of Research & Development in Technology and Management Science –Kailash,Volume - 22, 53-63.
22.	Pitt, M. (2013). In research in Malysia. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, 111-116.
23.	PITT, M. (2013). In research in Malysia. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, 111-116.
24.	R. J. Campbell, L. K. ( 2010). Differential Teacher Effectiveness: Towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Journal of Oxford Review Of Education, 347-362.
25.	Rajeev.V. (2008). Research report::Indian FMCG Industry by Action financial services India ltd.(AFSIL). 
26.	Rashid, M. I. (febuary 2011). A critical analysis of performance appraisal system for teachers in public sector universities of Pakistan: A case study of the Islamia University of Bahawalpur (IUB). African journal of business management, 3735-3744.
27.	Rea, R. (1983). practitioner Forum Effective performance appraisal. Journal Of Accountancy, 112.
28.	Sayantani G, N. .. (August 2013 ). New Model of Performance Management and Measurement in Higher Education Sector. International Journal Ofscientific Research Volume : 2 , 267-274.
29.	Shivali Jindal, L. N. (2015). Study of effectiveness of performance appraisal. international journal of Granthaalya, 2394-3629.
30.	Tyler, E. S. (2012). The Effect of Evaluation on Teacher Performance. American Economic Review, 3628-3651.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.531634
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/705011
ER  -